IP Library Granted Patent US 12661399
Granted Patent B2
US 12661399 · App. 18/012,089 · Granted Jun 23, 2026

Method of treating an immune-related disorder or disease associated with an organ or tissue transplant with a combination of an anti-CD2 antibody and a CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade

Inventors: David Berglund (New York, NY); Erik Berglund (New York, NY); Felix Sellberg (Uppsala, SE); Christian Binder (Stockholm, SE)
Assignee: Zelarion Malta Limited
A61K39/3955A61K38/1774A61K47/68A61P37/06C07K14/70521C07K16/2806C07K2317/41C07K2317/52C07K2317/732C07K2317/734C07K2317/76C07K2317/92C07K2319/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12661399
App. No.
18/012,089
Granted
Jun 23, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein are improved anti-CD2 antibodies and methods for their use in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic or acute disorders of the immune system. Also provided herein are methods for treating or preventing an immune related disorder or disease in a subject by administering an anti-CD2 antibody or an antigen-binding fragment thereof and a CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade. Compositions for use with these methods and kits are also disclosed.

Claims (31)

1 . A method of treating or preventing an immune-related disorder or disease associated with a kidney transplant or a transplant of kidney tissue in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising:

a) administering more than one dose of an anti-CD2 antibody or an antigen-binding fragment thereof to the subject; and

b) administering a CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade to the subject, wherein the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 22:

wherein a dose of about or at least about 0.6 mg/kg of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is administered to the subject on the same day that the kidney or tissue thereof is transplanted into the subject, and wherein another dose of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is administered to the subject once within two weeks after the kidney or tissue thereof is transplanted into the subject; and wherein the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises:

i) a heavy chain variable region CDR1 comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3;

ii) a heavy chain variable region CDR2 comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4;

iii) a heavy chain variable region CDR3 comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5;

iv) a light chain variable region CDR1 comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6;

v) a light chain variable region CDR2 comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7; and

vi) a light chain variable region CDR3 comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade is belatacept.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the immune-related disorder or disease is a disease associated with the kidney transplant or transplant of kidney tissue, graft rejection, graft-versus-host-disease, or any combination thereof.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a dose of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is not therapeutically effective when the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade is not administered to the subject.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a dose of the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade is not therapeutically effective when the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is not administered to the subject.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in a greater decrease in the level of CD2 in a biological sample obtained from the subject after both the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade are administered to the subject as compared to:

(a) a decrease in the level of CD2 in a biological sample obtained from the subject prior to at least one of the administering the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and/or the administering the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade to the subject; and/or

(b) a decrease in the level of CD2 in a biological sample obtained from the subject after the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof or after the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade, but not both, is administered to the subject; and

wherein the greater decrease is greater by about or at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 100%, or more than 100%.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is administered to the subject on the day of the kidney or the kidney tissue transplantation, on day 1 after the kidney or the kidney tissue transplantation, and/or on day 4 after the kidney or the kidney tissue transplantation.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is administered intravenously or subcutaneously to the subject.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises administering an additional agent to the subject.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the additional agent comprises one or more of a steroid, a calcineurin inhibitor, a cyclosporine, a cyclophosphamide, an antimetabolite therapy, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), an agent used for treating rheumatoid arthritis, and/or an mTOR inhibitor.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the additional agent comprises basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, or a combination thereof.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a first dose of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is administered before a first dose of the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a first dose of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is administered after a first dose of the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a first dose of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is administered concurrently with a first dose of the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject is a treatment-naïve subject.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject is resistant to a treatment of the immune-related disorder or disease.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the administering of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade is synergistic in comparison to the administering the anti-CD2 antibody or to the administering the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade, but not both, to the subject.

18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the administering of the anti-CD2 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade results in a greater decrease in alloimmune response in the subject in comparison to a decrease in alloimmune response after the administering the anti-CD2 antibody or the administering the CTLA-4 co-stimulation blockade, but not both, to the subject; and wherein the greater decrease is greater by about or at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 100%, or more than 100%.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the alloimmune response is determined using an in vitro human T cell proliferation assay or a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay.