IP Library Granted Patent US 6,937,843
Granted Patent B2
US 6,937,843 · App. 10/005,506 · Granted Aug 30, 2005

Wireless communication system with interference compensation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,937,843
App. No.
10/005,506
Granted
Aug 30, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus to compensate for interference between signals within a wireless communication system using dirty paper coding to compensate for interference on the downlink and multi-user detection to compensate for interference on uplink.

Claims (42)

1. A method for use in at least a portion of a wireless communication system in which downlink signals are communicated from at least one of one or more base stations to respective ones of a plurality of terminals, and unlink signals are communicated to at least one of one or more base stations from respective ones of a plurality of terminals, the method comprising the steps of:

using dirty paper coding to compensate for interference among the downlink signals,

using multi-user detection to compensate for interference among the uplink signals, wherein the compensation for the downlink signals is performed using a first order of the terminals that defines which terminals' downlink signals are used to compensate for interference in which other terminals' downlink signals, and

the compensation for the uplink signals is performed using a second order of the terminals that defines which terminals' uplink signals are used to compensate for interference in which other terminals' uplink signals.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second order is based on at least one different criterion than the first order.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first order is based on at least one of the following criteria:

the order in which the terminals of the plurality initiated a communication session with the one or more base stations;

the reverse of the order in which the terminals of the plurality initiated a communication session with the one or more base stations;

the respective amounts of data to be transmitted between the terminals and the one or more base stations; and

randomness.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second order is based on at least one of the following criteria:

the order in which the terminals of the plurality initiated a communication session

with the one or more base stations;

the reverse of the order in which the terminals of the plurality initiated a communication session with the one or more base stations;

the respective amounts of data to be transmitted between the terminals and the one or more base stations; and

randomness.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first order is defined by:

a) identifying an individual one of the terminals for which a certain operating parameter value would be optimal in the absence of interference from the other terminals in the plurality;

b) assigning the individual terminal in step a) to have an index of 1;

c) identifying another individual one of the terminals for which the certain operating parameter value would be optimal in the presence of interference from the assigned terminals in the plurality and in the absence of interference from unassigned terminals in the plurality;

d) assigning the individual terminal in step c) to have the next unassigned index in the order; and

e) repeating steps c) and d) until all of the terminals in the plurality are assigned an index in the order.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein:

the operating parameter comprises data rate; and

the optimal operating parameter value is the data rate having the highest magnitude of the data rates of the respective terminals.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one other operating parameter of the terminals is fixed.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second order is defined by:

a) identifying an individual one of the terminals for which a certain operating parameter value would be optimal in the absence of interference from the other terminals in the plurality;

b) assigning the individual terminal in step a) to have an index of one;

c) identifying another individual one of the terminals for which the certain operating parameter value would be optimal in the presence of interference from the assigned terminals in the plurality and in the absence of interference from unassigned terminals in the plurality;

d) assigning the individual terminal in step c) to have the next yet unassigned index in the order; and

e) repeating steps c) and d) until all of the terminals in the plurality are assigned an index in the order.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the operating parameter comprises data rate; and

the optimal operating parameter value is the data rate having the highest magnitude of the data rates of the respective terminals.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein at least one other operating parameter of the terminals is fixed.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein, in the portion, signals are communicated between at least one of the one or more base stations and a respective one of a second plurality of terminals, and the method further comprises the step of:

using a compensation scheme to compensate for interference among the signals from the at least one of the one or more base stations to the second plurality of terminals.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the other compensation scheme comprises multi-user detection.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein, in the portion, signals are communicated between at least one of the one or more base stations and a respective one of a second plurality of terminals, and the method further comprises the step of:

using a compensation scheme to compensate for interference among the signals to the at least one of the one or more base stations from the second plurality of terminals.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the terminals are mobile terminals.

Assignments (13)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2023
From: RPX CORPORATION
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063429/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 28, 2021
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059352/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 058363/0723 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES LLC
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 058983/0104 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 14, 2019
From: NOKIA USA INC.
To: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.
Reel/Frame 048370/0682 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 7, 2019
From: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 049887/0613 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY; NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS BV; ALCATEL LUCENT SAS
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 043877/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
To: NOKIA USA INC.
Reel/Frame 043879/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP, LLC
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 043967/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 033950/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2013
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 030510/0627 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 19, 2002
From: JAFAR, SYED ALI
To: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 012746/0749 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2002
From: FOSCHINI, GERARD J
To: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 012699/0239 →