IP Library Granted Patent US 7,006,483
Granted Patent B2
US 7,006,483 · App. 09/792,637 · Granted Feb 28, 2006

Qualifying available reverse link coding rates from access channel power setting

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,006,483
App. No.
09/792,637
Granted
Feb 28, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

Data rate allocation decisions are made for a communications channel, such as a wireless reverse link connection. A first parameter used in this determination is a path loss, which is determined by the following process. First, a message is sent from a first station to a second station, such as on a paging channel. The message indicates a forward Effective Radiated Power (ERP) of a pilot signal transmitted by the first station. The second station then determines the received signal strength of this pilot signal, taking into account receiver gains. The path loss can then be estimated by the second station as the difference between the forward ERP data value that it received and the detected received pilot power. The second station also then preferably determines a transmit power level when transmitting a message back to the first station. This transmit power level information is encoded as a digital data word together with the forward path loss information as calculated by the first station. Upon receipt of these two pieces of information by the first station, the forward path loss estimate as calculated by the second station, and the output power value of the second station, the first station can then determine the amount of excess power available at the field unit. This excess power difference is indicative of the amount of dynamic range available in the transmit power amplifier in the particular second station. With this information, the first station can then make a determination as to whether coding rates which require a higher dynamic range will be acceptable for use by the particular second station.

Claims (27)

1. A method for determining data rate for a communications channel comprising the steps of:

sending a first message from a first station to a second station, the message indicating an Effective Radiated Power (ERP) data value of signals transmitted by the first station;

receiving the first message at a second station;

measuring a signal strength for signal received at the second station;

computing a path loss estimate at the second station as the difference between the ERP data value that it received and the measured signal strength;

measuring the transmit power level for signals transmitted by the second station;

sending a one or more messages from the second station to the first station, the message indicating transmit power level information and the forward path loss information;

receiving the transmit power level information and the forward path loss information at the first station, and calculating an amount of excess power available at the second station; and

determining an acceptable data coding rate for transmission between the first station and the second station from the excess power available.

2. A method as in claim 1 wherein determining an acceptable data coding rate includes selecting from among multiple available Forward Error Correction (FEC) coding rates.

3. A method as in claim 1 wherein determining an acceptable data coding rate includes selecting from among available modulation rates.

4. A method as in claim 1 wherein the first station is a base station and the second station is a field unit.

5. A method as in claim 4 wherein the first message is sent on a paging channel.

6. A wireless communication system in which digital signals are communicated comprising:

a first station for:

(i) sending a first message to a second station, the message indicating an Effective Radiated Power (ERP) data value of signals transmitted by the first station;

(ii) receiving a transmit power level information and a forward path loss information from a second station, and calculating an amount of excess power available at the second station; and

(ii) determining an acceptable data coding rate for transmission between the first station and the second station from the excess power available; and

a second station for:

(i) receiving the first message and measuring a signal strength for received signal;

(ii) computing a path loss estimate at the second station as the difference between the ERP data value that it received and the measured signal strength;

(iii) measuring the transmit power level for signals transmitted by the second station;

(iv) sending a one or more messages to the first station, the message indicating transmit power level information and the forward path loss information.

7. A wireless communication system as in claim 6 wherein determining an acceptable data coding rate includes selecting from among multiple available Forward Error Correction (FEC) coding rates.

8. A wireless communication system as in claim 6 wherein determining an acceptable data coding rate includes selecting from among available modulation rates.

9. A wireless communication system as in claim 6 wherein the first station is a base station and the second station is a field unit.

10. A wireless communication system as in claim 9 wherein the first message is sent on a paging channel.

Assignments (14)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 8, 2012
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 028345/0179 →
LICENSE Recorded Jun 8, 2012
From: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: IPR HOLDINGS DELAWARE, INC.
Reel/Frame 028349/0387 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 8, 2012
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 028339/0500 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 25, 2006
From: MASTER LOCK COMPANY
To: MASTER LOCK COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 018420/0883 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2004
From: INTERDIGITAL PATENT CORPORATION
To: IPR LICENSING, INC.
Reel/Frame 014420/0435 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 26, 2004
From: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: INTERDIGITAL ACQUISITION CORP.
Reel/Frame 015000/0141 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 26, 2004
From: INTERDIGITAL ACQUISITION CORP.
To: INTERDIGITAL PATENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015000/0577 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2004
From: INTERDIGITAL ACQUISITION CORPORATION
To: INTERDIGITAL PATENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 014351/0777 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 24, 2003
From: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: IPR HOLDINGS DELAWARE, INC.
Reel/Frame 014289/0207 →
RELEASE Recorded Apr 28, 2003
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 013974/0213 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 25, 2002
From: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 013045/0200 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2002
From: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 013019/0791 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 22, 2002
From: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 012506/0808 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 6, 2001
From: NELSON, GEORGE RODNEY, JR.; PROCTOR, JAMES A. JR.; HOFFMANN, JOHN E.; ROUPHAEL, ANTOINE J.
To: TANTIVY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 011866/0728 →