IP Library Granted Patent US 6,864,778
Granted Patent B2
US 6,864,778 · App. 09/864,108 · Granted Mar 8, 2005

Method of preventing collision between remote control signals

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,864,778
App. No.
09/864,108
Granted
Mar 8, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a system including an apparatus and a plurality of remote controls. Each remote control is equipped with a detector for detecting infrared signals from the other remote controls. The remote controls are capable of controlling the transmission of messages in dependence on a detection of signals from the other remote controls. In this way, collision between signals from different remote controls is prevented.

Claims (35)

1. A system including an apparatus and at least one remote control, said remote control comprising:

a transmitter for transmitting control data to the apparatus; and

collision preventing means for preventing collision between said control data and further control data transmitted by a further remote control, characterized in that the remote control further comprises;

detection means for detecting said further control data, the collision preventing means controlling the transmission of the control data in dependence on a detection by the detection means of the further control data.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the collision preventing means delays transmission of the control data until said detection means does not detect further control data for a predetermined delay period.

3. The system as claimed in claim 2 , characterized in that the collision preventing means extends the delay period by a random period of time.

4. The system as claimed in claim 2 , characterized in that the remote control further comprises:

priority means for assigning a priority to the remote control relative to further remote controls, the collision preventing means extending the delay period by a period of time having a length dependent on said priority.

5. The system as claimed in claim 4 , characterized in that the priority means lowers the priority relative to the further remote controls after a transmission.

6. The system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 , characterized in that the collision preventing means retransmits the control data if the detection means detects the further control data within a predetermined period of time after a first transmission of the control data.

7. The system as claimed in claim characterized in that the transmission of the control data involves on-off keying, wherein the detection means detects the further control data during ‘off’ periods, and the collision preventing means aborts the transmission of the control data upon such detection of the further control data, and retransmits the control data at a later instant.

8. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said system includes a television receiver.

9. The system claimed in claim 1 , wherein said system comprises a computer system.

10. A remote control comprising:

a transmitter for transmitting control data to an apparatus; and

collision preventing means for preventing collision between said control data and further control data transmitted by a further remote control, characterized in that the remote control further comprises:

detection means for detecting said further control data, the collision preventing means controlling the transmission of the control data in dependence on the detection of the further control data by the detection means.

11. A method of transmitting control data from a remote control to an apparatus, comprising the step of:

preventing collision between said control data and further control data transmitted by a further remote control, characterized in that the method further comprises the step of:

detecting said further control data, wherein the step of preventing collision comprises controlling the transmission of the control data in dependence on the detection of the further control data.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11 , characterized in that the method further comprises Bathe step of:

delaying the transmission of the control data until no further control data have been detected for a predetermined delay period.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 , characterized in that the method further comprises the step of:

extending the delay period by a random period of time.

14. The method as claimed in claim 12 , characterized in that the method further comprises the steps of:

assigning a priority to the remote control relative to further remote controls;

extending the delay period by a period of time whose length is dependent on said priority.

15. The method as claimed in claim 14 , characterized in that the method further comprises the step of:

lowering the priority relative to the further remote controls after a transmission.

16. The method as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 15 , characterized in that the method further comprises the step of:

retransmitting the control data if the further control are detected within a predetermined period of time after a first transmission of the control data.

17. The method as claimed in claim 11 , characterized in that the transmission of the control data involves on-off keying, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

detecting the further control data during ‘off’ periods;

aborting the transmission of the control data upon such detection of the further control data; and

retransmitting the control data at a later instant.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2015
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
To: HOME CONTROL SIGNAPORE PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 036096/0162 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE FOURTH ASSIGNOR'S NAME FILED ON 08-02-2001, RECORDED ON REEL 012038 FRAME 0218 ASSIGNOR HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE ENTIRE INTEREST. Recorded Oct 30, 2001
From: MUSSCHEBROECK, RUDY; LAMBRECHTS, MARC EMIEL CELINE; WOUTERS, JOHAN AGNES EMILE; VAN OVERBEKE, GEERT LUK MARIA
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
Reel/Frame 012283/0876 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2001
From: MUSSCHEBROECK, RUDY; LAMBRECHTS, MARC EMIEL CELINE; WOUTERS, JOHAN AGNES EMILE; OVERBEKE, GEERT LIK MARIA VAN
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTONICS N.V.
Reel/Frame 012038/0218 →