IP Library Granted Patent US 7,024,163
Granted Patent B1
US 7,024,163 · App. 09/967,858 · Granted Apr 4, 2006

Method and apparatus for adjusting feedback of a remote unit

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,024,163
App. No.
09/967,858
Granted
Apr 4, 2006
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and apparatus implementing spatial processing in a remote unit. In general, in one aspect, the present invention provides a remote unit, that includes a plurality of antennas and a spatial processing unit coupled to the plurality of antennas. The remote unit also includes a performance determination unit to determine a performance of the remote unit and a feedback adjustment unit to adjust feedback transmitted from the remote unit to a device, wherein the adjusted feedback accounts for performance associated with the spatial processing unit.

Claims (31)

1. A method for increasing performance of a remote unit that includes an antenna array and is operable in a spatial processing mode, the method comprising:

operating in a non-spatial processing mode;

determining a first performance level, the first performance level associated with the non-spatial processing mode;

determining a second performance level, the second performance level associated with the spatial processing mode;

determining a relative performance gain from a relative difference between the first and second performance level; and

adjusting feedback transmitted from the remote unit to a base station, the adjusting being based on the determined relative performance gain.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the remote unit supports one or more types of requested service, and wherein adjusting the feedback includes adjusting feedback depending on the type of requested service.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing a user interface for receiving user input specifying criteria for when to adjust feedback, wherein adjusting feedback includes adjusting feedback in accordance with the criteria.

4. A remote unit, comprising:

a plurality of antennas having diversity;

a spatial processing apparatus, the spatial processing apparatus including a plurality of antennas, a plurality of receive paths coupled to the plurality of antennas, a spatial processor coupled to the plurality of received paths;

a performance determination unit to determine a performance level of the remote unit, the performance determination unit coupled to the spatial processing apparatus;

a power conservation unit to selectively increase or decrease power consumed by at least a portion of the spatial processing apparatus based on the performance determined by the performance determination unit; and

a feedback adjustment unit to adjust feedback transmitted from the remote unit based on a relative performance gain associated with the spatial processing apparatus, wherein the relative performance gain associated with the spatial processing apparatus is based upon a relative difference in performance level between enabling and disabling at least a portion of the spatial processing apparatus.

5. The remote unit of claim 4 , wherein antennas of at least a subset of the plurality of antennas have different characteristics relative to one another.

6. The remote unit of claim 4 , wherein the determined performance level is based on metrics of signal quality.

7. The remote unit of claim 4 , wherein the determined performance level is based on frame error rate.

8. The remote unit of claim 4 , wherein the determined performance level is based on bit error rate.

9. The remote unit of claim 4 , wherein the determined performance level is based on received signal strength.

10. The remote unit of claim 5 , wherein the different antenna characteristics is caused by each of the subset having different orientations.

11. The remote unit of claim 5 , wherein the different antenna characteristics is caused by each of the subset having a different material composition.

12. The remote unit of claim 5 , wherein the different antenna characteristics is caused by each of the subset having different shapes.

13. The remote unit of claim 5 , wherein the different antenna characteristics is caused by antennas in the subset being physically separated relative to each other.

14. A machine-readable medium having stored thereon data representing instructions that, when executed by a processor of a remote unit that includes an antenna array and is operable in a spatial processing mode, causes the remote unit to perform operations comprising:

operating in a non-spatial processing mode;

determining a first performance level, the first performance level associated with the non-spatial processing mode;

determining a second performance level, the second performance level associated with the spatial processing mode;

determining a relative performance gain from a relative difference between the first and second performance level; and

adjusting feedback transmitted from the remote unit to a base station, the adjusting being based on the determined relative performance gain.

15. The machine-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the remote unit supports one or more types of requested service, and wherein adjusting the feedback includes adjusting feedback depending on the type of requested service.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2008
From: ARRAYCOMM LLC
To: INTEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 021794/0107 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 017088 FRAME 0941. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE IS AN ASSIGNMENT AND NOT A CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Oct 1, 2008
From: ARRAYCOMM, INC.
To: ARRAYCOMM LLC.
Reel/Frame 021619/0539 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 2, 2005
From: ARRAYCOMM, INC.
To: ARRAYCOMM LLC.
Reel/Frame 017088/0941 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2002
From: BARRATT, CRAIG H; PARISH, DAVID M.; SIFFERMAN, STEPHEN J.
To: ARRAYCOMM, INC.
Reel/Frame 012541/0596 →