IP Library Granted Patent US 12686492
Granted Patent B2
US 12686492 · App. 18/654,639 · Granted Jul 21, 2026

Aircraft with transonic rotor

Inventors: Abraham Karem (Lake Forest, CA); John Paul Parcell (Lake Forest, CA); Sage Thayer (Lake Forest, CA); Ryan Patterson (Lake Forest, CA)
Assignee: Karem Aircraft, Inc.
B64C29/0033B64C11/18B64C30/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12686492
App. No.
18/654,639
Granted
Jul 21, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A rotorcraft aircraft design incorporates double swept forward and aft rotor blades configured to provide efficient hover and efficient cruise at Mach number of 0.65-0.7 without varying a diameter of the rotor. The aircraft design combines the benefits of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft, enabling vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) capabilities while also achieving improved forward flight speed and reduced noise emissions.

Claims (17)

1 . A method for operating a tilt rotor aircraft having first proprotor has a blade with an inboard portion and a swept outboard portion, in which:

the swept portion occupies at least 50% of a length of the blade; and

a leading edge of the blade is swept both forward and aft;

the blade is constructed of a medium-modulus carbon fiber whereby a distribution of fiber orientations changes from 0 degree fibers at a blade root and 45 degree fibers at an outboard station of the blade;

and operating the aircraft with a tip speed of the rotor between Mach 0.8-0.9 via a drive system with variable RPM coupled to the first proprotor.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the aft swept portion is at least 30% of the length of the blade, and has an aft sweep of at least 30 degrees.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the inboard portion has a thickness-to-chord ratio of less than 16%.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing, by the first proprotor, at least 80% of a lift required for hover.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing, by the first proprotor, at least 95% of a lift required for hover.

6 . The method of claim 1 , where each of the first proprotor is sized relative to a maximum rated capacity of the aircraft to have a disc loading of up to 40 psf.

7 . The method of claim 1 , where each of the first proprotor is sized relative to a maximum rated capacity of the aircraft to have a disc loading of 40-100 psf.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the first and second proprotors is a hingeless rotor.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the blade has a linear taper of 50% to 58% from 10% to 94% span.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a chord of the blade further reduced by 49% to 55% from 94% span to a tip.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an airfoil thickness ratio of the blade is reduced from 15%-chord at a root to 13%-chord at 60% span and 10%-chord at a tip.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the blade has a total twist of −32 degrees from root to tip.

13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising rotating, by a drive system, each of the first and second proprotors at a rotation speed (RPM) in forward flight less than 70% of a maximum RPM in hover flight.