IP Library Granted Patent US 7,003,503
Granted Patent B2
US 7,003,503 · App. 10/071,685 · Granted Feb 21, 2006

Ranking items

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,003,503
App. No.
10/071,685
Granted
Feb 21, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of ranking items includes displaying a set of categories. Each category has a set of weights for a user to choose. Each item is associated with the set of categories. The method also includes displaying a search result based on the weights chosen by the user. The search result includes a ranking of the items.

Claims (69)

1. A method of ranking sources of products or services, the method comprising:

displaying, on a display, a plurality of categories, each category of the plurality of categories having a set of weights for a user to choose in order to weight the importance of the categories, each category further including at least one user selectable factor, each of the sources of products or services being associated with the set of categories;

calculating, in a computer system, a total score for each of the sources of products or services, based on the user defined weights and user selected factors for each category;

determining, in the computer system, a ranking for each of the sources of products or services based on the total score for each of the sources of products or services; and

displaying, on the display, a result including a ranking of the sources of products or services related to the total scores of the sources of products or services.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using each category as an area of social responsibility.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

displaying a set of factors for each category when selected by the user, each factor capable of being chosen by the user; and

collating the categories weighted by the user, the factors chosen by the user, and a product chosen by the user.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

selecting a list of companies that have the product; and

determining a rating for each company based on the categories weighted by the user and the factors chosen by the user.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein selecting a list of companies comprises:

finding a set of brands associated with the product; and

finding the company associated with each brand.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein displaying a search result comprises

displaying the search result based on the factors chosen by the user.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein displaying a search result comprises ranking the brands on a five-star scale, the five-star scale including a one-star rating, a two-star rating, a three-star rating, a four-star rating, and a five-star rating.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising using the five-star ranking as the highest of the ratings determined and the one-star ranking as the lowest of the ratings determined.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving information from an external database; and

quantifying the data on a scale.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein displaying a search result comprises displaying a ranking of companies.

11. An apparatus comprising:

a memory that stores executable instructions for ranking sources of products or services items based on a set of user preferences; and

a processor that executes instructions to:

display, on a display, a plurality of categories, each category of the plurality of categories having a set of weights for a user to choose in order to weight the importance of the categories, each category further including at least one user selectable factor, each of the sources of products or services being associated with the set of categories;

calculate, in a computer system, a total score for each of the sources of products or services, based on the user defined weights and user selected factors for each category;

determine, in the computer system, a ranking for each of the sources of products or services based on the total score for each of the sources of products or services; and

display, on the display, a result including a ranking of the sources of products or services related to the total scores of the sources of products or services.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , further comprising instructions to use each category as an area of social responsibility.

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , further comprising instructions to:

display a set of factors for each category when selected by the user, each factor capable of being chosen by the user; and

collate the categories weighted by the user, the factors chosen by the user, and a product chosen by the user.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , further comprising instructions to:

select a list of companies that have the product; and

determine a rating for each company based on the categories weighted by the user and the factors chosen by the user.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein instructions to select a list of companies comprises instructions to:

find a set of brands associated with the product; and

find the company associated with each brand.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein instructions to display a search result comprises instructions to display the search result based on the factors chosen by the user.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein instructions to display a search result comprises instructions to rank the brands on a five-star scale, the five-star scale including a one-star rating, a two-star rating, a three-star rating, a four-star rating, and a five-star rating.

18. The apparatus of claim 17 , further comprising instructions to use the five-star ranking as the highest of the ratings determined and the one-star ranking as the lowest of the ratings determined.

19. The apparatus of claim 11 , further comprising instructions to:

receive information from an external database; and

quantify the data on a scale.

20. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein instructions to display a search result comprises instructions to display a ranking of companies.

21. An article comprising a machine-readable medium that stores executable instructions for ranking sources of products or services based on a set of user preferences, the instructions causing a machine to:

display, on a display, a plurality of categories, each category of the plurality of categories having a set of weights for a user to choose in order to weight the importance of the categories, each category further including at least one user selectable factor, each of the sources of products or services being associated with the set of categories;

calculate, in a computer system, a total score for each of the sources of products or services, based on the user defined weights and user selected factors for each category;

determine, in the computer system, a ranking for each of the sources of products or services based on the total score for each of the sources of products or services; and

display, on the display, a result including a ranking of the sources of products or services related to the total scores of the sources of products or services.

22. The article of claim 21 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to use each category as an area of social responsibility.

23. The article of claim 21 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to:

display a set of factors for each category when selected by the user, each factor capable of being chosen by the user; and

collate the categories weighted by the user, the factors chosen by the user, and a product chosen by the user.

24. The article of claim 23 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to:

select a list of companies that have the product; and

determine a rating for each company based on the categories weighted by the user and the factors chosen by the user.

25. The article of claim 24 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to select a list of companies comprises executable instructions causing a machine to:

find a set of brands associated with the product; and

find the company associated with each brand.

26. The article of claim 25 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to display a search result comprises executable instructions causing a machine to display the search result based on the factors chosen by the user.

27. The article of claim 26 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to display a search result comprises executable instructions causing a machine to rank the brands on a five-star scale, the five-star scale including a one-star rating, a two-star rating, a three-star rating, a four-star rating, and a five-star rating.

28. The article of claim 27 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to use the five-star ranking as the highest of the ratings determined and the one-star ranking as the lowest of the ratings determined.

29. The article of claim 21 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to:

receive information from an external database; and

quantify the data on a scale.

30. The article of claim 21 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to display a search result comprises executable instructions causing a machine to display a ranking of companies.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2021
From: BARINGS FINANCE LLC
To: INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES INC.; INVESTOR RESPONSIBILITY RESEARCH CENTER, INC.; IDEALSWORK, INC.; ASSET INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BRIGHTSCOPE, INC.; MARKET METRICS, LLC; VISS INTERMEDIATE LLC; SECURITIES CLASS ACTION SERVICES, LLC; ISS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, INC.; CONFLICT SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP, INC.; STRATEGIC INSIGHT HOLDINGS, LLC; STRATEGIC INSIGHT INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS INC.
Reel/Frame 055587/0586 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT AT REEL/FRAME NO. 48512/0188 Recorded Feb 25, 2021
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 055428/0013 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 048512/0188 →
SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 048512/0434 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 44214/0919 Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 048512/0561 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 44214/0868 Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 048512/0612 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 044214/0868 →
SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 044214/0919 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS FIRST LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 044293/0434 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS SECOND LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 044297/0001 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 9, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041670/0931 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 9, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041670/0954 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2002
From: CROSBY, WILL; PORTER, DAN
To: IDEALSWORK INC.
Reel/Frame 012879/0907 →