IP Library Granted Patent US 7,203,348
Granted Patent B1
US 7,203,348 · App. 10/054,437 · Granted Apr 10, 2007

Method and apparatus for correction of mammograms for non-uniform breast thickness

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,203,348
App. No.
10/054,437
Granted
Apr 10, 2007
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method and apparatus for correcting for a distortion in a mammogram. The method comprises classifying pixels as either likely fat or likely not-fat. The method further comprises identifying a candidate distortion and calculating a histogram of the likely fat and the likely not-fat pixels at the candidate distortion. The method further comprises evaluating a quality of the candidate distortion based on features of the histograms of pixel values in the fat and dense tissue classes. The distortion may be a two dimensional tilt of the plates or a three dimensional deformation of the plates as in a bend.

Claims (152)

1. A method of correcting for a tilt in a mammogram, the method comprising:

classifying pixels as either likely fat or likely not-fat;

identifying a candidate tilt;

calculating a histogram of the likely fat and the likely not-fat pixels at the candidate tilt; and

evaluating a quality of the candidate tilt based on features of the histograms of pixel values in the fat and the not-fat tissue classes.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating the quality of the candidate tilt based on the features of the histograms comprises:

evaluating a quality of the candidate tilt based on a skew and variance of the histograms.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein evaluating the quality of the candidate tilt comprises calculating a weighted Mahalanobis distance between the likely fat and the likely not-fat distributions to determine a quality of the candidate tilt.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein evaluating the quality of the candidate tilt further comprises giving more weight to the variance of the fat distribution in the weighted Mahalanobis distance calculation.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein evaluating the quality of the candidate tilt further comprises using the skewness of the fat histogram to give a preference to distributions that are not skewed to the negative side.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein evaluating the quality of the candidate tilt further comprises adjusting the result to favor smaller tilts.

7. The method of claim 3 , wherein evaluating the quality of the candidate tilt comprises applying the equation:

D

(

p

x

,

p

y

)

=

m

d

-

m

f

(

0.7

var

f

+

0.3

var

d

)

+

0.5

inf

(

0

,

skew

f

)

-

0.1

p

x

-

0.1

p

y

.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the candidate tilt comprises identifying a first set of candidate tilts, based on an expected tilt distribution.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising identifying a subsequent set of candidate tilts, based on the best tilt identified in a previous iteration, to provide more accurate tilt.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein classifying pixels as either likely fat or likely not-fat comprises:

generating a smoothed image;

subtracting the smoothed image from an original image; and

determining whether pixels are convex to classify the pixels as likely not-fat, or concave to classify the pixels as likely fat.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the pixels are classified individually.

12. An apparatus to correct a tilt in a mammogram comprising:

a dense/fat classifier to classify pixels as either likely fat or likely not-fat;

a candidate tilt identifier to identify a candidate tilt; and

a histogram creator to calculate a histogram of the likely fat and the likely not-fat pixels at the candidate tilt; and

a tilt quality evaluator to evaluate a quality of the candidate tilt based on features of the histograms of pixel values in the fat and the dense tissue classes.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the tilt quality evaluator uses a skew and variance of the histograms to evaluate the tilt quality.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the tilt quality evaluator further comprises a Mahalanobis calculator to calculate a weighted Mahalanobis distance between the likely fat and the likely not-fat distributions to determine a quality of the candidate tilt.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the tilt quality evaluator further comprises a quality calculator to give more weight to the variance of the fat distribution in the weighted Mahalanobis distance calculation.

16. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the tilt quality evaluator further comprises a quality calculator to use the skewness of the fat histogram to give a preference to distributions that are not skewed to the negative side.

17. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the tilt quality evaluator further comprises a quality calculator to adjust the result to favor smaller tilts.

18. The apparatus of claim 14 , the tilt quality evaluator evaluates the tilt quality using the following equation:

D

(

p

x

,

p

y

)

=

m

d

-

m

f

(

0.7

var

f

+

0.3

var

d

)

+

0.5

inf

(

0

,

skew

f

)

-

0.1

p

x

-

0.1

p

y

.

19. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the candidate tilt identifier to identify a first set of candidate tilts, based on an expected tilt distribution.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , the candidate tilt identifier further to identify a subsequent set of candidate tilts, based on the best tilt identified in a previous iteration, to provide more accurate tilt.

21. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the dense/fat classifier comprises:

a smooth image generator to generate a smoothed image;

a delta calculator to subtract the smoothed image from an original image; and

a pixel classifier to determine whether pixels are convex to classify the pixels as likely not-fat, or concave to classify the pixels as likely fat.

22. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein the pixels are classified individually.

23. An apparatus comprising:

an image receiver to receive a digitized mammogram image, the digitized mammogram image representing a mammogram taken with non-parallel imaging plates;

a tilt corrector to evaluate a plurality of candidate tilts designed to correct for the non-parallel imaging plates;

an image adjustor to adjust the digitized mammogram image in accordance with a best candidate tilt; and

an output mechanism to output the corrected mammogram image, the corrected mammogram image used for computer aided diagnosis to detect abnormalities in the corrected mammogram image.

24. The apparatus of claim 23 , wherein the tilt corrector comprises:

a dense/fat classifier to classify pixels as either likely fat or likely not-fat;

a candidate tilt identifier to identify a candidate tilt; and

a histogram creator to calculate a histogram of the likely fat and the likely not-fat pixels at the candidate tilt; and

a tilt quality evaluator to evaluate a quality of the candidate tilt based on features of the histograms of pixel values in the fat and the dense tissue classes.

25. The apparatus of claim 24 wherein the tilt quality evaluator evaluates the quality of the candidate tilt based on a skew and variance of the histograms.

Assignments (10)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE INCORRECT PATENT NO. 8081301 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 035820 FRAME: 0239. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST RELEASE. Recorded Nov 9, 2017
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: HOLOGIC, INC.; BIOLUCENT, LLC; CYTYC CORPORATION; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; THIRD WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 044727/0529 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE INCORRECT PATENT NO. 8081301 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 028810 FRAME: 0745. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT. Recorded Nov 9, 2017
From: HOLOGIC, INC.; BIOLUCENT, LLC; CYTYC CORPORATION; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; THIRD WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
Reel/Frame 044432/0565 →
SECURITY INTEREST RELEASE REEL/FRAME 028810/0745 Recorded Jun 4, 2015
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: HOLOGIC, INC.; BIOLUCENT, LLC; CYTYC CORPORATION; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; THIRD WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 035820/0239 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 1, 2012
From: HOLOGIC, INC.; BIOLUCENT, LLC; CYTYC CORPORATION; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; THIRD WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
Reel/Frame 028810/0745 →
TERMINATION OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS Recorded Aug 25, 2010
From: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: HOLOGIC, INC.; R2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; BIOLUCENT, LLC; DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY CORP.; CYTYC CORPORATION; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS III, INC.; CYTYC PRENATAL PRODUCTS CORP.; THIRD WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 024944/0315 →
21ST SUPPLEMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 29, 2010
From: HOLOGIC, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 024151/0435 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 8, 2009
From: R2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: HOLOGIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 023620/0362 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 29, 2008
From: R2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 021301/0838 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 26, 2007
From: R2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.
Reel/Frame 020024/0231 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2002
From: KARSSEMEIJER, NICOLAAS; SCHNEIDER, ALEXANDER C.
To: R2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 012524/0956 →