IP Library Granted Patent US 6,980,966
Granted Patent B1
US 6,980,966 · App. 09/842,297 · Granted Dec 27, 2005

Guided buying decision support in an electronic marketplace environment

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,980,966
App. No.
09/842,297
Granted
Dec 27, 2005
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system ( 10 ) for providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment includes a server ( 42 ) that interacts with buyers ( 12 ) to receive procurement parameters for items. An option generator ( 50 ) receives procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer ( 12 ), determines one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item, and generates one or more recommended options for communication to the buyer ( 12 ), each recommended option specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters. The server ( 42 ) further interacts with the buyer ( 12 ) to receive a selection of a particular recommended option. A manager application ( 46 ) automatically initiates the service specified in the selected recommended option in an attempt to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters.

Claims (147)

1. A system providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment, comprising:

a server operable to interact with buyers to receive procurement parameters for items;

an option generator operable to:

receive procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer;

determine one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item; and

generate a plurality of diverse types of recommended options for communication to the buyer to enable the buyer to select one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options, each of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with procurement parameters, the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection comprising:

a recommended purchase from the supplier currently offering the item at the lowest price consistent with the procurement parameters;

a recommended auction in which the item is currently being auctioned under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters; and

a recommended reverse auction that may be initiated with respect to the item under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters;

the server further operable to:

communicate to the buyer a recommended course of action specifying the recommended option that should be selected from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection to give the buyer the best opportunity to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters and at the lowest price; and

interact with the buyer to receive a selection of a particular recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection; and

a manager application operable to automatically initiate the service specified in the selected one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options in an attempt to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the procurement parameters comprise:

one or more parameters each specifying a characteristic of the item;

one or more parameters each specifying a date by which the item must be procured; and

one or more parameters each specifying a characteristic of an acceptable supplier of the item.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the server is operable to communicate to the buyer a first display through which the buyer may input the procurement parameters and a second display through which the buyer may select a recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the server is operable to communicate to the buyer a single display through which the buyer may select a recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection or input one or more alternative procurement parameters, the display allowing the buyer to see in substantially real time the impact of the alternative procurement parameters on the plurality of diverse types of recommended options.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the recommended purchase in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options is based on data obtained from a catalog, an inventory listing, or a bid/ask exchange through which the supplier is offering the item.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the circumstances of the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options are selected from the group consisting of:

the date the auction is scheduled to complete is consistent with a delivery date procurement parameter and the last bid is below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination;

the auction is the currently running auction expected to close at the lowest price; and

the auction is the currently running auction with the highest probability that the buyer will win the auction with a bid below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the probability of winning an auction is determined according to the length of time the auction has already been running, the length of time the auction will continue running, and the percentage of buyers that could participate in the auction but have not yet placed bids.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the probability of the buyer winning the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options is provided to the buyer to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended auction instead of the recommended purchase.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the manager is operable to recommend a bid for placement in the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the recommended bid is a proxy bid with specified increments and a ceiling equal to the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the circumstances of the recommended reverse auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options are selected from the group consisting of:

there are at least a specified number of suppliers that could satisfy a delivery date procurement parameter if the reverse auction lasted for a specified length of time; and

the reverse auction has the highest probability of all evaluated reverse auctions that the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the probability the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination is determined according to:

the length of time the reverse auction can be allowed to run consistent with a delivery date procurement parameter; and

the number of suppliers that could satisfy the delivery date procurement parameter if the reverse auction was allowed to run for that length of time.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the probability the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination is provided to the buyer to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended reverse auction instead of the recommended purchase or the recommended auction.

14. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a planning engine operable to receive status data for the buyer from one or more associated enterprise systems, the status data specifying one or more of the procurement parameters.

15. The system of claim 1 , further comprising an electronic marketplace that supports the server, the option generator, and the manager application.

16. A method of providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment, comprising:

receiving procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer;

determining one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item;

generating a plurality of diverse types of recommended options for communication to the buyer to enable the buyer to select one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options, each of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters, the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection comprising:

a recommended purchase from the supplier currently offering the item at the lowest price consistent with the procurement parameters;

a recommended auction in which the item is currently being auctioned under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters; and

a recommended reverse auction that may be initiated with respect to the item under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters;

communicating to the buyer a recommended course of action specifying the recommended option that should be selected from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection to give the buyer the best opportunity to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters and at the lowest price;

receiving a selection of a particular recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection; and

automatically initiating the service specified in the selected one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options in an attempt to procure the needed item consistent with the procurement parameters.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the procurement parameters comprise:

one or more parameters each specifying a characteristic of the item;

one or more parameters each specifying a date by which the item must be procured; and

one or more parameters each specifying a characteristic of an acceptable supplier of the item.

18. The method of claim 16 , further comprising communicating to the buyer a first display through which the buyer may input the procurement parameters and a second display through which the buyer may select a recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection.

19. The method of claim 16 , further comprising communicating to the buyer a single display through which the buyer may select a recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection or input one or more alternative procurement parameters, the display allowing the buyer to see in substantially real time the impact of the alternative procurement parameters on the plurality of diverse types of recommended options.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the recommended purchase in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options is based on data obtained from a catalog, an inventory listing, or a bid/ask exchange through which the supplier is offering the item.

21. The method of claim 16 , wherein the circumstances of the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options are selected from the group consisting of:

the date the auction is scheduled to complete is consistent with a delivery date procurement parameter and the last bid is below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination;

the auction is the currently running auction expected to close at the lowest price; and

the auction is the currently running auction with the highest probability that the buyer will win the auction with a bid below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the probability of winning an auction is determined according to the length of time the auction has already been running, the length of time the auction will continue running, and the percentage of buyers that could participate in the auction but have not yet placed bids.

23. The method of claim 16 , further comprising providing to the buyer the probability of the buyer winning the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended auction instead of the recommended purchase.

24. The method of claim 16 , further comprising recommending a bid for placement in the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options.

25. The method of claim 24 , wherein the recommended bid is a proxy bid with specified increments and a ceiling equal to the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

26. The method of claim 16 , wherein the circumstances of the recommended reverse auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options are selected from the group consisting of:

that there are at least a specified number of suppliers that could satisfy a delivery date procurement parameter if the reverse auction lasted for a specified length of time; and

the reverse auction has the highest probability of all evaluated reverse auctions that the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the probability the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination is determined according to:

the length of time the reverse auction can be allowed to run consistent with a delivery date procurement parameter; and

the number of suppliers that could satisfy the delivery date procurement parameter if the reverse auction was allowed to run for that length of time.

28. The method of claim 26 , further comprising providing to the buyer the probability the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended reverse auction instead of the recommended purchase or the recommended auction.

29. The method of claim 16 , further comprising receiving status data for the buyer from one or more associated enterprise systems, the status data specifying one or more of the procurement parameters.

30. The method of claim 16 , wherein the method is performed using components of an electronic marketplace.

31. Software for providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment, the software embodied in a computer-readable medium and when executed operable to:

receive procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer;

determine one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item;

generate a plurality of diverse types of recommended options for communication to the buyer to enable the buyer to select one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options, each of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters, the plurality of diverse types of recommended option options communicated to the buyer for selection comprising:

a recommended purchase from the supplier currently offering the item at the lowest price consistent with the procurement parameters;

a recommended auction in which the item is currently being auctioned under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters; and

a recommended reverse auction that may be initiated with respect to the item under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters;

communicate to the buyer a recommended course of action specifying the recommended option that should be selected from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection to give the buyer the best opportunity to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters and at the lowest price;

receive a selection of a particular recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection; and

automatically initiate the service specified in the selected one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options in an attempt to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters.

32. The software of claim 31 , wherein the procurement parameters comprise:

one or more parameters each specifying a characteristic of the item;

one or more parameters each specifying a date by which the item must be procured; and

one or more parameters each specifying a characteristic of an acceptable supplier of the item.

33. The software of claim 31 , further operable to communicate to the buyer a first display through which the buyer may input the procurement parameters and a second display through which the buyer may select a recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection.

34. The software of claim 31 , further operable to communicate to the buyer a single display through which the buyer may select a recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection or input one or more alternative procurement parameters, the display allowing the buyer to see in substantially real time the impact of the alternative procurement parameters on the plurality of diverse types of recommended options.

35. The software of claim 31 , wherein the recommended purchase in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options is based on data obtained from a catalog, an inventory listing, or a bid/ask exchange through which the supplier is offering the item.

36. The software of claim 31 , wherein the circumstances of the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options are selected from the group consisting of:

the date the auction is scheduled to complete is consistent with a delivery date procurement parameter and the last bid is below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination;

the auction is the currently running auction expected to close at the lowest price; and

the auction is the currently running auction with the highest probability that the buyer will win the auction with a bid below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

37. The software of claim 36 , wherein the probability of winning an auction is determined according to the length of time the auction has already been running, the length of time the auction will continue running, and the percentage of buyers that could participate in the auction but have not yet placed bids.

38. The software of claim 31 , further operable to provide to the buyer the probability of the buyer winning the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended auction instead of the recommended purchase.

39. The software of claim 31 , further operable to recommend a bid for placement in the recommended auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options.

40. The software of claim 39 , wherein the recommended bid is a proxy bid with specified increments and a ceiling equal to the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

41. The software of claim 31 , wherein the circumstances of the recommended reverse auction in the plurality of diverse types of recommended options are selected from the group consisting of:

that there are at least a specified number of suppliers that could satisfy a delivery date procurement parameter if the reverse auction lasted for a specified length of time; and

the reverse auction has the highest probability of all evaluated reverse auctions that the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination.

42. The software of claim 41 , wherein the probability the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination is determined according to:

the length of time the reverse auction can be allowed to run consistent with a delivery date procurement parameter; and

the number of suppliers that could satisfy the delivery date procurement parameter if the reverse auction was allowed to run for that length of time.

43. The software of claim 41 , further operable to provide to the buyer the probability the buyer will procure the item below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended reverse auction instead of the recommended purchase or the recommended auction.

44. The software of claim 31 , further operable to receive status data for the buyer from one or more associated enterprise systems, the status data specifying one or more of the procurement parameters.

45. The software of claim 31 , wherein the software is executed using components of an electronic marketplace.

46. A system providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment, comprising:

means for receiving procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer, determining one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item;

means for generating a plurality of diverse types of recommended options for communication to the buyer to enable the buyer to select one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options, each of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters, the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection comprising:

a recommended purchase from the supplier currently offering the item at the lowest price consistent with the procurement parameters;

a recommended auction in which the item is currently being auctioned under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters; and

a recommended reverse auction that may be initiated with respect to the item under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters;

means for communicating to the buyer a recommended course of action specifying the recommended option that should be selected from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection to give the buyer the best opportunity to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters and at the lowest price; and

means for interacting with the buyer to receive a selection of a particular recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection; and

means for automatically initiating the service specified in the selected one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options in an attempt to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters.

47. A system providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment, comprising:

a server operable to interact with buyers to receive procurement parameters for items;

an option generator operable to:

receive procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer;

determine one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item; and

generate a plurality of diverse types of recommended options for communication to the buyer to enable the buyer to select one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options, each of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters, the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection comprising:

a recommended purchase from the supplier offering the item at the lowest price consistent with the procurement parameters;

a recommended auction in which the item is being auctioned under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters; and

a recommended reverse auction that may be initiated with respect to the item under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters;

the server further operable to:

provide to the buyer the probabilities the buyer will procure the item in the recommended auction and in the recommended reverse auction below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended auction or recommended reverse auction, respectively, instead of the recommended purchase; and

interact with the buyer to receive a selection of a particular recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection; and

a manager application operable to automatically initiate the service specified in the selected one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options in an attempt to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters.

48. A method of providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment, comprising:

receiving procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer;

determining one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item;

generating a plurality of diverse types of recommended options for communication to the buyer to enable the buyer to select one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options, each of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters, the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection comprising:

a recommended purchase from the supplier offering the item at the lowest price consistent with the procurement parameters;

a recommended auction in which the item is being auctioned under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters; and

a recommended reverse auction that may be initiated with respect to the item under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters;

providing to the buyer the probabilities the buyer will procure the item in the recommended auction and in the recommended reverse auction below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended auction or recommended reverse auction, respectively, instead of the recommended purchase; and

receiving a selection of a particular recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection; and

automatically initiating the service specified in the selected one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options in an attempt to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters.

49. Software for providing guided buying decision support within an electronic marketplace environment, the software being embodied in a computer-readable medium and when executed operable to:

receive procurement parameters for a particular item needed by a particular buyer;

determine one or more acceptable item-supplier combinations consistent with the procurement parameters for the item;

generate a plurality of diverse types of recommended options for communication to the buyer to enable the buyer to select one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options, each of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection specifying a service through which it is possible to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters, the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection comprising:

a recommended purchase from the supplier offering the item at the lowest price consistent with the procurement parameters;

a recommended auction in which the item is being auctioned under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters; and

a recommended reverse auction that may be initiated with respect to the item under circumstances consistent with the procurement parameters;

provide to the buyer the probabilities the buyer will procure the item in the recommended auction and in the recommended reverse auction below the lowest price quoted against an acceptable item-supplier combination to allow the buyer to decide whether to select the recommended auction or recommended reverse auction, respectively, instead of the recommended purchase;

receive a selection of a particular recommended option from among the plurality of diverse types of recommended options communicated to the buyer for selection; and

automatically initiate the service specified in the selected one of the plurality of diverse types of recommended options in an attempt to procure the item consistent with the procurement parameters.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 16, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.; BLUE YONDER, INC.; JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC.; I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC; MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC.; MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC.; REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC; JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC.; REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION; BY BOND FINANCE, INC.; BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC.; BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 057724/0593 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REEL 026468 FRAME NUMBER FROM 0199 TO 0119 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 055136 FRAME 0623. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 19, 2021
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 056813/0110 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 026740 FRAME: 0676. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 8, 2021
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 055257/0747 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026468 FRAME 0199. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME FROM I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. TO JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.. Recorded Dec 12, 2020
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 055136/0623 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0809 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0356 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: RP CROWN PARENT, LLC; RP CROWN HOLDING LLC; JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040326/0449 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0697 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0053 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0697 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0809 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Recorded Dec 21, 2012
From: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 029529/0812 →