IP Library Granted Patent US 6,912,331
Granted Patent B2
US 6,912,331 · App. 10/096,297 · Granted Jun 28, 2005

Periodic electromagnetic waveguide structures with controlled polarization properties

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,912,331
App. No.
10/096,297
Granted
Jun 28, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

By judicious engineering of grating parameters such as tooth shape, duty cycle and phase offset, the grating strengths and effective indices of the polarization modes of a grated waveguide are adjusted over a wide range of values to achieve a desired level of polarization sensitivity, or insensitivity. In the typical example, the physical geometry of the grating teeth is adjusted so that degenerate behavior (n TE =n TM and κ TE =κ TM ) is obtained for two polarization modes; the effective refractive indices and grating strengths are matched for the TE and TM polarization modes. In the current embodiment the sidewall gratings are used in which the tooth profile is selected in order to equalize the grating strength for each polarization mode.

Claims (39)

1. A planar waveguide comprising at least one grating along the direction of propagation in which grating teeth have a non-square profile to control a polarization sensitivity of the waveguide.

2. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a length of a base of the teeth is different from a length of a top of the teeth.

3. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a length of a base of the teeth is greater than a length of a top of the teeth.

4. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 , wherein an effective index of the waveguide is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

5. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 , wherein strength of the grating is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

6. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a profile of the teeth is generally trapezoidal.

7. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 6 further comprising fillets at intersections between the teeth and a waveguide body.

8. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 further comprising chamfers at tops of the teeth.

9. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 wherein one grating is formed on each of at least two sides of the waveguide.

10. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 1 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

11. A planar waveguide comprising at least two gratings with the same period that are phase-shifted relative to each other, wherein an effective index of the waveguide is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

12. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 11 , wherein strength of the grating is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

13. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 11 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

14. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 11 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

15. A planar waveguide comprising at least two gratings with the same period that are not phase-shifted relative to each other, wherein an effective index of the waveguide is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

16. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 15 , wherein strength of the grating is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

17. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 15 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

18. A planar waveguide as claimed in claim 15 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

19. A design process for a polarization insensitive grated waveguide, the process comprising:

balancing an index of refraction for each polarization mode by selecting a cross-section of the waveguide; and

balancing a strength of the grating for each polarization mode by selecting a non-square profile of grating teeth.

20. A design process as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the step of balancing the strength comprises selecting a profile in which a length of a base of the teeth is different from a length of a top of the teeth.

21. A design process as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the step of balancing the strength comprises selecting a profile in which a length of a base of the teeth is greater than a length of a top of the teeth.

22. A design process as claimed in claim 19 , wherein an effective index of the waveguide is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

23. A design process as claimed in claim 19 , wherein a strength of the grating is substantially the same for each polarization mode.

24. A design process as claimed in claim 23 , wherein the step of balancing the strength comprises selecting a profile in which the teeth are generally trapezoidal.

25. A design process as claimed in claim 19 wherein one grating is formed on each of at least two sides of the waveguide.

26. A design process as claimed in claim 19 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

27. A design process for a polarization insensitive grated waveguide, the process comprising:

balancing an index of refraction for each mode by selecting a cross-section of the waveguide; and

balancing a strength of the grating for each mode by selecting a non-50% duty cycle of grating teeth.

28. A design process for a polarization insensitive grated waveguide, the process comprising:

balancing an index or retraction for each mode by selecting a cross-section of the waveguide; and

balancing a grating strength for each mode by configuring the waveguide with two gratings and offsetting the phase of the gratings with respect to each other.

29. A design process as claimed in claim 28 wherein one grating is formed on each of at least two sides of the waveguide.

30. A design process as claimed in claim 28 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

31. A polarization controlled electromagnetic waveguide comprising a periodically varying index of refraction along the length of said waveguide, wherein the geometry of said periodically varying index is configured over each period such that the grating strength of each polarization mode is equal to a desired value and the effective indices of the polarization modes are equal to each other.

32. A polarization controlled electromagnetic waveguide as claimed in claim 31 wherein one grating is formed on each of at least two sides of the waveguide.

33. A polarization controlled electromagnetic waveguide as claimed in claim 31 wherein one grating is formed on each of two opposite sides of the waveguide.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2006
From: CAMBRIUS, INC.
To: AMPERSAND 2001 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 017448/0632 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 23, 2004
From: CLARENDON PHOTONICS, INC.
To: CAMBRIUS, INC.
Reel/Frame 016096/0754 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 2, 2002
From: CLARENDON PHOTONICS, INC.
To: PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 012839/0474 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2002
From: FRIED, DALE G.; VIENS, JEAN-FRANCOIS; FORESI, JAMES S.; SKOROBOGATIY, MAKSIM A.; LIM, MICHAEL H.
To: CLARENDON PHOTONICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 012696/0039 →