IP Library Granted Patent US 6,875,616
Granted Patent B1
US 6,875,616 · App. 09/242,254 · Granted Apr 5, 2005

Process for determining the status of an organism by peptide measurement

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,875,616
App. No.
09/242,254
Granted
Apr 5, 2005
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method for detecting the condition of an organism through the measurement of peptides from a sample of said organism containing high- and low-molecular weight peptides, as an indication of the condition of said organism, wherein low-molecular weight peptides are directly detected and characterized; and related to a reference.

Claims (38)

1. A method for detecting a pathogenic conditions in an organism comprising the steps of:

measuring all low-molecular weight peptides having a molecular weight of not more than 30,000 Daltons detectable by MALDI mass spectrometry present in a sample of body fluid taken from said organism

by directly detecting said low-molecular weight peptides by MALDI mass spectrometry; to provide a distribution of low-molecular weight peptides; and

relating said low-molecular weight peptides to a reference

comprising a distribution of low-molecular weight peptides in a representative cross-section of defined controls of said organism to produce a differential peptide display;

wherein said body fluid sample is selected from the group consisting of a hemofiltrate, an ascitic fluid, and urine, wherein said organism is an animal or a human, and wherein said differential peptide display is indicative of a pathogenic condition.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

said detected low-molecular weight peptides have a molecular weight of from 100 to 10,000 Daltons.

3. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein high-molecular weight peptides having a molecular weight of greater than 30,000 Daltons are also present in said sample and said high-molecular weight peptides are either separated off prior to measurement of said low-molecular weight peptides, or left unconsidered, in terms of measurement or evaluation, in the recording of the sample.

4. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein said sample is divided into different fractions prior to said measurement of the low-molecular weight peptides, and the fractions are measured under different detection conditions.

5. A method of detecting the physiological condition of an organism without reference to a preconceived diagnosis comprising the steps of:

(a) directly measuring the distribution of all detectable low-molecular weight peptides in a sample from a test organism; and

(b) comparing the distribution measured in step (a) to a distribution of low-molecular weight peptides from a sample of a reference organism to provide a differential peptide display illustrating the differences in low-molecular weight peptide distribution between the test organism and the reference organism;

wherein the low-molecular weight peptides measured have a molecular weight of not more than 30,000 Daltons; said distributions of low-molecular weight peptides are directly measured by mass spectrometry; and wherein the differential peptide display provides for detection of the physiological condition of the test organism without reference to a preconceived diagnostic hypothesis regarding the condition of the test organism.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the distributions of low-molecular weight peptides are measured by MALDI mass spectrometry or electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein the samples are separated into fractions by liquid chromatography prior to measuring the low-molecular weight peptide distributions.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein the low-molecular weight peptides measured have a molecular weight of from 100 to 10,000 Daltons.

9. The method of claim 5 wherein the test organism and reference organism are both humans or are both the same species of animal.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the reference organism is a normal, healthy organism, and wherein the differential peptide display indicates whether the test organism has a physiological condition that differs from the physiological condition of the healthy reference organism.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the differential peptide display is compared to differential peptide displays from organisms with known pathological conditions in order to diagnose whether the test organism has a known pathological condition.

12. The method of claim 5 wherein the samples are ultrafiltrates of a bodily fluid from the organism selected from the group consisting of a hemofiltrate, a urine ultrafiltrate, and an ascitic fluid ultrafiltrate.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the ultrafiltrate is obtained by filtering the bodily fluid through a size exclusion membrane having an exclusion size of 30,000 Daltons.

14. The method of claim 5 wherein the sample of the reference organism is from the same individual test organism and the differential peptide display indicates a physiological change in the test organism over a period of time.

15. The method of claim 5 wherein the test organism is a genetically engineered organism and the reference organism is a genetic control organism; and wherein the differential peptide display indicates whether the genetically engineered organism exhibits an unpredicted, undesirable or desirable physiological change relative to the genetic control reference organism.

16. The method of claim 5 wherein high-molecular weight peptides are also present in said sample and said high-molecular weight peptides are either separated off prior to measurement of said low-molecular weight peptides, or left unconsidered, in terms of measurement or evaluation, in the recording of the sample.

17. A method of detecting a pathological condition in a human or animal without reference to a preconceived diagnosis comprising the steps of:

(a) directly measuring the distribution of all detectable low-molecular weight peptides in a sample from a test organism;

(b) comparing the distribution measured in step (a) to a distribution of low-molecular weight peptides from a sample of a reference organism to provide a differential peptide display illustrating the differences in low-molecular weight peptide distribution between the test organism and the reference organism; and

(c) comparing the differential peptide display in step (b) with a differential peptide display from an organism having a known pathological condition;

wherein each of the test organism, the reference organism, and the organism having a known pathological condition is a human or each is an animal; the low-molecular weight peptides measured have a molecular weight of not more than 30,000 Daltons; said distributions of low-molecular weight peptides are directly measured by mass spectrometry; and wherein the comparison in step (c) provides for diagnosis of a pathological condition in the test organism without reference to a preconceived diagnostic hypothesis regarding the condition of the test organism.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the low-molecular weight peptides measured have a molecular weight of from 100 to 10,000 Daltons.

19. The method of claim 17 wherein the samples are separated into fractions by liquid chromatography prior to measuring the low-molecular weight peptide distributions.

20. The method of claim 17 wherein the samples are ultrafiltrates of a bodily fluid from the organism selected from the group consisting of a hemofiltrate, a urine ultrafiltrate, and an ascitic fluid ultrafiltrate.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein the ultrafiltrate is obtained by filtering the bodily fluid through a size exclusion membrane having an exclusion size of 30,000 Daltons.

22. The method of claim 17 wherein the distributions of low molecular weight peptides are measured by MALDI or electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

23. The method of claim 17 wherein high-molecular weight peptides are also present in said sample and said high-molecular weight peptides are either separated off prior to measurement of said low-molecular weight peptides, or left unconsidered, in terms of measurement or evalution, in the recording of the sample.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2025
From: CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
To: HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.; DATA SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 074022/0661 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 28, 2020
From: HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.
To: CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 054855/0481 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2012
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: DIGILAB INC
Reel/Frame 028824/0688 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 24, 2008
From: DIGILAB, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 020403/0739 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 7, 2008
From: DIGILAB, INC.
To: HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 020317/0912 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 26, 2007
From: DIGILAB BIOVISION GMBH
To: DIGILAB, INC.
Reel/Frame 020288/0306 →