IP Library Granted Patent US 7,050,825
Granted Patent B2
US 7,050,825 · App. 10/205,577 · Granted May 23, 2006

Method for power reduction in inter-symbol interference limited channels

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,050,825
App. No.
10/205,577
Granted
May 23, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method of reducing transmission power across a loop in a discrete multitone communication system. A first signal to noise ratio (SNR) is estimated for a signal transmitted across the loop. A second SNR is estimated for a signal across the loop, the second SNR signal being estimated exclusive of a predetermined portion of the first SNR. A power cutback scaling factor is determined in accordance with the first SNR, the second SNR, and a predefined maximum SNR degradation amount. The transmission power is scaled in accordance with said scaling factor for reducing said transmission power. In such a manner, fine gains are computed such that the transmit power is reduced without significantly affecting the achieved data rate.

Claims (46)

1. A method for reducing transmission power across a loop in a discrete multitone communication system comprising the steps of:

a) estimating a first signal to noise ratio (SNR) for a signal transmitted across said loop;

b) estimating a second SNR for a signal across said loop, said second SNR signal being estimated exclusive of a predetermined portion of said first SNR;

c) determining a power cutback scaling factor in accordance with said first SNR, said second SNR, and a predefined maximum SNR degradation amount; and

d) scaling said transmission power in accordance with said power cutback scaling factor for reducing said transmission power.

2. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said predetermined portion of said first SNR includes intersymbol interference and interchannel interference.

3. A method as defined in claim 2 , wherein said first SNR is estimated during a MEDLEY state and said second SNR is estimated during a REVERB state.

4. A method as defined in claim 3 , wherein a signal frequency of said REVERB state is shaped such that a power spectral density of said signal frequency resembles a power spectral density of a signal frequency of said MEDLEY state.

5. A method as defined in claim 2 , wherein said second SNR is estimated prior to a channel analysis phase of an initialization procedure.

6. A method as defined in claim 2 , wherein said second SNR is calculated in accordance with an estimated frequency response of said signal and an estimated noise power.

7. A method as defined in claim 6 , wherein said estimated frequency response of a signal and said estimated noise power are estimated at a per bin level.

8. A method as defined in claim 7 , wherein said estimated frequency response is estimated during a REVERB state.

9. A method as defined in claim 7 , wherein said estimated frequency noise power is estimated during an ECT state.

10. A method as defined in claim 7 , wherein said estimated frequency response is estimated during a transceiver training phase of an initialization procedure.

11. A method as defined in claim 2 , wherein said second SNR is estimated by estimating a SNR on a plurality of continuous tones sent across said loop, said continuous tones not being modulated between discrete multitone signals.

12. A method as defined in claim 11 , wherein said plurality of continuous tones represents a portion of possible tones and said SNR for remaining tones are interpolated.

13. A method as defined in claim 2 , wherein said scaling factor is determined in accordance with the equation

A

=

1

/

Δ

SNR

SNR

deg

-

1

+

1

/

Δ

SNR

,

where SNR deg is said predefined maximum SNR degradation amount and ΔSNR is a ratio of said second SNR and said first SNR.

14. A method as defined in claim 2 , wherein said transmission power is scaled only when a difference between said first SNR and said second SNR is less than a predefined threshold.

15. A method as defined in claim 14 , wherein said predefined threshold is a sum of errors accumulated in estimating said first SNR and said second SNR.

16. A method for reducing transmission power across a loop in a discrete multitone communication system comprising the steps of:

a) estimating a channel capacity in accordance with a full power signal;

b) estimating a plurality of scaled channel capacities in accordance with corresponding ones of a plurality of scaled power signals, said scaled power signals being scaled in accordance with a scaling factor;

c) selecting a power cutback scaling factor in accordance with a lowest one of said scaling factors that results in an estimated scaled channel capacity that differs less than a predefined amount from said estimated channel capacity; and

d) scaling said transmission power in accordance with said selected power cutback scaling factor for reducing said transmission power.

17. A method as defined in claim 16 , wherein said method is only used when narrowband noise is detected in said communication system.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 065630/0232 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2019
From: CIENA CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 050969/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 30, 2019
From: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 050938/0389 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 16, 2014
From: CIENA CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 033347/0260 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2014
From: CIENA CORPORATION
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
Reel/Frame 033329/0417 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 15, 2005
From: CATENA NETWORKS, INC.
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015904/0969 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT AN ERROR ASSIGNOR SCOTT MCCLENNON'S SIGNED ASSIGNMENT PERTAINED TO ANOTHER APPLICATION BY BOTH INVENTORS, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 013440, FRAME 0618. Recorded May 16, 2003
From: GINESI, ALBERTO; MCCLENNON, SCOTT
To: CATENA NETWORKS INC.
Reel/Frame 014075/0035 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2003
From: GINESI, ALBERTO; MCCLENON, SCOTT
To: CATENA NETWORKS CANADA INC.
Reel/Frame 013979/0955 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2003
From: CATENA NETWORKS CANADA, INC.
To: CATENA NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 013979/0949 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2002
From: GINESI, ALBERTO; MCCLENNON, SCOTT
To: CATENA NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 013440/0618 →