IP Library Granted Patent US 6,954,426
Granted Patent B2
US 6,954,426 · App. 09/728,615 · Granted Oct 11, 2005

Method and system for routing in an ATM network

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,954,426
App. No.
09/728,615
Granted
Oct 11, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for routing in an ATM network, which has a plurality of nodes connected to each other via links and a network management centre connected to the ATM network. The optimisation information is defined in a centralized manner in the network management centre and the nodes apply the results of this centralized optimisation according to their own condition. The optimisation information is defined so that sum of rejected capacity for each connection between an origin node and a terminal node does not exceed a predetermined limit. The invention provides the advantage that the operation of individual nodes in setting up connections is very fast. Moreover, a fair distribution of network resources among users is achieved.

Claims (16)

1. Method for routing in an ATM network ( 1 ) comprising a plurality of nodes ( 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ) connected to each other via links ( 110 - 117 ), a network management centre ( 2 ) being connected to said ATM network ( 1 ), in which method an ATM call is routed from an originating node to a terminal node, characterised in that

optimisation information is defined in a centralised manner in the network management centre ( 2 );

the optimisation information is so defined that a sum of rejected capacity for each connection does not exceed a predetermined limit;

the optimisation information is transferred to the nodes ( 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ); and

the ATM call is routed in the originating node using the optimisation information and local status information.

2. Method as defined in claim 1 , characterised in that the optimisation information is so defined as to minimise a sum of rejected capacity for traffic categories and for connections in each category, said sum being weighted by returns obtained from the connections.

3. Method as defined in claim 1 , characterised in that the optimisation information is so defined that a sum of rejected capacity for connections in each traffic category does not exceed a predetermined limit for the traffic category concerned.

4. Method as defined in claim 1 , characterised in that the optimisation information is defined using a capacity required by connection requests received by the nodes.

5. System for routing in an ATM network ( 1 ) comprising a plurality of nodes ( 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ) connected to each other via links ( 110 - 117 ), a network management centre ( 2 ) being connected to said ATM network ( 1 ), in which system an ATM call is routed from an originating node to a terminal node, characterised in that

the system comprises optimisation means in conjunction with the network management centre ( 2 ) for centralised definition of optimisation information;

the system comprises means for defining the optimisation information so that a sum of rejected capacity for each connection does not exceed a predetermined limit;

the system comprises means for transferring the optimisation information to the nodes ( 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ); and

the system comprises means ( 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ) for routing the ATM call in the originating node using the optimisation information and local status information.

6. System as defined in claim 5 , characterised in that the system comprises means for defining the optimisation information so as to minimise a sum of rejected capacity for traffic categories and connections in each category, said sum being weighted by returns obtained from the connections.

7. System as defined in claim 5 , characterised in that the system comprises means for defining the optimisation information so that a sum of rejected capacity for connections in each traffic category does not exceed a predetermined limit for the traffic category concerned.

8. System as defined in claim 5 , characterised in that the system comprises means for utilising the capacity required by connection requests received by the nodes ( 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ) in defining the optimisation information.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2018
From: FORM HOLDINGS CORP. (FORMERLY VRINGO INC.)
To: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
Reel/Frame 045921/0512 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 7, 2016
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: VRINGO, INC.
Reel/Frame 038380/0956 →
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2015
From: VRINGO, INC.
To: IROQUOIS MASTER FUND, L.P.
Reel/Frame 035624/0710 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 5, 2015
From: VRINGO INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
To: VRINGO, INC.
Reel/Frame 035585/0371 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 24, 2012
From: NOKIA CORPORATION
To: VRINGO INFRASTRUCTURE INC.
Reel/Frame 029010/0345 →
CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT Recorded Sep 12, 2012
From: SUOMINEN, JUKKA
To: NOKIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 028949/0239 →