IP Library Granted Patent US 6,865,589
Granted Patent B2
US 6,865,589 · App. 10/291,009 · Granted Mar 8, 2005

Watermark detection

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,865,589
App. No.
10/291,009
Granted
Mar 8, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

An improved method and arrangement for detecting a watermark in an information (e.g. image or video) signal are disclosed. The detection is more reliable and less vulnerable to image processing by partitioning the image into a sequence of blocks having a predetermined size, accumulating the blocks, computing a value indicative of the correlation of the accumulated blocks and the watermark having the predetermined size, and detecting whether the correlation value is larger than a predetermined threshold.

Claims (24)

1. A method of detecting a watermark in an image, comprising the acts of:

partitioning the image into a sequence of blocks having a predetermined size;

accumulating said blocks;

computing a value indicative of the correlation of said accumulated blocks and said watermark having said predetermined size; and

detecting whether said correlation value is larger than a predetermined threshold.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

said computing act comprises the steps of Fourier transforming the image and said watermark into respective Fourier coefficients, multiplying corresponding coefficients to obtain Fourier coefficients representing correlation values each corresponding with one of a plurality of positions of the watermark with respect to the image, and inverse transforming the fourier coefficients representing the correlation values; and

said act of detecting comprises detecting whether at least one of said correlation values is larger than the predetermined threshold.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 , further including an act of normalizing the Fourier coefficients representing the correlation values to substantially the same magnitudes.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said act of normalizing is applied to the Fourier coefficients representing the information signal.

5. A method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said act of normalizing is further applied to the Fourier coefficients representing the watermark.

6. A method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said act of normalizing includes dividing each Fourier coefficient by its respective magnitude.

7. A method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said act of normalizing includes dividing each Fourier coefficient by its real or imaginary part depending on which is the largest.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein said dividing comprises dividing by a power of 2.

9. An arrangement for detecting a watermark in an image, comprising:

partitioning means for partitioning the image into a sequence of blocks having a predetermined size;

accumulation means for accumulating said blocks;

correlation computing means for computing avalue indicative of the correlation of said accumulated blocks and said watermark having said predetermined size; and

a detector for detecting whether said correlation value is larger than a predetermined threshold.

10. A device for recording and/or reproducing an image signal, comprising means for disabling recording and/or reproduction of the image signal in dependence upon the presence of a watermark in the image signal, characterized in that the device comprises an arrangement for detecting said watermark in the image signal comprising:

partitioning means for partitioning the image signal into a sequence of blocks having a predetermined size;

accumulation means for accumulating said blocks;

correlation computing means for computing a value indicative of the correlation of said accumulated blocks and said watermark having said predetermined size; and

a detector for detecting whether said correlation value is large than a predetermined threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2009
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
To: CIVOLUTION B.V.
Reel/Frame 022757/0455 →