IP Library Granted Patent US 6,838,847
Granted Patent B2
US 6,838,847 · App. 10/157,378 · Granted Jan 4, 2005

Stall protection based on back EMF detection

Assignee: Siemens VDO Automotive Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,838,847
App. No.
10/157,378
Granted
Jan 4, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of detecting a rotor condition of a dc motor is provided. The motor 14 is part of a motor control circuit 10 having a free-wheeling diode 20 in parallel with the motor 14 . The method establishes a threshold voltage for back emf voltage evaluation. The motor is energized to operate at a certain speed. Current is cut-off to the motor via a switch 16 for a time sufficient for current through the free-wheeling diode to decay to zero. The back emf voltage detected at leads of the motor is then compared via a comparator 21 to the threshold voltage.

Claims (70)

1. Method of detecting a rotor condition of a dc motor, the motor being part of a motor control circuit, the motor control circuit having a free-wheeling diode in parallel with the motor, the method including:

establishing a threshold voltage for back emf evaluation by providing at least one diode connected in series with a positive motor terminal,

energizing the motor to operate at a certain speed,

cutting-off current to the motor for a time sufficient for current through the free-wheeling diode to decay to zero, and

comparing the back emf voltage detected at leads of the motor to the threshold voltage.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of cutting-off current to the motor includes controlling a switch to be turned-off preventing current to the motor.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein switch is a FET controlled by a pulse width modulated signal, and the method includes controlling the FET to cut-off current to the motor.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the sufficient time does not exceed one pulse duration.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of comparing the back emf includes using an open collector comparator and, the following formulas being used in the back emf voltage and threshold voltage comparison:

( In +)=[( M +)−2 *Vf]*k

( In −)=( M −)* k

( In +)−( In −)=[( M +)−( M −)−2 *Vf]*k

where:

In+ is the non-inverting input of the comparator

In− is the inverting input of the comparator

M+ is the positive terminal of the motor

M− is the negative terminal of the motor

Vf is the forward voltage across the at least one diode

k is a resistor divider ratio of values of resistors in series with the comparator,

wherein a stall condition is indicated when In−(M−) is greater than In+(M+) and the motor is considered to be running properly when In+(M+) is greater than In−(M−).

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the energizing step includes operating the motor in a DC control mode, and the cutting-off step includes controlling a switch to be off only when a stall condition of the motor is to be determined.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of establishing a threshold voltage includes establishing a fixed threshold voltage.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of defining a threshold voltage includes establishing a threshold voltage proportional to an expected speed of the motor.

9. A motor control circuit for detecting a condition of a rotor of a motor of the circuit, the circuit comprising:

a dc motor having a rotor,

a free-wheeling diode in parallel with the motor,

diode means for establishing a threshold voltage for back emf evaluation, the diode means including at least one diode connected in series with a positive motor terminal,

means for energizing the motor to operate at a certain speed,

means for cutting-off current to the motor for a time sufficient for current through the free-wheeling diode to decay to zero, and

means for comparing the back emf voltage at leads of the motor to the threshold voltage.

10. The circuit of claim 9 , wherein the means for cutting-off current to the motor is a switch.

11. The circuit of claim 10 , wherein switch is a FET controlled by a pulse width modulated signal.

12. The circuit of claim 11 , wherein the sufficient time does not exceed one pulse duration.

13. The circuit of claim 9 , wherein the means for comparing includes an open collector comparator, the following formulas being employed in the back emf voltage and threshold voltage comparison:

( In +)=[( M +)−2 *Vf]*k

( In −)=( M −)* k

( In +)−( In −)=[( M +)−( M −)−2 *Vf]*k

where:

In+ is the non-inverting input of the comparator

In− is the inverting input of the comparator

M+ is the positive terminal of the motor

M− is the negative terminal of the motor

Vf is the forward voltage across the free-wheeling diode

k is a resistor divider ratio of values of resistors in series with the comparator,

wherein a stall condition is indicated when In−(M−) is greater than In+(M+) and the motor is considered to be running properly when In+(M+) is greater than In−(M−).

14. A motor control circuit for detecting a condition for a rotor of a dc motor, the motor control circuit comprising:

a dc motor having a rotor,

a power supply supplying power to the motor,

a free-wheeling diode in parallel with the motor,

a switch for cutting-off current to the motor,

at least one diode, connected in series with a positive terminal of the motor for establishing a voltage threshold,

an open collector comparator,

a voltage tap for detecting voltage across leads of the motor, and

a controller constructed and arranged to control operation of the switch such that when the switch is turned off, cutting-off current to the motor, back emf voltage can be measured via the voltage tap and can be compared via the comparator to the threshold voltage.

15. The circuit of claim 14 , wherein the switch is a FET.

16. The circuit of claim 14 , wherein the switch is a relay.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of comparing the back emf includes using an open collector comparator.

18. The circuit of claim 9 , wherein the means for comparing the back emf is an open collector comparator.

19. The circuit of claim 14 , wherein the comparator employs the following formulas in the back emf voltage and threshold voltage comparison:

( In +)=[( M +)−2 *Vf]*k

( In −)=( M −)* k

( In +)−( In −)=[( M +)−( M −)−2 *Vf]*k

where:

In+ is the non-inverting input of the comparator

In− is the inverting input of the comparator

M+ is the positive terminal of the motor

M− is the negative terminal of the motor

Vf is the forward voltage across the free-wheeling diode

k is a resistor divider ratio of values of resistors in series with the comparator,

wherein a stall condition is indicated when In−(M−) is greater than In+(M+) and the motor is considered to be running properly when In+(M+) is greater than In−(M−).

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2011
From: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE CANADA INC.
To: BROSE FAHRZEUGTEILE GMBH & CO. KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT, WURZBURG
Reel/Frame 027356/0497 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 16, 2011
From: SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CANADA INC.
To: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE CANADA, INC.
Reel/Frame 026460/0246 →
MERGER Recorded Jun 16, 2011
From: SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE INC.
To: SIEMENS CANADA LIMITED
Reel/Frame 026461/0258 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 16, 2011
From: SIEMENS CANADA LIMITED
To: SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CANADA INC.
Reel/Frame 026464/0870 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 9, 2002
From: DRAGOI, CORNELIU; VANWYCK, RODNEY
To: SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE INC.
Reel/Frame 013311/0403 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 6037931800 · May 9, 2002
Related Publication 20030210011A1 · Nov 13, 2003