Automated management of electric vehicles and charging infrastructure in high-demand conditions
A system for managing electric vehicles and charging infrastructure in high-demand conditions. An example system includes a cloud-based policy administration component configured to identify the impacted area, estimate the charging demand in that area during the traffic event, and deploy mitigating policies to electric vehicles and charging stations in the area. Example responsive actions corresponding to the mitigating policies deployed to the charging stations include preparing the charging and cooling equipment to meet the estimated charging demand, charging stationary storage batteries for mitigating estimated power-demand spikes corresponding to the estimated charging demand, and charging an inventory of swappable battery packs to meet estimated battery-swap demand corresponding to the estimated charging demand. Example responsive actions corresponding to the mitigating policies deployed to individual electric vehicles enable optimal matching of the vehicles to the charging stations.
1 . An automated method for managing a charging infrastructure, the method comprising:
determining, with a processor, a set of charging stations to be impacted by a traffic event predicted to cause congestion;
identifying, with the processor, a plurality of electric vehicles that need charging in a geographic area of the traffic event during the traffic event;
for each charging station of the set of charging stations, estimating, with the processor, a respective charging demand during the traffic event;
selecting, with the processor and based on the estimated respective charging demand during the traffic event, a respective first mitigating policy for a respective charging station of the set of charging stations, a respective second mitigating policy for a respective electric vehicle of the plurality of electric vehicles, and a respective third mitigating policy for a respective power-grid system to which the respective charging station is connected, wherein the respective first, second, and third mitigating policies are selected using a common policy-administration operation executed in response to the traffic event, the respective first, second, and third mitigating policies being directed at managing the charging infrastructure for the estimated charging demand;
communicating the respective first mitigating policy, via an input/output interface connected to the processor, to cause an electronic station controller to initiate one or more first responsive actions at the respective charging station;
communicating the respective second mitigating policy, via the input/output interface connected to the processor, to cause an electronic vehicle controller to initiate one or more second responsive actions at the respective electric vehicle; and
communicating the respective third mitigating policy, via the input/output interface connected to the processor, to cause an electronic grid controller to initiate one or more third responsive actions at the respective power-grid system.
2 . The automated method of claim 1 , wherein the determining comprises filtering, with the processor, traffic-event related information received through the input/output interface.
3 . The automated method of claim 2 , wherein the determining further comprises collecting the traffic-event related information from one or more information sources selected from the group of information sources consisting of: historical traffic data; real-time traffic data; information about weather events capable of impacting traffic in a geographic area of the traffic event, and information about anticipatable or predictable high traffic events.
4 . The automated method of claim 1 , further comprising:
matching, with the processor, each electric vehicle of the plurality of electric vehicles with a corresponding charging station of the set of charging stations for charging thereat, the matching being performed to accommodate charging needs of individual electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles; and
communicating results of the matching, via the input/output interface, to the individual electric vehicles.
5 . The automated method of claim 4 , wherein the identifying comprises receiving geolocation information, via the input/output interface, from a vehicle navigation system.
6 . The automated method of claim 4 ,
wherein the identifying comprises retrieving vehicle information of the individual electric vehicles, via the input/output interface, from a database; and
wherein the matching is performed using powertrain information of the individual electric vehicles.
7 . The automated method of claim 4 , wherein the matching is performed using:
driver information corresponding to the individual electric vehicles; and
route information corresponding to the individual electric vehicles.
8 . The automated method of claim 4 , wherein the matching includes estimating times of arrival of the individual electric vehicles to different ones of the set of charging stations.
9 . The automated method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more first responsive actions is/are selected from the group of actions consisting of:
preparing charging equipment to meet the respective charging demand;
preparing cooling equipment to deliver to the charging equipment a cooling capacity corresponding to the respective charging demand;
charging stationary storage batteries for mitigating estimated power-demand spikes corresponding to the respective charging demand; and
charging an inventory of swappable battery packs to meet estimated battery-swap demand corresponding to the respective charging demand.
10 . The automated method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more second responsive actions is/are selected from the group of actions consisting of:
enacting an extended range mode;
shutting down one or more nonessential units, circuits, devices, and accessories;
changing a vehicle regeneration setpoint;
changing a vehicle ride height;
thermally preconditioning a vehicle battery;
indicating trip infeasibility; and
suggesting a different route.
11 . The automated method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more third responsive actions is/are selected from the group of actions consisting of:
preparing the power-grid system for the estimated charging demand;
reallocating a portion of a present power load to charging stationary storage batteries at the respective charging station; and
increasing generator output to a level sufficient for the estimated demand in the geographic area.
12 . The automated method of claim 1 , wherein the common policy-administration operation is configured to deploy mitigating policies to electric vehicles, charging stations, and power grid systems in response to the traffic event.
13 . A system for managing a charging infrastructure, the system comprising:
a hardware processor; and
memory including program code;
wherein the hardware processor is configured, through execution of the program code to:
determine a set of charging stations to be impacted by a traffic event predicted to cause congestion;
identify a plurality of electric vehicles that need charging in a geographic area of the traffic event during the traffic event;
for each charging station of the set of charging stations, estimate a respective charging demand during the traffic event;
select, based on the estimated respective charging demand during the traffic event, a respective first mitigating policy for a respective charging station of the set of charging stations, a respective second mitigating policy for a respective electric vehicle of the plurality of electric vehicles, and a respective third mitigating policy for a respective power-grid system to which the respective charging station is connected, wherein the respective first, second, and third mitigating policies are selected using a common policy-administration operation executed in response to the traffic event, the respective first, second, and third mitigating policies being directed at managing the charging infrastructure for the estimated charging demand;
communicate the respective first mitigating policy, via an input/output interface connected to the hardware processor, to cause an electronic controller to initiate one or more first responsive actions at the respective charging station;
communicate the respective second mitigating policy, via the input/output interface connected to the hardware processor, to cause an electronic vehicle controller to initiate one or more second responsive actions at the respective electric vehicle; and
communicate the respective third mitigating policy, via the input/output interface connected to the hardware processor, to cause an electronic grid controller to initiate one or more third responsive actions at the respective power-grid system.
14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the hardware processor is further configured, through execution of the program code, to filter traffic-event related information received through the input/output interface.
15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the hardware processor is further configured, through execution of the program code, to collect the traffic-event related information from one or more information sources selected from the group of information sources consisting of: historical traffic data; real-time traffic data; information about weather events capable of impacting traffic in a geographic area of the traffic event, and information about anticipatable or predictable high traffic events.
16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the hardware processor is further configured, through execution of the program code, to:
perform matching of each electric vehicle of the plurality of electric vehicles with a corresponding charging station of the set of charging stations for charging thereat, the matching being performed to accommodate charging needs of individual electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles; and
communicate results of the matching, via the input/output interface, to the individual electric vehicles.
17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the hardware processor is further configured, through execution of the program code, to:
receive geolocation information, via the input/output interface, from a vehicle navigation system; and
retrieve vehicle information of the individual electric vehicles, via the input/output interface, from a database.
18 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the matching is performed using one or more of the following:
driver information corresponding to the individual electric vehicles;
route information corresponding to the individual electric vehicles;
iterative adjustment of vehicle policies for the individual electric vehicles; and
iterative adjustment of the respective first mitigating policy of at least one charging station of the set of charging stations.
19 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the matching is performed using powertrain information of the individual electric vehicles.
20 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by an electronic processor, cause the electronic processor to perform operations comprising an automated method for managing a charging infrastructure, the method including:
determining, with a processor, a set of charging stations to be impacted by a traffic event predicted to cause congestion;
identifying, with the processor, a plurality of electric vehicles that need charging in a geographic area of the traffic event during the traffic event;
for each charging station of the set of charging stations, estimating, with the processor, a respective charging demand during the traffic event;
selecting, with the processor and based on the estimated respective charging demand during the traffic event, a respective first mitigating policy for a respective charging station of the set of charging stations, a respective second mitigating policy for a respective electric vehicle of the plurality of electric vehicles, and a respective third mitigating policy for a respective power-grid system to which the respective charging station is connected, wherein the respective first, second, and third mitigating policies are selected using a common policy-administration operation executed in response to the traffic event, the respective first, second, and third mitigating policies being directed at managing the charging infrastructure for the estimated charging demand;
communicating the respective first mitigating policy, via an input/output interface connected to the processor, to cause an electronic station controller to initiate one or more first responsive actions at the respective charging station;
communicating the respective second mitigating policy, via the input/output interface connected to the processor, to cause an electronic vehicle controller to initiate one or more second responsive actions at the respective electric vehicle; and
communicating the respective third mitigating policy, via the input/output interface connected to the processor, to cause an electronic grid controller to initiate one or more third responsive actions at the respective power-grid system.