IP Library Granted Patent US 7,523,537
Granted Patent B1
US 7,523,537 · App. 09/615,294 · Granted Apr 28, 2009

Method of manufacturing a tuning fork with reduced quadrature errror and symmetrical mass balancing

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,523,537
App. No.
09/615,294
Granted
Apr 28, 2009
Kind
B1
Abstract

Tuning fork and method in which a pair of elongated tines having front and rear surfaces are disposed symmetrically about an axis, and balancing masses on the front surface of one tine and on the rear surface of the other tine are trimmed to reduce quadrature error and also to maintain mass balance between the tines.

Claims (15)

1. In a method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, the steps of: forming a pair of elongated tines which have front and rear surfaces and are disposed symmetrically about an axis, and using balancing masses on the front surface of one tine and the rear surface of the other tine to reduce quadrature displacement in the tines and maintain a balance in mass between the tines.

2. In a method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, the steps of: forming a pair of elongated tines which have front and rear surfaces and are disposed symmetrically about an axis, applying mass elements to the tines, and removing portions of the mass elements from the front surface of one tine and from the rear surface of the other to reduce quadrature displacement in the tines and maintain a balance in mass between the tines.

3. In a method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, the steps of: forming a pair of elongated tines which have front and rear surfaces and are disposed symmetrically about an axis, and adding mass elements to the front surface of one tine and the rear surface of the other tine to eliminate quadrature displacement in the tines and maintain a balance in mass between the tines.

4. In a method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, the steps of forming a pair of elongated tines having free ends of increased lateral dimension with laterally offset balancing masses on opposite sides of the tines near the free ends, and adjusting the balancing masses on opposite sides of the two tines to reduce quadrature displacement in the tines and maintain a balance in mass between the tines.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the balancing masses are adjusted by removing substantially equal amounts of the balancing masses from the opposite sides of the tines.

6. The method of claim 4 further including the step of removing substantially equal amounts of the balancing masses from same sides of the tines to adjust the drive mode frequency of the tuning fork.

7. A method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, comprising the steps of: forming a pair of elongated tines with free ends of increased lateral dimension of a material which is transparent to a laser beam, forming laterally offset balancing masses on opposite sides of the tines near the free ends, and trimming the balancing mass on one side of one of the tines by passing the laser beam through the tine to the balancing mass.

8. In a method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, the steps of: forming an elongated pair of drive tines having front and rear surfaces, forming a pair of pickup tines having front and rear surfaces, applying balancing masses to the front and rearsurfaces of the drive tines, and trimming the balancing masses on opposite sides of the drive tines to reduce quadrature displacement without affecting mass balance between the drive tines.

9. The method of claim 8 further including the step of trimming the masses on same sides of the drive tines to adjust the drive mode frequency of the tuning fork.

10. The method of claim 8 further including the steps of providing masses on the pickup tines, and trimming the masses on the pickup tines to adjust the pickup mode frequency of the tuning fork.

11. In a method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, the steps of: forming a pair of elongated tines which have front and rear surfaces and are disposed symmetrically about an axis, applying balancing masses to the front and rear surfaces of the tines, trimming the balancing masses if necessary to provide a balance in mass between the two tines, and thereafter removing substantially equal amounts of the balancing masses from the front surface of one of the tines and from the rear surface of the other tine to reduce quadrature displacement in the tines and maintain the balance in mass between tines.

12. The method of claim 11 further including the step of removing substantially equal amounts of the balancing masses from same sides of the tines to adjust the drive mode frequency of the tuning fork.

13. In a method of manufacturing a tuning fork for use in an inertial rate sensor, the steps of: forming elongated pairs of drive and pickup tines which have front and rearsurfaces and extend in opposite directions from a central body, applying balancing masses to the front and rear surfaces of the drive tines, trimming the balancing masses if necessary to provide a balance in mass between the drive tines, and thereafter removing substantially equal amounts of the balancing masses from the front surface of one of the drive tines and from the rear surface of the other drive tine to reduce quadrature displacement in the drive tines and maintain the balance in mass between them.

14. The method of claim 13 further including the step of removing substantially equal amounts of the balancing masses from same sides of the drive tines to adjust the drive mode frequency of the tuning fork.

15. The method of claim 13 further including the steps of applying balancing masses to the pickup tines, and removing substantially equal amounts of the balancing masses from same sides of the pickup tines to adjust the pickup mode frequency of the tuning fork.

Assignments (6)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2022
From: EMCORE CORPORATION
To: WINGSPIRE CAPITAL LLC
Reel/Frame 061300/0129 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 058848 FRAME: 0511. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 11, 2022
From: SYSTRON DONNER INERTIAL, INC.
To: EMCORE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059038/0635 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 1, 2022
From: SYSTRON DONNER INERTIAL, INC.
To: EMCOR CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 058848/0511 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2017
From: CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: SYSTRON DONNER INERTIAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 040874/0670 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 2, 2015
From: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
To: BEI SENSORS & SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.; CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; CRYDOM, INC.; BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; KAVLICO CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 037196/0174 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 3, 2014
From: BEI SENSORS & SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.; CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC; CRYDOM, INC.; BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; KAVLICO CORPORATION
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 033888/0700 →