IP Library Granted Patent US 7,561,971
Granted Patent B2
US 7,561,971 · App. 10/109,094 · Granted Jul 14, 2009

Methods and devices relating to estimating classifier performance

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,561,971
App. No.
10/109,094
Granted
Jul 14, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and devices, including methods and devices for estimating classifier performance such as generalization performance, are disclosed. One method includes providing multiple samples. Each sample is characterized by one or more features. This method also includes associating a feature variability with at least one of the one or more features; and computing a first probability of misclassification by a first classifier using the feature variability. Devices, including integrated circuits (ICs) and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), that are configured for use in carrying out the present methods are also disclosed.

Claims (38)

1. A computer-implemented method for estimating performance of a classifier comprising:

using suitably programmed hardware to associate a feature variability with at least one of one or more features that characterize a sample from multiple samples, each of which is characterized by one or more features;

using the classifier to compute, with the hardware, one or more scores for one or more samples in a subset of samples from the multiple samples, where the classifier can be used to determine a class to which a sample belongs based on the one or more features that characterize that sample;

using the hardware to associate a score variability with at least one of the one or more scores using the feature variability;

computing, with the hardware, a probability of misclassification by the classifier using one or more of the one or more scores and the score variability; and

outputting the probability of misclassification, or a score indicative of the probability of misclassification, to a user.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , where the multiple samples are multiple tissue samples.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , where the classifier is a linear discriminant function classifier.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , where the classifier is a quadratic discriminant function classifier.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , where the classifier is a neural network classifier.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , where the feature variability is estimated using multiple measurements of one of the one or more features.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , where the using hardware to associate a score variability with at least one of the one or more scores includes using a linear approximation of the classifier.

8. A physical computer readable medium comprising machine-readable instructions for implementing the computer-implemented method of claim 1 .

9. A computer-implemented method comprising:

using suitably programmed hardware to associate a feature variability with at least one of one or more features on a feature-by-feature basis, the one or more features characterizing a sample from multiple samples, each of which is characterized by one or more features;

computing, with the hardware, a first probability of misclassification by a neural network classifier using the feature variability; and

computing, with the hardware, a first probability of misclassification by a classifier using the feature variability, where the classifier can be used to determine a class to which a sample belongs based on the one or more features that characterize that sample; and

outputting the first probability of misclassification, or a score indicative of the first probability of misclassification, to a user.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , where the multiple samples are multiple tissue samples.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , where the feature variability is estimated using multiple measurements of one of the one or more features.

12. computer-implemented method comprising:

using suitably programmed hardware to associate a feature variability with at least one of one or more features on a feature-by-feature basis, the one or more features characterizing a sample from multiple samples, each of which is characterized by one or more features;

computing, with the hardware, a first probability of misclassification by a first classifier using the feature variability, where the first classifier can be used to determine a class to which a sample belongs based on the one or more features that characterize that sample; and

outputting the first probability of misclassification, or a score indicative of the first probability of misclassification, to a user;

where the computing, with the hardware, a first probability of misclassification by a first classifier includes using a linear approximation of the first classifier prior to compute the first probability of misclassification.

13. A physical computer readable medium comprising machine-readable instructions for implementing the computer-implemented method of any of claims 9 , 10 , 11 , and 12 .

14. A computer-implemented method for estimating performance of a classifier comprising:

using suitably programmed hardware to associate a feature variability with at least one of one or more features that characterize a sample from multiple samples, each of which is characterized by one or more features;

using a first classifier to compute, with the hardware, one or more first scores for one or more first samples in a subset of samples from the multiple samples, where the first classifier can be used to determine a class to which a sample belongs based on the one or more features that characterize that sample;

using the hardware to associate a first score variability with at least one of the one or more first scores using the feature variability;

computing, with the hardware, a first probability of misclassification by the first classifier using one or more of the one or more first scores and the first score variability;

using a second classifier to compute, with the hardware, one or more second scores for one or more second samples in a subset of samples from the multiple samples, where the second classifier can be used to determine a class to which a sample belongs based on the one or more features that characterize that sample;

using the hardware to associate a second score variability with at least one of the one or more second scores using the feature variability;

computing, with the hardware, a second probability of misclassification by the second classifier using one or more of the one or more second scores and the second score variability;

determining, with the hardware, a final probability of misclassification from a group of probabilities of misclassification that includes the first and second probabilities of misclassification; and

outputting the final probability of misclassification, or a score indicative of the final probability of misclassification, to a user.

15. A physical computer readable medium comprising machine-readable instructions for implementing the computer-implemented method of any of claims 2 - 7 .

16. A physical computer readable medium comprising machine-readable instructions for implementing the computer-implemented method of claim 14 .

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2025
From: NEW MEXICO MEZZANINE PARTERSN, L.P.; NEW MEXICO CO-INVESTMENT FUND, L.P.
To: EXAGEN INC.
Reel/Frame 072159/0497 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 25, 2025
From: EXAGEN INC.
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP
Reel/Frame 070952/0802 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2017
From: CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II L.P.; CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II - PARALLEL FUND "A" L.P.; PARALLEL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES PARTNERS II L.P.
To: EXAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 043784/0828 →
SHORT-FORM PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 15, 2013
From: EXAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
To: CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II L.P.; CAPITAL ROYALTY PARTNERS II - PARALLEL FUND "A" L.P.; PARALLEL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES PARTNERS II L.P.
Reel/Frame 031414/0660 →