IP Library Granted Patent US 7,440,911
Granted Patent B1
US 7,440,911 · App. 10/153,844 · Granted Oct 21, 2008

Distributed quote management

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,440,911
App. No.
10/153,844
Granted
Oct 21, 2008
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method for distributed quote management includes receiving a buyer request for quote (RFQ) from a buyer. The buyer RFQ requests a quote from a seller and identifies multiple items. The method includes automatically determining a best cost of each item in the buyer RFQ. The method includes automatically generating a quote for the buyer RFQ using the determined best costs of the items in the buyer RFQ. The method includes automatically generating a bid package for the buyer RFQ that includes the generated quote and automatically communicating the generated bid package to the buyer.

Claims (99)

1. A system for distributed quote management at a seller computer system, comprising:

one or more quote modules stored in a memory medium and collectively operable to:

receive a buyer request for quote (RFQ) from at least one buyer, the buyer RFQ requesting a quote from the seller computer system and identifying a plurality of items;

automatically access a buyer profile for the at least one buyer;

automatically determine whether historical quote data is available for at least one of the plurality of items;

if historical quote data is available, automatically determine a best cost of each of the plurality of items in the buyer RFQ according to the historical quote data;

if historical quote data is not available, automatically determine a best cost of each of the plurality of items in the buyer RFQ according to one or more contracts between the seller and one or more suppliers;

using the determined best costs of the plurality of items in the buyer RFQ, automatically generate a quote for the buyer RFQ;

automatically generate a bid package for the buyer RFQ that comprises the generated quote; and

automatically communicate the generated bid package to the at least one buyer.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to automatically match a buyer part number identifying an item in the buyer RFQ with one or more seller part numbers.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the buyer RFQ comprises one or more approved supplier lists, the quote module is further operable to automatically match a buyer supplier identifier in an approved supplier list in the buyer RFQ with one or more seller supplier identifiers.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to automatically determine a best cost of an item in the buyer RFQ according to one or more contracts between the buyer and one or more suppliers.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to automatically determine a best cost of an item in the buyer RFQ according to historical quote data associated with the item.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to automatically determine a best cost of an item in the buyer RFQ according to one or more contracts between the seller and one or more suppliers.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to:

determine whether an item in the buyer RFQ is available from an inventory of the seller;

access inventory price data for the item; and

determine a best cost of the item according to the accessed inventory price data for the item.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to:

automatically generate one or more seller RFQs requesting a quote from one or more suppliers for an item in the buyer RFQ;

automatically communicate the one or more generated seller RFQs to one or more suppliers;

receive one or more supplier responses to the one or more seller RFQs; and

automatically determine a best cost of the item according to the one or more received supplier responses to the one or more seller RFQs.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the quote module is further operable to:

receive one or more changes to the buyer RFQ from the at least one buyer after the bid package has been communicated to the at least one buyer;

generate a new bid package that incorporates the one or more changes into the bid package; and

communicate the new bid package to the at least one buyer.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to:

automatically access a buyer profile for the buyer; and

according the accessed buyer profile, automatically determine whether to generate the bid package for the buyer RFQ.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the buyer profile comprises a profile selected from the group consisting of:

one or more win ratios of the seller computer system with the at least one buyer;

one or more sales volumes between the seller computer system and the at least one buyer; and

one or more margins on sales between the seller computer system and the at least one buyer.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to:

automatically identify one or more up-sell or cross-sell opportunities associated with the item; and

automatically generate a bid package for the buyer RFQ that comprises the generated quote and the one or more identified up-sell or cross-sell opportunities.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the components are operable to:

determine whether approval is required for one or more portions of the generated bid package; and

if approval is required, obtain the required approval prior to communicating the bid package to the buyer.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the bid package further comprises one or more proposed contract terms.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the buyer and the seller are different departments within a single organization.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the buyer RFQ comprises one or more bills of materials (BOMs) each identifying a plurality of items.

17. A method for distributed quote management at a seller computer system, the method comprising:

receiving a buyer request for quote (RFQ) from at least one buyer, the buyer RFQ requesting a quote from the seller computer system and identifying a plurality of items;

automatically accessing a buyer profile for the at least one buyer;

automatically determining by a processor whether historical quote data is available for at least one of the plurality of items;

if historical quote data is available, automatically determine a best cost of each of the plurality of items in the buyer RFQ according to the historical quote data;

if historical quote data is not available, automatically determine a best cost of each of the plurality of items in the buyer RFQ according to one or more contracts between the seller and one or more suppliers;

using the determined best costs of the plurality of items in the buyer RFQ, automatically generating a quote for the buyer RFQ;

automatically generating a bid package for the buyer RFQ that comprises the generated quote; and

automatically communicating the generated bid package to the at least one buyer.

18. The method of claim 17 , comprising automatically matching a buyer part number identifying an item in the buyer RFQ with one or more seller part numbers.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the buyer RFQ comprises one or more approved supplier lists, the method further comprising automatically matching a buyer supplier identifier in an approved supplier list in the buyer RFQ with one or more seller supplier identifiers.

20. The method of claim 17 , comprising automatically determining a best cost of an item in the buyer RFQ according to one or more contracts between the buyer and one or more suppliers.

21. The method of claim 17 , comprising automatically determining a best cost of an item in the buyer REQ according to historical quote data associated with the item.

22. The method of claim 17 , comprising automatically determining a best cost of an item in the buyer RFQ according to one or more contracts between the seller and one or more suppliers.

23. The method of claim 17 , comprising:

determining whether an item in the buyer RFQ is available from an inventory of the seller;

accessing inventory price data for the item; and

determining a best cost of the item according to the accessed inventory price data for the item.

24. The method of claim 17 , comprising:

automatically generating one or more seller RFQs requesting a quote from one or more suppliers for an item in the buyer RFQ;

automatically communicating the one or more generated seller RFQs to one or more suppliers;

receiving one or more supplier responses to the one or more seller RFQs; and

automatically determining a best cost of the item according to the one or more received supplier responses to the one or more seller RFQs.

25. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

receiving one or more changes to the buyer RFQ from the at least one buyer after the bid package has been communicated to the at least one buyer;

generating a new bid package that incorporates the one or more changes into the bid package; and

communicating the new bid package to the at least one buyer.

26. The method of claim 17 , comprising:

automatically accessing a buyer profile for the buyer; and

according the accessed buyer profile, automatically determining whether to generate the bid package for the buyer RFQ.

27. The method of claim 17 , wherein the buyer profile comprises a profile selected from the group consisting of:

one or more win ratios of the seller with the buyer;

one or more sales volumes between the seller and the buyer; or

one or more margins on sales between the seller and the buyer.

28. The method of claim 17 , comprising:

automatically identifying one or more up-sell or cross-sell opportunities associated with the item; and

automatically generating a bid package for the buyer RFQ that comprises the generated quote and the one or more identified up-sell or cross-sell opportunities.

29. The method of claim 17 , comprising:

determining whether approval is required for one or more portions of the generated bid package; and

if approval is required, obtaining the required approval prior to communicating the bid package to the buyer.

30. The method of claim 17 , wherein the bid package further comprises one or more proposed contract terms.

31. The method of claim 17 , wherein the buyer and the seller are different departments within a single organization.

32. The system of claim 17 , wherein the buyer RFQ comprises one or more bills of materials (BOMs) each identifying a plurality of items.

33. A system for distributed quote management, the system comprising one or more components stored in a memory medium and collectively operable to:

receive a buyer request for quote (RFQ) from a buyer, the buyer RFQ requesting a quote from a seller and comprising one or more bills of materials (BOMs) each comprising a plurality of items that are each identified by a buyer part number;

determine whether there are one or more contracts between the buyer and one or more suppliers affecting best costs of one or more first items in the buyer RFQ available to the seller from the one or more suppliers;

if there are one or more contracts between the buyer and one or more suppliers affecting best costs of one or more first items in the buyer RFQ available to the seller from the one or more suppliers, access the one or more contracts between the buyer and the one or more suppliers and determine the best cost of each first item according to the one or more contracts between the buyer and the one or more suppliers;

determine whether historical quote data associated with one or more second items in the buyer RFQ is available;

if historical quote data associated with one or more second items in the buyer RFQ is available, access the historical quote data and determine the best cost of each second item according to the historical quote data;

determine whether there are one or more contracts between the seller and one or more suppliers affecting best costs of one or more fourth items available to the seller from the one or more suppliers, the one or more fourth items each comprising a third item;

if there are one or more contracts between the seller and one or more suppliers affecting best costs of one or more fourth items in the buyer RFQ available to the seller from the one or more suppliers, access the one or more contracts between the seller and one or more suppliers and determine the best costs of the one or more fourth items according to the one or more contracts between the seller and the one or more suppliers;

generate one or more seller RFQs requesting a quote for one or more fifth items from one or more suppliers, communicate the one or more seller RFQs to the one or more suppliers, receive one or more supplier responses to the seller RFQs, and determine best costs of the one or more fifth items according to the supplier responses to the seller RFQs, the one or more fifth items each comprising a third item;

using the determined best costs of the plurality of items in the buyer RFQ, generate a quote for the buyer RFQ;

generate a bid package for the buyer RFQ that comprises the generated quote for the buyer RFQ; and

communicate the generated bid package to the buyer.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053383/0117) Recorded Nov 3, 2021
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 058794/0776 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 16, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.; BLUE YONDER, INC.; JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC.; I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC; MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC.; MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC.; REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC; JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC.; REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION; BY BOND FINANCE, INC.; BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC.; BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 057724/0593 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REEL 026468 FRAME NUMBER FROM 0199 TO 0119 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 055136 FRAME 0623. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 19, 2021
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 056813/0110 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 026740 FRAME: 0676. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 8, 2021
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 055257/0747 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026468 FRAME 0199. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME FROM I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. TO JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.. Recorded Dec 12, 2020
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 055136/0623 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 3, 2020
From: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053383/0117 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 14, 2020
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 052392/0604 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: RP CROWN PARENT, LLC; RP CROWN HOLDING LLC; JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040326/0449 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0809 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0356 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0697 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0053 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0697 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0809 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Recorded Dec 21, 2012
From: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 029529/0812 →