IP Library Granted Patent US 7,395,158
Granted Patent B2
US 7,395,158 · App. 10/219,200 · Granted Jul 1, 2008

Method of screening for disorders of glucose metabolism

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,395,158
App. No.
10/219,200
Granted
Jul 1, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of screening for disorders of glucose metabolism such as impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes allows prevention, or early detection and treatment of diabetic complications such as cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, and other disorders of the major organs and systems. A mathematical algorithm evaluates the shape of a subject's glucose profile and classifies the profile into one of several predefined clusters, each cluster corresponding either to a normal condition or one of several abnormal conditions. The series of blood glucose values making up the glucose tolerance curve may be measured using any glucose analyzer including: invasive, minimally invasive and noninvasive types. The method is executed on a processing device programmed to perform the steps of the method. Depending on the outcome of the screening, a subject may be provided with additional information concerning their condition and/or counseled to consult further with their health care provider.

Claims (186)

1. A method of screening a subject for disorders of glucose metabolism, comprising the steps of:

obtaining at least a portion of a glucose concentration profile for the subject using:

a noninvasive blood glucose concentration analyzer, said profile comprising a plurality of blood glucose values after ingestion of food and said profile being obtained within five hours of said ingestion of food;

evaluating shape of said profile using one or more parameters of said shape; and

classifying said subject into at least one predetermined cluster using evaluation of said shape,

wherein said cluster comprises at least one of

diabetes;

impaired glucose tolerance;

normal physiological response; and

low glucose tolerance;

wherein classifying said subject provides information concerning said subject's condition to said subject and/or a practitioner.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said plurality of blood glucose values comprises a time series.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said blood glucose values are actual values.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said blood glucose values are relative values.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said parameters include any of:

initial fasting glucose concentration; and

glucose concentration after elapse of a predetermined time interval.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein said evaluating step comprises:

comparing any of said parameters with predetermined values and/or ranges of values for each parameter indicative of either a normal condition or one of a plurality of abnormal conditions.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein each of said at least one predetermined clusters corresponds to one of said normal and abnormal conditions, said normal and abnormal conditions comprising:

normal;

impaired glucose tolerance;

diabetic; and

low glucose tolerance.

8. A method of screening a subject for disorders of glucose metabolism, comprising the steps of:

obtaining at least a portion of a glucose concentration profile using any of:

a noninvasive blood glucose concentration analyzer;

a minimally invasive blood glucose concentration analyzer; and

an invasive blood glucose concentration analyzer,

said profile comprising a plurality of blood glucose values after ingestion of food and said profile being obtained within five hours of said ingestion of food;

evaluating shape of said profile using one or more parameters of said shape; and

classifying said subject into at least one predetermined cluster using evaluation of said shape;

wherein classifying said subject provides information concerning said subject's condition to said subject and/or a practitioner,

wherein said evaluation step comprises: determining a weight for each of said parameters using a fuzzy algorithm.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein said step of determining a weight comprises the step of:

assigning each parameter a value on either a linear or non-linear scale, wherein said assigned value comprises said weight.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein minimum and maximum of said scale correspond to predetermined threshold values for a normal condition and a diabetic condition, respectively.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein minimum and maximum of said scale correspond to predetermined threshold values for a low glucose tolerance and a normal condition, respectively.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein minimum and maximum of said scale correspond to predetermined threshold values for a low glucose tolerance and a diabetic condition, respectively.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein ranges of values represented by said scale are established according to standard diagnostic criteria.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein missing parameters are assigned a weight of zero.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein missing data are supplied from historical data.

16. The method of claim 9 , further comprising the step of calculating one or more screening factors based on actual or relative values of said parameters and said weights.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein said step of calculating screening factors comprises the step of calculating a weighted average of said weighted parameters according to:

SF

=

(

P

1

W

1

+

P

2

W

2

+

P

3

W

3

+

P

4

W

4

+

P

5

W

5

+

P

6

W

6

)

(

W

1

+

W

2

+

W

3

+

W

4

+

W

5

+

W

6

)

wherein SF=said screening factor and P 1 =a first parameter, said first parameter comprising glucose concentration, P 2 =a second parameter, said second parameter comprising rate at which glucose concentration rises, P 3 =a third parameter, said third parameter comprising maximum monitored glucose concentration; P 4 =a fourth parameter, said fourth parameter comprising duration that glucose remains elevated; P 5 =a fifth parameter, said fifth parameter comprising rate of decrease of glucose concentration after a peak; and P 6 =a sixth parameter, said sixth parameter comprising minimum glucose concentration after a maximum; and

wherein W 1 =a weighting factor.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein said step of calculating screening factors comprises the steps of:

calculating a weighted average of a first set of selected weighted parameters using the equation:

SF

1

=

(

P

1

W

1

+

P

6

W

6

)

(

W

1

+

W

6

)

wherein SF 1 =a first screening factor; and

calculating a weighted average of a second set of selected weighted parameters using the equation:

SF

2

=

(

P

2

W

2

+

P

3

W

3

+

P

4

W

4

+

P

5

W

5

)

(

W

2

+

W

3

+

W

4

+

W

5

)

wherein SF 2 =a second screening factor, and P 1 =a first parameter, said first parameter comprising glucose concentration; P 2 =a second parameter, said second parameter comprising rate at which glucose concentration rises; P 3 =a third parameter, said third parameter comprising maximum monitored glucose concentration; P 4 =a fourth parameter, said fourth parameter comprising duration that glucose remains elevated; P 5 =a fifth parameter, said fifth parameter comprising rate of decrease of glucose concentration after a peak; and P 6 =a sixth parameter, said sixth parameter comprising minimum glucose concentration after a maximum; and

wherein W 1 =a weighting factor.

19. The method of claim 16 , further comprising the step of establishing threshold screening limits using said screening factors.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein said parameters include any of:

initial fasting glucose concentration;

rate of increase of glucose concentration following said glucose challenge;

peak monitored glucose concentration;

duration glucose remains elevated;

rate of decrease of glucose concentration following said peak concentration; and

minimum glucose concentration following said peak concentration.

21. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of advising said subject of screening results.

22. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of advising said subject of health risks from complications resulting from subject's condition.

23. The method of claim 1 , wherein a processing device so programmed executes said steps.

24. The method of claim 1 , wherein said food comprises any of a glucose beverage and a carbohydrate-rich food.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 6, 2012
From: SENSYS MEDICAL, LIMITED
To: GLT ACQUISITION CORP.
Reel/Frame 028912/0036 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2012
From: SENSYS MEDICAL, INC.
To: SENSYS MEDICAL, LTD
Reel/Frame 028714/0623 →
LIEN RELEASE Recorded Apr 14, 2009
From: GLENN PATENT GROUP
To: SENSYS MEDICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 022542/0360 →
LIEN Recorded Jan 20, 2009
From: SENSYS MEDICAL, INC.
To: GLENN PATENT GROUP
Reel/Frame 022117/0887 →