IP Library Granted Patent US 6,858,103
Granted Patent B2
US 6,858,103 · App. 10/151,224 · Granted Feb 22, 2005

Method of optimizing heat treatment of alloys by predicting thermal growth

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,858,103
App. No.
10/151,224
Granted
Feb 22, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention discloses a method for optimizing heat treatment of precipitation-hardened alloys having at least one precipitate phase by decreasing aging time and/or aging temperature using thermal growth predictions based on a quantitative model. The method includes predicting three values: a volume change in the precipitation-hardened alloy due to transformations in at least one precipitation phase, an equilibrium phase fraction of at least one precipitation phase, and a kinetic growth coefficient of at least one precipitation phase. Based on these three values and a thermal growth model, the method predicts thermal growth in a precipitation-hardened alloy. The thermal growth model is particularly suitable for Al—Si—Cu alloys used in aluminum alloy components. The present invention also discloses a method to predict heat treatment aging time and temperature necessary for dimensional stability without the need for inexact and costly trial and error measurements.

Claims (362)

1. A method for optimizing alloy heat treatment by quantitatively predicting thermal growth during alloy heat treatment, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) predicting a volume change due to transformations in an each precipitate phase;

(b) predicting an equilibrium phase fraction of the each precitate phase;

(c) predicting a kinetic growth coefficient of the each precipitate phase;

(d) predicting thermal growth in a precipitation-hardened Al —Si—Cu alloy according to a thermal growth model using the volume change due to transformations in the each precipitate phase; the equilibrium phase fraction of the each precipitate phase; and the kinetic growth coefficient of the each precipitate phase, wherein the thermal growth model may be expressed mathematically as:

g

(

t

,

T

)

=

(

1

-

γ

)

i

=

1

n

δ

V

i

3

V

i

f

i

(

t

,

T

)

where

δ

V

i

3

V

i

is volume change due to transformations in precipitate phase i,

ƒ i (t,T) is fraction of solute in precipitate phase i as a function of time and temperature,

T is temperature,

t is time, and

γ is fraction of solute lost to eutectic phases; and

(e) aging the precipitation-hardened Al—Si—Cu alloy for an aging time (t) and an aging temperature (T) according to the thermal growth model to produce a dimensionally stable precipitation-hardened Al—Si—Cu alloy.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the volume change due to transformations in precipitate phase i may be expressed mathematically as:

Δ

V

i

=

1

x

i

{

V

i

-

[

(

1

-

x

i

)

V

A

l

+

x

V

C

u

]

}

where V 1 is volume per atom in precipitation phase i,

x 1 is atomic fraction of Cu in precipitation phase i,

V Al is volume per atom Al, and

V Cu is volume per atom Cu.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the fraction of Cu in precipitate phase θ as a function of time and temperature may be expressed mathematically as:

ƒ 0 ( t,T )= f θ eq ( T )(1−exp[− k θ ( T )( t +Δ θ ) n θ ])

where ƒ θ eq (T) is equilibrium phase fraction of precipitate phase θ,

k θ (T) is kinetic growth coefficient of precipitate phase θ,

Δ θ is time shift applied to guarantee phase fraction continuity for precipitation phase θ, and

n θ is determined by at least precipitate morphology and nucleation rate for precipitation phase θ.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the time shift applied to guarantee phase fraction continuity for precipitation phase θ may be expressed mathematically as:

Δ

θ

=

-

1

k

θ

(

T

s

)

ln

[

1

-

f

θ

(

t

a

,

T

a

)

f

θ

eq

(

T

s

)

]

-

t

a

for

t

t

a

 Δ θ =0 for t<t a

where T t is in-service temperature,

T a is aging temperature, and

t a is time at which temperature changes from T n to T s .

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the kinetic growth coefficient of precipitate phase θ may be expressed mathematically as:

k

θ

(

T

)

=

0.43

exp

[

161

473

-

T

-

3.33

3

]

where T is temperature in degrees Kelvin, and

k θ (T) is the kinetic growth coefficient of precipitate phase θ in units of inverse hours.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the equilibrium phase fraction of precipitate phase θ may be expressed mathematically as:

f

θ

eq

(

T

)

=

0.01417

-

exp

[

-

11.6045

*

370.9

-

0.097

T

T

]

where T is temperature in degrees Kelvin.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the precipitation phases include at least the precipitate phase θ and the precipitate phase θ′.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the fraction of Cu in precipitate phase θ′ as a function of time and temperature may be expressed mathematically as:

ƒ θ′ ( t,T )=ƒ θ′ eq ( T )(1−exp[− k θ′ ( T )( t +Δ θ′ ) n θ′ ])−ƒ θ ( t,T )

where ƒ θ′ eq (T) is equilibrium phase fraction of precipitate phase θ′,

k θ′ (T) is kinetic growth coefficient of precipitate phase θ′,

Δ θ′ is time shift applied to guarantee phase fraction continuity for precipitation phase θ′, and

n θ′ is determined by at least precipitate morphology and nucleation rate for precipitation phase θ′, and

ƒ θ′ (t,T) is fraction of Cu in precipitate phase θ′ as a function of time and temperature; wherein

ƒ θ′ (t,T) is greater than or equal to zero.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the time shift applied to guarantee phase fraction continuity for precipitation phase θ′ may be expressed mathematically as:

Δ

θ

=

-

1

k

θ

(

T

s

)

ln

[

1

-

f

θ

(

t

a

,

T

a

)

f

θ

eq

(

T

s

)

]

-

t

a

 Δ θ′ =0 for t<t a

where T s is in-service temperature,

T n is aging temperature, and

t n is time at which temperature changes from T n to T s .

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the kinetic growth coefficient of precipitate phase θ′ may be expressed mathematically as:

k

θ

(

T

)

=

0.43

exp

[

-

11800

T

+

24.34

]

where T is temperature in degrees Kelvin, and

k θ′ (T) is the kinetic growth coefficient of precipitate phase θ′ in units of inverse hours.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the equilibrium phase fraction of precipitate phase θ′ may be expressed mathematically as:

f

θ

eq

(

T

)

=

0.01420

-

exp

[

-

11.6045

*

396.2

-

0.165

T

T

]

where T is temperature in degrees Kelvin.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicting steps (a), (b), and (c) use a combination of first-principles calculations, computational thermodynamics, and electron microscopy and diffraction techniques.

13. A method for optimizing alloy heal treatment, the method comprising the steps of:

defining a thermal growth for dimensional stability;

predicting a combination of an aging time and an aging temperature which yields the thermal growth for dimensional stability; and

aging a precipitation-hardened Al—Si—Cu alloy for about the predicted aging time and about the predicted aging temperature, wherein the predicting step uses a function of form:

g

(

t

,

T

)

=

(

1

-

γ

)

i

=

1

n

δ

V

i

3

V

i

f

i

(

t

,

T

)

wherein the function is inverted to solve for the predicted aging time and the predicted aging temperature based on a thermal growth of stability, and wherein aging for a combination of about the predicted aging time and about the predicted aging temperature produces a dimensionally stable precipitation-hardened Al—Si—Cu alloy.

Assignments (5)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 3, 2014
From: JAGUAR CARS LIMITED
To: JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED
Reel/Frame 033271/0106 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2008
From: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC (ONE-HALF INTEREST); JAGUAR CARS LIMITED (ONE-HALF INTEREST)
Reel/Frame 021109/0154 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 22, 2003
From: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 013987/0838 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2002
From: WOLVERTON, CHRISTOPHER M.; ALLISON, JOHN E.
To: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 012923/0127 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2002
From: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A MICHIGAN CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 012923/0139 →