IP Library Granted Patent US 12,218,897
Granted Patent B2
US 12,218,897 · App. 17/809,150 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Automated transformation of email signatures

Inventors: Sai Xu (Nanjing, CN); Xin Liu (Nanjing, CN); Yimin Liu (Nanjing, CN)
Assignee: Citrix Systems, Inc.
H04L51/07H04L51/21H04L51/42
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,218,897
App. No.
17/809,150
Filed
Jun 27, 2022
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2443
USPC
709/206
Abstract

A system and method for dynamically transforming email signatures. A method includes: receiving an email from an email client prior to delivery to an intended recipient, the email including an original signature; analyzing the email to obtain information associated with the intended recipient of the email; predicting a preferred language of the intended recipient based on the information; converting the original signature to a revised signature, wherein the revised signature utilizes the preferred language; and forwarding the email with the revised signature to the intended recipient.

Claims (36)

1. A system, comprising:

a memory; and

a processor coupled to the memory and configured to automatically transform email signature data according to a process that includes:

receiving an email from an email client prior to delivery;

determining whether the email includes an associated signature file having an original signature of a sender; and

in response to determining that the email includes the associated signature file:

analyzing the email to obtain information associated with an intended recipient of the email;

predicting a preferred language of the intended recipient based on the information;

predicting a preferred formality style for the intended recipient using the information, wherein the preferred formality style is based on a relationship type between the sender and the intended recipient;

converting the original signature from the associated signature file to a revised signature, wherein the revised signature utilizes the preferred language and the preferred formality style; and

forwarding the email with the revised signature to the intended recipient,

wherein the revised signature of the sender is obtained from a set of stored preset signatures in different languages.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the revised signature is dynamically generated by translating the original signature to the preferred language.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein translating the original signature to the preferred language occurs only if a sender of the email enabled an automated translation feature in the email client.

4. The system of claim 2 , further comprising saving the revised signature to a set of stored signatures.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the information associated with the intended recipient includes a set of information elements selected from a group comprising: a language associated with a domain of an intended recipient's email address; a language associated with a company to which the intended recipient's email address belongs; a language inferred from the intended recipient's email address; and a language used by the intended recipient in historical email messages.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the information elements are weighted and evaluated to predict the preferred language.

7. The system of claim 1 , further comprising: analyzing the email to determine a language of a sender; determining if the preferred language of the intended recipient matches the language of the sender; and in response to a match, using the original signature without performing the converting.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the signature data is transformed at one of: an email gateway, an email server plugin, or a transport agent.

9. A method of dynamically transforming email signature data, comprising

receiving an email from an email client prior to delivery to an intended recipient;

determining whether the email includes an original signature of a sender; and

in response to determining that the email includes the original signature:

analyzing the email to obtain information associated with the intended recipient of the email;

predicting a preferred language of the intended recipient based on the information;

predicting a preferred formality style for the intended recipient using the information, wherein the preferred formality style is based on a relationship type between the sender and the intended recipient;

converting the original signature to a revised signature, wherein the revised signature utilizes the preferred language and the preferred formality style; and

forwarding the email with the revised signature to the intended recipient,

wherein the revised signature of the sender is obtained from a set of stored preset signatures in different languages.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the revised signature is dynamically generated by translating the original signature to the preferred language.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein translating the original signature to the preferred language occurs only if a sender of the email enabled an automated translation feature in the email client.

12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising saving the revised signature to a set of stored signatures.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the information associated with the intended recipient includes a set of information elements selected from a group comprising: a language associated with a domain of an intended recipient's email address; a language associated with a company to which the intended recipient's email address belongs; a language inferred from the intended recipient's email address; and a language used by the intended recipient in historical email messages.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the information elements are weighted and evaluated to predict the preferred language.

15. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: analyzing the email to determine a language of a sender; determining if the preferred language of the intended recipient matches the language of the sender; and in response to a match, using the original signature without performing the converting.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein the signature data is transformed at one of: an email gateway, an email server plugin, or a transport agent.

Assignments (3)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 15, 2025
From: CLOUD SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.; CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 072488/0172 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 24, 2024
From: CLOUD SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. (F/K/A TIBCO SOFTWARE INC.); CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 067662/0568 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2022
From: XU, SAI; LIU, XIN; LIU, YIMIN
To: CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 060323/0782 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTCN2022099459 · Jun 17, 2022
Related Publication 20230412542A1 · Dec 21, 2023
References Cited (36)
US 6816884B1 · Summers · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 7865562B2 · Nesbitt · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8301894B2 · Malkin · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9444776B2 · Albouyeh · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9710242B1 · Peermohammed · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 11586940B2 · Allen · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20020188670A1 · Stringham · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20060277153A1 · Mason · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20080040435A1 · Buschi · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080249760A1 · Marcu · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090183006A1 · Malkin · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100286977A1 · Chin · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110307241A1 · Waibel · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120209588A1 · Wu · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130238312A1 · Waibel · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140213224A1 · Woodring · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140303961A1 · Leydon · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160041969A1 · Oonishi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160191448A1 · Eck · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160255490A1 · Mufti · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170048181A1 · Gupta · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170161364A1 · Clark · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180300316A1 · Chissoe · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200265113A1 · Dubey · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200304313A1 · Choudhury · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200387573A1 · Bellrose · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230418566A1 · Athiwaratkun · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240160862A1 · Kim · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 103514156A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004200937A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004042603A2 · 2004 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2006127965A2 · 2006 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2007098012A1 · 2007 [cited by examiner]
WO 2010062540A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021179048A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2022/099459 dated Dec. 16, 2022. [cited by applicant]