IP Library Granted Patent US 12,665,492
Granted Patent B2
US 12,665,492 · App. 18/533,097 · Granted Jun 23, 2026

Apparatus and method for diagnosing a failure of an inverter

Inventors: Gi Heon Jeong (Hwaseong-si, KR); Sae Hyun Park (Daegu, KR); Chan Mook Choi (Incheon, KR); Kyo Beum Lee (Seoul, KR); Hyung Woo Lee (Suwon-si, KR)
Assignees: HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; KIA CORPORATION; AJOU UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY-ACADEMIC COOPERATION FOUNDATION
H02M1/32G01R31/3275H02M7/5395
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,665,492
App. No.
18/533,097
Granted
Jun 23, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus for diagnosing failure of an inverter includes switches coupled to three phases of A, B, and C, respectively. The apparatus also includes a measurer configured to measure each of the output currents of the three phases. The apparatus also includes a comparison processor configured to receive the output currents measured by the measurer and compare the received output currents with a set value. The apparatus also includes a failure determination processor configured to detect a switch having an output current equal to or smaller than the set value based on the comparison performed by the comparison processor to determine the switch as faulty. The failure determination processor is also configured to, upon detecting faulty switch, identify which phase switch is faulty to change the duty ratio of the switch determined to be faulty and to perform phase shift on switches not determined to be faulty.

Claims (30)

1 . An apparatus for diagnosing failure of an inverter, the apparatus comprising:

switches coupled to three phases of A, B, and C, respectively;

a measurer configured to measure each of output currents of the three phases;

a comparison processor configured to receive the output currents measured by the measurer and compare the received output currents with a set value; and

a failure determination processor configured to detect a switch having an output current equal to or smaller than the set value based on the comparison performed by the comparison processor to determine the switch as faulty, and upon detecting faulty switch, configured to identify which phase switch is faulty to change duty ratio of the switch determined to be faulty and to perform phase shift on switches not determined to be faulty,

wherein the failure determination processor is further configured to set a faulted phase duty ratio to 0, when an upper switch of the faulted phase is determined to be faulty.

2 . The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the comparison processor is further configured to receive the output currents of at least two phases coupled to a load and compares the received output currents with the set value.

3 . The apparatus according to claim 2 , wherein the failure determination processor is configured to:

determine whether any of the switches, located at upper and lower ends of each of the three phases, has an output current equal to or smaller than the set value and determine the switch having the output current equal to or smaller than the set value as faulty; and

control a duty ratio of a phase determined to be faulty and perform phase shift on phases operating in normal state.

4 . The apparatus according to claim 3 , wherein, when a phase A upper switch S 1 is determined to be faulty, the failure determination processor sets a phase A duty ratio to 0, performs PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase B, and performs |(PhaseC/180−PhaseA/180)| phase shift on phase C.

5 . The apparatus according to claim 3 , wherein, when a phase A lower switch S 2 is determined to be faulty, the failure determination processor sets a phase A duty ratio to 1, performs 1−PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase B, and performs 1−|(PhaseC/180−PhaseA/180)| phase shift on phase C.

6 . The apparatus according to claim 3 , wherein, when a phase B upper switch S 3 is determined to be faulty, the failure determination processor sets a phase B duty ratio to 0, performs PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase A, and performs (PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase C.

7 . The apparatus according to claim 3 , wherein, when a phase B lower switch S 4 is determined to be faulty, the failure determination processor sets a phase B duty ratio to 1, performs 1−PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase A, and performs (1−PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase C.

8 . The apparatus according to claim 3 , wherein, when a phase C upper switch S 5 is determined to be faulty, the failure determination processor sets a phase C duty ratio to 0, performs |PhaseA/180−PhaseC/180| phase shift on phase A, and performs (PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase B.

9 . The apparatus according to claim 3 , wherein, when a phase C lower switch S 6 is determined to be faulty, the failure determination processor sets a phase C duty ratio to 1, performs 1−|(PhaseA/180−PhaseC/180)| phase shift on phase A, and performs 1−(PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase B.

10 . The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the comparison processor is further configured to compare the output currents measured two or more times by the measurer with the set value.

11 . A method of diagnosing failure of an inverter, the method comprising:

measuring, by a measurer, output currents two times;

comparing, by a comparison processor, the output currents with a set value;

determining, by a failure determination processor, a failure of any of switches located at upper and lower ends of each of three phases based on the measured currents;

when any of the switches located at the upper and lower ends of each of the three phases is determined to be faulty, controlling, by the failure determination processor, a duty ratio of a phase determined to be faulty and performing phase shift on a switch of a phase in normal operation; and

setting, by the failure determination processor, a faulted phase duty ratio to 0, when an upper switch of the faulted phase is determined to be faulty.

12 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein performing the phase shift on the switch of the phase in normal operation comprises, when a phase A upper switch S 1 is determined to be faulty, setting a phase A duty ratio to 0, performing PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase B, and performing |(PhaseC/180−PhaseA/180)| phase shift on phase C, by the failure determination processor.

13 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein performing the phase shift on the switch of the phase in normal operation comprises, when a phase A lower switch S 2 is determined to be faulty, setting a phase A duty ratio to 1, performing 1−PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase B, and performing 1−|(PhaseC/180−PhaseA/180)|phase shift on phase C, by the failure determination processor.

14 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein performing the phase shift on the switch of the phase in normal operation comprises, when a phase B upper switch S 3 is determined to be faulty, setting a phase B duty ratio to 0, performing PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase A, and performing (PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase C, by the failure determination processor.

15 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein performing the phase shift on the switch of the phase in normal operation comprises, when a phase B lower switch S 4 is determined to be faulty, setting a phase B duty ratio to 1, performing 1−PhaseA/180 phase shift on phase A, and performing (1−PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase C, by the failure determination processor.

16 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein performing the phase shift on the switch of the phase in normal operation comprises, when a phase C upper switch S 5 is determined to be faulty, setting a phase C duty ratio to 0, performing |PhaseA/180−PhaseC/180| phase shift on phase A, and performing (PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase B, by the failure determination processor.

17 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein performing the phase shift on the switch of the phase in normal operation comprises, when a phase C lower switch S 6 is determined to be faulty, setting a phase C duty ratio to 1, performing 1−|(PhaseA/180−PhaseC/180)|phase shift on phase A, and performing 1−(PhaseC/180) phase shift on phase B, by the failure determination processor.

18 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein performing the phase shift on the switch of the phase in normal operation comprises, changing, by the failure determination processor, duty ratio of the switch determined to be faulty and performing phase shift on switches not determined to be faulty so that an effective value current equal to a current in a normal state is applied to the phase determined as switch failure.