IP Library Granted Patent US 7,529,688
Granted Patent B2
US 7,529,688 · App. 09/957,831 · Granted May 5, 2009

Baseline cost savings analysis

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,529,688
App. No.
09/957,831
Granted
May 5, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one embodiment of the present invention, a cost savings analysis system includes one or more software components. The software components collectively receive from a user one or more first inputs specifying a cost savings goal and one or more second inputs specifying a technique for generating a baseline price. The software components collectively access historical transaction data within one or more databases needed to generate a baseline price according to the specified technique, generate the baseline price, determine a variation between the generated baseline price and an actual price for each of one or more transactions corresponding to the specified cost savings goal, and compare the determined variations for the one or more transactions with the specified cost savings goal to conduct a baseline cost savings analysis.

Claims (75)

1. A computer-implemented cost savings analysis system, comprising:

one or more databases storing historical transaction data;

a server system coupled to the one or more databases, the server system operable to:

receive a user input specifying a cost savings goal for one or more transactions; and

access the historical transaction data within the one or more databases needed to generate a baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, wherein the baseline price is generated based on data selected from the group consisting of the historical transaction data and data manually input by an authorized user; and

an analysis module coupled with the server system, the analysis module operable to:

determine the historical transaction data to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions;

responsive to a determination that the historical transaction data exists to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, generate the baseline price based on the historical transaction data for each of the one or more transactions that the historical transaction data exists;

responsive to a determination that the historical transaction data does not exist to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, generate the baseline price according to manual input by the authorized user for each of the one or more transactions that the historical transaction data does not exist, wherein the authorized user is required to provide a reason for the baseline price;

determine a weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions based on the specified cost savings goal for the one or more transactions and a percentage of total costs an organization allocates to a transaction type associated with each of the one or more transactions;

determine a variation between the generated baseline price and an actual price for each of the one or more transactions, wherein the actual price reflects a per-item price for each of the one or more transactions;

compare the determined variations for each of the one or more transactions with the weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions;

generate a cost savings result of the comparison of the determined variations for each of the one or more transactions and the weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions; and

alert the user when the generated cost savings result reaches a certain threshold.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the specified cost savings goal comprises a monetary amount or a percentage relative to a baseline price; and

the determined variations comprise monetary amounts or percentages relative to the generated baseline price.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the specified cost savings goal is for a particular combination of one or more items, suppliers, time frames, units within an organization, or personnel within an organization.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the generated baseline price is selected from the group consisting of an average rolling twelve-month price, an average year-to-date price, an average previous calendar year price, and a last paid price.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more databases containing the historical transaction data comprise relational databases.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis module is further operable to access the historical transaction data, generate the baseline price, determine the variations for the one or more transactions corresponding to the specified cost savings goal, and compare the determined variations for the one or more transactions with the specified cost savings goal by causing one or more scripts designed for these activities to be executed.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the server system is further operable to monitor the determined variations and alert a user when at least one variation reaches a corresponding threshold.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the server system is further operable to access one or more classes within an object-oriented database system to generate one or more objects for conducting the cost savings analysis, each class comprising one or more properties for defining an object, each generated object comprising values for one or more of the properties within a corresponding class, the values being generated from one or more of the following:

the first input;

the second input;

the historical transaction data; and

one or more other generated objects.

9. A computer-implemented method for conducting a cost savings analysis, comprising:

receiving, by a server, a user input specifying a cost savings goal for one or more transactions;

accessing, by the server, historical transaction data within one or more databases needed to generate a baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, wherein the baseline price is generated based on data selected from the group consisting of the historical transaction data and data manually input by an authorized user;

determining, by an analysis module linked to the server, the historical transaction data to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions;

responsive to a determination that the historical transaction data exists to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, generating the baseline price based on the historical transaction data for each of the one or more transactions that the historical transaction data exists;

responsive to a determination that the historical transaction data does not exist to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, generating the baseline price according to manual input by the authorized user for each of the one or more transactions that the historical transaction data does not exist, wherein the authorized user is required to provide a reason for the baseline price;

determining, by the analysis module, a weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions based on the specified cost savings goal for the one or more transactions and a percentage of total costs an organization allocates to a transaction type associated with each of the one or more transactions;

determining, by the analysis module, a variation between the generated baseline price and an actual price for each of the one or more transactions, wherein the actual price reflects a per-item price for each of the one or more transactions;

comparing, by the analysis module, the determined variations for each of the one or more transactions with the weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions;

generating, by the analysis module, a cost savings result of the comparison of the determined variations for each of the one or more transactions and the weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions; and

alerting, by the analysis module, the user when the generated cost savings result reaches a certain threshold.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein:

the specified cost savings goal comprises a monetary amount or a percentage relative to a baseline price; and

the determined variations comprise monetary amounts or percentages relative to the generated baseline price.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the specified cost savings goal is for a particular combination of one or more items, suppliers, time frames, units within an organization, or personnel within an organization.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the generated baseline price is selected from the group consisting of an average rolling twelve-month price, an average year-to-date price, an average previous calendar year price, and a last paid price.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more databases containing the historical transaction data comprise relational databases.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein accessing the historical transaction data, generating the baseline price, determining the variation for the one or more transactions corresponding to the specified cost savings goal, and comparing the determined variations for the one or more transactions with the specified cost savings goal comprises causing one or more scripts designed for these activities to be executed.

15. The method of claim 9 , further comprising monitoring the determined variations and alerting a user when at least one variation reaches a corresponding threshold.

16. The method of claim 9 , further comprising accessing one or more classes within an object-oriented database system to generate one or more objects for conducting the cost savings analysis, each class comprising one or more properties for defining an object, each generated object comprising values for one or more of the properties within a corresponding class, the values being generated from one or more of the following:

the first input;

the second input;

the historical transaction data; and

one or more other generated objects.

17. A computer-readable storage medium storing a plurality of instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method for conducting a cost savings analysis comprising:

receiving a user input specifying a cost savings goal for one or more transactions;

accessing historical transaction data within one or more databases needed to generate a baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, wherein the baseline price is generated based on data selected from the group consisting of the historical transaction data and data manually input by an authorized user;

determining the historical transaction data to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions;

responsive to a determination that the historical transaction data exists to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, generating the baseline price based on the historical transaction data for each of the one or more transactions that the historical transaction data exists;

responsive to a determination that the historical transaction data does not exist to generate the baseline price for each of the one or more transactions, generating the baseline price according to manual input by the authorized user for each of the one or more transactions that the historical transaction data does not exist, wherein the authorized user is required to provide a reason for the baseline price;

determining a weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions based on the specified cost savings goal for the one or more transactions and a percentage of total costs an organization allocates to a transaction type associated with each of the one or more transactions;

determining a variation between the generated baseline price and an actual price for each of the one or more transactions, wherein the actual price reflects a per-item price for each of the one or more transactions;

comparing the determined variations for each of the one or more transactions with the weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions;

generating a cost savings result of the comparison of the determined variations for each of the one or more transactions and the weighted cost savings goal for each of the one or more transactions; and

alerting the user when the generated cost savings result reaches a certain threshold.

18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein:

the specified cost savings goal comprises a monetary amount or a percentage relative to a baseline price; and

the determined variations comprise monetary amounts or percentages relative to the generated baseline price.

19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the specified cost savings goal is for a particular combination of one or more items, suppliers, time frames, units within an organization, or personnel within an organization.

20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the generated baseline price is selected from the group consisting of an average rolling twelve-month price, an average year-to-date price, an average previous calendar year price, and a last paid price.

21. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the one or more databases containing the historical transaction data comprise relational databases.

22. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , operable to access the historical transaction data, generate the specified baseline price, determine the variation for the one or more transactions corresponding to the specified cost savings goal, and compare the determined variations for the one or more transactions with the specified cost savings goal by causing one or more scripts designed for these activities to be executed.

23. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , further operable to monitor the determined variations and alert a user when at least one variation reaches a corresponding threshold.

24. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , further operable to access one or more classes within an object-oriented database system to generate one or more objects for conducting the cost savings analysis, each class comprising one or more properties for defining an object, each generated object comprising values for one or more of the properties within a corresponding class, the values being generated from one or more of the following:

the first input;

the second input;

the historical transaction data; and

one or more other generated objects.

Assignments (17)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053383/0117) Recorded Nov 3, 2021
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 058794/0776 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 16, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.; BLUE YONDER, INC.; JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC.; I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC; MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC.; MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC.; REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC; JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC.; REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION; BY BOND FINANCE, INC.; BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC.; BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 057724/0593 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REEL 026468 FRAME NUMBER FROM 0199 TO 0119 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 055136 FRAME 0623. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 19, 2021
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 056813/0110 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 026740 FRAME: 0676. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 8, 2021
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 055257/0747 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026468 FRAME 0199. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME FROM I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. TO JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.. Recorded Dec 12, 2020
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 055136/0623 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 3, 2020
From: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053383/0117 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 14, 2020
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 052392/0604 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0809 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0356 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: RP CROWN PARENT, LLC; RP CROWN HOLDING LLC; JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040326/0449 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0697 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0053 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0697 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0809 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Recorded Dec 21, 2012
From: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 029529/0812 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 12, 2011
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 026740/0676 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2011
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC
Reel/Frame 026468/0119 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 4, 2011
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 026072/0353 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 10, 2002
From: PRAKASH, BALASUBRAMANIAN ARUN
To: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 012895/0614 →