Antenna diversity receiver
View Patent ↗An antenna diversity receiver comprises a zero-IF receiver connected to two antennas ( 102 a , 102 b ) via switches ( 532,534 ). Simultaneous measurement of signal qualities from both antennas is possible by routing signals from the first antenna ( 102 a ) via a first mixer ( 106 ) and channel filter ( 116 ) and routing signals from the second antenna ( 102 b ) via a second mixer ( 108 ) and channel filter ( 118 ). A diversity controller ( 536 ) compares the signal qualities received from the antennas ( 102 a ,102 b ) during a data preamble to select a preferred antenna, then adjusts the switches ( 532,534 ) to route the signals from the preferred antenna to both input mixers ( 106,108 ). The amplifier ( 104 a ,104 b ) connected to the deselected antenna may be switched off during data reception, thereby minimizing extra power consumption. Such an antenna diversity receiver enables effective antenna selection to be performed, even in systems such as Bluetooth where only a very short preamble is provided for receiver configuration.
1. An antenna diversity receiver comprising in-phase and quadrature channels, means for connection to first and second antennas, switching means having a first state in which signals from the first antenna are routed to the in-phase channel and signals front the second antenna are routed to the quadrature channel, a second state in which signals from the first antenna are routed to both in-phase and quadrature channels, and a third state in which signals from the second antenna are routed to both in-phase and quadrature channels, signal quality comparison means for determining the relative qualities of the received signals in the in-phase and quadrature channels when the switching means is in its first state, and diversity control means for controlling the state of the switching means depending on the relative signal qualities determined by the signal quality comparison means.
2. A receiver as claimed in claim 1 , characterised in that the receiver is a zero-IF receiver.
3. A receiver as claimed in claim 1 , characterised in that the signal quality comparison means includes means for determining a received signal strength indication for each signal.
4. A receiver as claimed in claim 1 , characterised in that first and second amplifying means are provided for amplifying signals from a respective one of the first and second antennas, and in that the diversity control means includes means for switching off the amplifying means corresponding to the unused antenna when the switching means is in its second or third state.
5. An antenna diversity receiver implemented an integrated circuit, comprising in-phase and quadrature channels, means for connection to first and second antennas, switching means having a first state in which signals from the first antenna are routed to the in-phase channel and signals from the second antenna are routed to the quadrature channel, a second state in which signals from the first antenna are routed to both in-phase and quadrature channels, and a third state in which signals from the second antenna are routed to both in-phase and quadrature channels, signal quality comparison means for determining the relative qualities of the received signals in the in-phase and quadrature channels when the switching means is in its first state, and diversity control means for controlling the state of the switching means depending on the relative signal qualities determined by the signal quality comparison means.
6. A receiver as claimed in claim 5 , characterised in that the signal quality comparison means includes means for determining a received signal strength indication for each signal.
7. A receiver as claimed in claim 5 , characterised in that first and second amplifying means are provided for amplifying signals from a respective one of the first and second antennas, and in that the diversity control means includes means for switching off the amplifying means corresponding to the unused antenna when the switching means is in its second and third state.