IP Library Granted Patent US 7,149,188
Granted Patent B2
US 7,149,188 · App. 09/771,225 · Granted Dec 12, 2006

Distributed processing for optimal QOS in a broadband access system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,149,188
App. No.
09/771,225
Granted
Dec 12, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for distributing the QOS processing in a broadband access system to the system modems and the head-end equipment. Requests for a change in the operating parameters are transmitted on an exception basis, thereby greatly reducing the amount of system over-head required. In the upstream, the Cable Modem Termination System (CMTS) or Wireless Modem Termination System (WMTS or Wireless Hub) determines a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) or Bit Error Rate (BER) (or similar measurable parameter) quality data for each received packet. If a measured parameter is outside of the predetermined limits, then the WMTS reports to the NMS (Network Management Operating System) the modem ID and the measured data of the particular packet. The NMS may then modify the operating parameters. In the downstream, each modem determines an SNR or BER (or some other measurable parameter) measurement for the incoming packets. These values may be compared to some boundary conditions. If the system is performing outside the boundary conditions, the modem sends an exception message to the NMS which reassigns the modem to a different downstream channel or modifies the channel parameters.

Claims (51)

1. A method for distributed upstream quality of service (QOS) processing in a broadband access system, the method comprising:

measuring a quality of received packets sent by a modem in an upstream channel at an upstream modem termination system;

determining whether the measured quality is within a predetermined range;

reporting an out-of-range quality for the received packets to a network management server; and

modifying operating parameters for the upstream channel in accordance with the measured quality, if an out-of-range quality is reported;

wherein the out-of-range quality reported includes a measured quality above a high quality threshold and is reported at a different priority than measured qualities below a low quality threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring a quality of received packets comprises measuring a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring a quality of received packets comprises measuring a bit error rate (BER).

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring a quality of received packets comprises measuring a Forward Error Correction (FEC) quality measure.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein if the quality measure is below a predetermined lower limit for some averaged or weighted averaged value for a series of packets, then the modem ID and the measured quality data of a particular packet or average is reported to the network management server.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a different downstream channel in the same or overlapping sector, which has a different operating frequency.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a lower order modulation type.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a lower symbol rate.

9. The method of claim 5 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a more robust Forward Error Correction scheme.

10. The method of claim 5 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a combination of a different frequency, a lower order modulation type, a lower symbol rate, and a more robust Forward Error Correction scheme.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein if the quality measure is above a predetermined upper limit for some averaged or weighted averaged value for a series of packets, then the modem ID and the measured quality data of a particular packet or average is reported to the network management server.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a channel with a higher order modulation.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a different type of modulation.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a faster symbol rate.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a lower Forward Error Correction scheme.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the network management server reassigns the modem to a channel which has similar parameters but less traffic.

17. A method, for distributed downstream quality of service (QOS) processing in a broadband access system, the method comprising:

measuring a quality of received packets in a downstream channel at a modem;

comparing the measured quality with predetermined boundary conditions;

determining whether the measured quality is within the predetermined boundary conditions;

sending an exception to a network management server, if the measured quality is outside the boundary conditions; and

modifying operating parameters for the downstream channel in accordance with the measured quality;

wherein if the measured quality is below a lower boundary condition, the exception is sent with a high priority, and if the measured quality is above a high boundary condition, the exception is sent with a lower priority.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein if the measured quality is below a lower limit, the network management server reassign the modem to a different downstream channel.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein if the measured quality exceeds an upper limit, then the modem sends an exception signal offering to move to a less utilized channel.

20. The method of claim 17 , wherein if the measured quality exceeds an upper limit, then the modem sends an exception signal offering to move to a channel with a higher net data rate.

21. The method according to claim 17 , wherein the method is performed in a broadband wireless access system.

22. A method for distributed processing for optimal quality of service (QOS) in a broadband access system, the method comprising:

a method for distributed upstream quality of service (QOS) processing, the method comprising:

measuring a quality of received packets sent by a modem in an upstream channel at an upstream modem termination system;

determining whether the measured quality is within a predetermined range;

reporting an out-of-range quality for the received packets to a network management server; and

modifying operating parameters for the upstream channel in accordance with the measured quality, if an out-of-range quality is reported; and

a method for distributed downstream quality of service (QOS) processing, the method comprising:

measuring a quality of received packets in a downstream channel at a modem;

comparing the measured quality with predetermined boundary conditions;

determining whether the measured quality is within the predetermined boundary conditions;

sending an exception to a network management server, if the measured quality is outside the boundary conditions; and

modifying operating parameters for the downstream channel in accordance with the measured quality;

wherein:

the exception is sent,

at a first priority if the measured quality is below and outside the boundary conditions, and

at a second priority if the measured quality is above and outside the boundary conditions; and

the first priority is higher than the second priority.

23. The method according to claim 22 , wherein the method is performed in a broadband wireless access system.

24. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method is performed in a broadband wireless access system.

Assignments (5)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY TO INCLUDE ITEMIZED LISTING OF PROPERTIES NOT FOUND IN PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026379 FRAME 0319. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ITEMIZED LISTING OF PROPERTIES NOT FOUND IN REEL/FRAME 026379/0319 IS NOW COMPLETE. Recorded Apr 12, 2012
From: GOLDMAN SACHS INVESTMENT PARTNERS AGGREGATING FUND HOLDINGS, L.P.; SYNTEK CAPITAL GMBH; GILO VENTURES II. L.P.
To: JAVELIN INNOVATIONS, INC.; VYYO LTD.; XTEND NETWORKS LTD.; XTEND NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 028049/0491 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2011
From: GOLDMAN SACHS INVESTMENT PARTNERS AGGREGATING FUND HOLDINGS, L.P.; SYNTEK CAPITAL GMBH; GILO VENTURES II, L.P.
To: JAVELIN INNOVATIONS, INC.; VYYO LTD.; XTEND NETWORKS LTD.; XTEND NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 026379/0319 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S CORRECT NAME IS: GILO VENTURES II, L.P. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 021648 FRAME 0536. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT. Recorded Dec 11, 2008
From: VYYO INC.
To: GILO VENTURES II, L.P.
Reel/Frame 021962/0274 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 8, 2008
From: VYYO INC.
To: GILO VENTURES IL, L.P.
Reel/Frame 021648/0536 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 11, 2001
From: WILSON, ERIC K.
To: VYYO LTD.
Reel/Frame 011791/0388 →