IP Library Granted Patent US 6,989,903
Granted Patent B2
US 6,989,903 · App. 10/333,941 · Granted Jan 24, 2006

Polarization diversity detector mask selection algorithm

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,989,903
App. No.
10/333,941
Granted
Jan 24, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for selecting a cell from each member of a tri-cell photodetector array used to detect optical signals output from a multichannel sensor array to indicate interference between two optical signals of unknown polarization incident upon the tri-cell photodetector array comprises selecting a cell in each tri-cell photodetector and collecting a selected number of samples of the signal output for each cell. Each sample has an in-phase AC component I and a quadrature AC component Q. An amplitude sum signal E=I*I+Q*Q is calculated for a predetermined number of samples in the selected number of samples of the signal output for each cell. The signal output of cell in each tri-cell photodetector having the largest value of the amplitude sum signal is selected for further processing.

Claims (52)

1. A method for selecting a cell from photodetector array used to detect optical signals output from a plurality of sensors arranged to indicate interference between two optical signals of unknown polarization incident upon the photodetector array, comprising the steps of:

(a) selecting a cell for testing;

(b) collecting a selected number of samples of the signal output for each selected cell, each sample having an in-phase component having magnitude I and a quadrature component having magnitude Q;

(c) calculating an amplitude sum value E=I*I+Q*Q for a predetermined number of samples in the selected number of samples of the signal output for each selected cell;

(d) repeating steps (a)–(c) for each cell selected for testing; and

(e) selecting the cell having the largest amplitude sum value.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of testing the largest amplitude sum value to determine whether it is suitable for demodulation.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising the steps of:

arranging the plurality of sensors to be in a plurality of channels with each channel having a corresponding gain that controls the amplitude sum values;

comparing the largest amplitude sum value to a reference amplitude A ref ; and

maintaining the gain in the channel containing the cell having the largest amplitude sum value if the largest amplitude sum value is not less than the reference amplitude.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising the steps of:

determining whether the largest amplitude sum value is less than the reference amplitude;

comparing the largest amplitude sum to a selected minimum amplitude value A min if the largest amplitude sum is less than the reference amplitude;

calculating a gain correction

G

=

A

ref

-

E

A

ref

if the largest amplitude sum is less than the selected minimum amplitude.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising the step of nulling the gain in the channel containing the cell having largest amplitude sum if the largest amplitude sum is less than the selected minimum amplitude.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising the step of:

testing all cells in the photodetector array; and

selecting for each photodetector the cell having the largest amplitude sum value.

7. A method for selecting a cell from members of a multicell photodetector array used to detect optical signals output from an array of sensors arranged in a plurality of channels to indicate interference between two optical signals of unknown polarization incident upon the photodetector array, comprising the steps of:

(a) selecting a cell in of the tri-cell photodetectors;

(b) collecting a selected number of samples of the signal output for each selected cell, each sample having an in-phase component having magnitude I and a quadrature component having magnitude Q;

(c) calculating an amplitude sum for a predetermined number of samples in the selected number of samples of the signal output for each selected cell;

(d) repeating steps (a)–(c) for each cell selected for testing;

(e) selecting the cell in each multicell photodetector having the largest amplitude sum value.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising the step of testing the amplitude sum having the largest value to determine whether it is suitable for demodulation.

9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising the steps of:

comparing the amplitude sum having the largest value to a reference amplitude A ref ; and

maintaining the gain in the channel containing the cell having largest amplitude sum if the largest amplitude sum is not less than the reference amplitude.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising the steps of:

determining whether the largest amplitude sum value is less than the reference amplitude;

comparing the largest amplitude sum to a selected minimum amplitude value A min if the largest amplitude sum is less than the reference amplitude;

calculating a gain correction

G

=

A

ref

-

E

A

ref

if the largest amplitude sum is less than the selected minimum amplitude.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising the step of nulling the gain in the channel containing the cell having largest amplitude sum if the largest amplitude sum is less than the selected minimum amplitude.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 7, 2011
From: NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
To: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 025597/0505 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2006
From: NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
To: LITTON SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 018148/0388 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2004
From: GIBBONS, GREGORY ALAN
To: NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 014383/0630 →