IP Library Granted Patent US 8,018,903
Granted Patent B2
US 8,018,903 · App. 10/301,115 · Granted Sep 13, 2011

Closed-loop transmit diversity scheme in frequency selective multipath channels

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,018,903
App. No.
10/301,115
Granted
Sep 13, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

Closed loop multiple-antenna wireless communications system with antenna weights determined by maximizing a composite channel signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio minimum. Multiplexed symbol streams over subsets of antennas enhance throughput.

Claims (51)

1. A method of transmission, comprising:

(a) providing P transmit antennas where P is an integer greater than or equal to 2;

(b) providing weights for said P antennas, said weights determined from information of communication channels from said P antennas to Q receive antennas) where Q is a positive integer, said weights determined to suppress multipath interference at a remote receiver having said Q receive antenna(s); and

(c) transmitting symbols modified by said weights from said P antennas.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined in step (b) of claim 1 includes off-diagonal minimization of elements of a channel matrix premultiplied by its Hermitian conjugate.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined in step (b) of claim 1 includes information of a detection method to account for said multipath interference.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined in step (b) of claim 1 includes minimization of an error rate when using said detection method.

5. The method of, claim 4 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined includes minimization of symbol error rate for a maximum likelihood detection method.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined in step (b) of claim 1 includes maximization of a signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio when using said detection method.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined in step (b) includes maximization of minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio for a detection method selected from the group consisting of linear zero-forcing, linear minimum mean square error, iterative zero-forcing, and iterative minimum mean square error.

8. The method of claim 3 , wherein:

(a) said providing weights in step (b) includes channel information estimated from reception of signals from said Q antenna(s).

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

(a) said providing weights in step (b) of claim 1 includes reception of channel information from said Q antenna(s).

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

(a) said providing weights in step (b) of claim 1 includes reception of said weights from said Q antenna(s).

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

(a) said communication channel is a wideband or CDMA channel with a single user using multiple codes having the same weights.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined in step (b) includes information of a detection method to account for said multipath interference; wherein said detection method is multicode interference cancellation with method selected from the group consisting of linear zero-forcing, linear minimum mean square error, iterative zero-forcing, and iterative minimum mean square error.

13. The method of claim 3 , wherein:

(a) said communication channel is a wideband or CDMA channel with multiple users having differing weights; and

(b) said differing weights are from claim 3 by joint maximization.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein:

(a) said weights determined in step (b) includes information of a detection method to account for said multipath interference; wherein said detection method is multiuser interference cancellation with method selected from the group consisting of linear zero-forcing, linear minimum mean square error, iterative zero-forcing, and iterative minimum mean, square error.

15. The method of claim 3 , wherein:

(a) said weights of step (b) of claim 1 are updated.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

(a) said integer Q is greater than or equal to said integer P.

17. A transmitter, comprising:

(a) P transmit antennas where P is an integer greater than or equal to 2; and

(b) multipliers with weights coupled to said P antennas, said weights determined from (i) information of communication channels from said P antennas to Q receive antenna(s) where Q is a positive integer, said weights determined to suppress multipath interference at a remote receiver having said Q receive antenna(s) and/or (ii) a detection method to suppress multipath interference at said remote receiver.

18. The transmitter of claim 17 , wherein:

(a) said weights are determined by a processor coupled to said multipliers.

19. The transmitter of claim 17 , wherein:

(a) said weights are determined outside of said transmitter and received by said transmitter from said signals from said Q antenna(s).

20. A receiver, comprising:

(a) Q antenna(s) where Q is a positive integer;

(b) a detector coupled to said Q antenna(s), said detector adapted to detect signals from P transmit antennas where P is an integer greater than or equal to 2 and with weights applied to said P antennas, where said weights are determined from (i) information of, communication channels from said P antennas to said Q receive antenna(s), said weights determined to suppress multipath interference at said receiver and/or (ii) a detection method of said detector to suppress multipath interference at said receiver.

21. The receiver of claim 20 , wherein:

(a) said detection method is selected from the group consisting of linear zero-forcing, linear minimum mean square error, iterative zero-forcing, and iterative minimum mean square error; and

(b) said weights determination includes maximization, of minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio.

22. The receiver of claim 20 , wherein:

(a) said detection method is maximum likelihood; and

(b) said weights determination includes minimization of symbol error rate.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 19, 2017
From: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
To: INTEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041383/0040 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 1, 2003
From: ONGGOSANUSI, EKO N.; DABAK, ANAND G.
To: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 013917/0806 →