IP Library Granted Patent US 7,058,597
Granted Patent B1
US 7,058,597 · App. 09/372,253 · Granted Jun 6, 2006

Apparatus and method for adaptive fraud screening for electronic commerce transactions

Assignee: Digital River, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,058,597
App. No.
09/372,253
Granted
Jun 6, 2006
Kind
B1
Abstract

An electronic commerce system managing sale and distribution of products over the Internet or other type of network. In order to prevent attempts by users to fraudulently obtain the products, system analyzes the information submitted by the users in connection with stored and associated information in an order to determine that likelihood that the order is an attempt at fraud. Based upon the determination, system accepts or declines the order. The system also saves the user-entered information for use in determining whether to accept to decline future orders.

Claims (36)

1. An apparatus configured to detect and to prevent attempted fraud during electronic commerce transactions, comprising:

a software-based module within the computerized system configured to provide electronic purchase of products via a network:

a software-based module within the computerized system configured to receive an order, from a user, for one of the products via the network; and

a software-based module within the computerized system configured to generate a cumulative fraud ranking providing an indication of a likelihood that the order involves attempted fraud, the cumulative fraud ranking being generated based upon historical information with respect to transactions with the system before submission of the order, the user's activity with respect to the order during an on-line session to receive the order, and the user's activity with respect to the order after submission of the order for processing.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the generate module includes a module configured to compare the user's progression of pages associated with submitting the order and particular profiles of progression of pages.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the generate module includes a module configured to determine a number of orders requested within a particular time frame and associated with the user and for comparing the number of orders against particular criteria.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the generate module includes a module configured to determine an amount of each of the number of orders and for comparing the amount against particular criteria.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the generate module includes a module configured to compare the fraud ranking against a particular fraud scale.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , further including a module for determining within the computerized system whether to accept the order based upon the cumulative fraud ranking.

7. A method performed by a computerized system for use in detecting and preventing attempted fraud during electronic commerce transactions, comprising:

providing within the computerized system electronic purchase of products via a network;

receiving within the computerized system an order, from a user, for one of the products via the network; and

generating within the computerized system, a cumulative fraud ranking providing an indication of a likelihood that the order involves attempted fraud, the cumulative fraud ranking being generated based upon historical information with respect to transactions with the system before submission of the order, the user's activity with respect to the order during an on-line session to receive the order, and the user's activity with respect to the order after submission of the order for processing.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the generating step includes comparing the user's progression of pages associated with submitting the order and particular profiles of progression of pages.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein the generating step includes:

determining a number of orders requested within a particular time frame and associated with the user; and

comparing the number of orders against particular criteria.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the generating step includes:

determining an amount of each of the number of orders; and

comparing the amount against particular criteria.

11. The method of claim 7 wherein the generating step includes

comparing the fraud ranking against a particular fraud scale.

12. The method of claim 7 wherein the generating step includes comparing the fraud ranking against a particular fraud scale.

13. The method of claim 7 , further including determining within the computerized system whether to accept the order based upon the cumulative fraud ranking.

14. A method performed by a computerized system for use in detecting and preventing attempted fraud during electronic commerce transactions, comprising:

providing within the computerized system electronic purchase of products via a network;

receiving within the computerized system an order, from a user, for one of the products via the-network, the order including several pieces of information related to the order;

generating within the computerized system a cumulative fraud ranking based upon information associated with each of the pieces of information and based upon historical information with respect to transactions with the system before submission of the order, the user's activity with respect to the order during an on-line session to receive the order, and the user's activity with respect to the order after submission of the order for processing; and

determining within the computerized system whether to accept the order based upon the cumulative fraud ranking.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the generating step includes comparing the user's progression of pages associated with submitting the order and particular profiles of progression of pages.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein the generating step includes:

determining a number of orders requested within a particular time frame and associated with the user; and

comparing the number of orders against particular criteria.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the generating step includes:

determining an amount of each of the number of orders; and

comparing the amount against particular criteria.

Assignments (5)
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Recorded Jun 2, 2021
From: MACQUARIE US TRADING LLC
To: DIGITAL RIVER, INC.
Reel/Frame 057252/0637 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Recorded Jun 2, 2021
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC
To: DIGITAL RIVER, INC.
Reel/Frame 057252/0663 →
FIRST LIEN GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST PATENTS Recorded Feb 12, 2015
From: DIGITAL RIVER, INC.
To: MACQUARIE US TRADING LLC
Reel/Frame 034980/0698 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2015
From: DIGITAL RIVER, INC.
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICESLLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 034981/0429 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 11, 1999
From: RONNING, JOEL A.; WICAL, KELLY J.
To: DIGITAL RIVER, INC.
Reel/Frame 010171/0950 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 6011095200 · Dec 4, 1998