IP Library Granted Patent US 7,433,849
Granted Patent B2
US 7,433,849 · App. 10/341,124 · Granted Oct 7, 2008

System and method for controlling a postage metering system using data required for printing

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,433,849
App. No.
10/341,124
Granted
Oct 7, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling a postage metering system includes a mailer defining a first set of parameters for which the generation of postage evidence is authorized to be dispensed from the mailer's meter account. When a request for postage evidence is received, the request includes a second set of postage parameters. The requested postage evidence is generated only when each of the postage parameters in the second set matches one of the parameters in the first set. Alternatively, the first set of parameters defines parameters for which the generation of postage evidence is not authorized to be dispensed from the mailer's account, and the requested postage evidence will be generated only when none of the postage parameters in the second set matches one of the parameters in the first set.

Claims (26)

1. A method for a postage metering system including a data center and a remote computer to generate postage evidence, the data center maintaining a meter account for a mailer, the method comprising:

receiving from the mailer a first set of rating parameters for which postage evidence is authorized by the mailer to be dispensed from the mailer's meter account, the first set of rating parameters including at least one of a weight classification, a mail classification, and an oversize indicator;

storing the first set of rating parameters at the data center;

receiving at the data center a request for the postage evidence from the remote computer, the request including a second set of rating parameters associated with a mail piece;

determining at the data center if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters stored at the data center;

generating at the data center the postage evidence utilizing a processor and cryptographic keys stored at the data center if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters; and

inhibiting generation of the postage evidence by the processor if one or more parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece does not match at least one parameter included in the first set of rating parameters.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mailer includes a plurality of users and each user has an associated first set of rating parameters provided by the mailer, the request further including an identification of a specific user, and determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters further comprises:

determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters associated with the specific user.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein each day of the week has an associated first set of rating parameters, and determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters further comprises:

determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters associated with the day of the week on which the request for postage evidence was received.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of rating parameters further includes a destination postal code.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of rating parameters further includes an origin postal code.

6. A method for a postage metering system including a data center and a remote computer to generate postage evidence, the data center maintaining a meter account for a mailer, the method comprising:

receiving from the mailer a first set of rating parameters for which postage evidence is not authorized to be dispensed from the mailer's meter account, the first set of rating parameters including at least one of a weight classification, a mail classification, and an oversize indicator;

storing the first set of rating parameters at the data center;

receiving at the data center a request for the postage evidence from the remote computer, the request including a second set of rating parameters associated with a mail piece;

determining at the data center if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters stored at the data center;

generating at the data center the postage evidence utilizing a processor and cryptographic keys stored at the data center if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece does not match one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters; and

inhibiting generation of the postage evidence by the processor if at least one parameter included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the mailer includes a plurality of users and each user has an associated first set of rating parameters provided by the mailer, the request further including an identification of a specific user, and determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters further comprises:

determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters associated with the specific user.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein each day of the week has an associated first set of rating parameters, and determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters associated with the mail piece matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters fUrther comprises:

determining if each of the parameters included in the second set of rating parameters matches one of the parameters included in the first set of rating parameters associated with the day of the week on which the request for postage evidence was received.

9. The method of claim 6 , wherein the first set of rating parameters further includes a destination postal code.

10. The method of claim 6 , wherein the first set of rating parameters further includes an origin postal code.

Assignments (2)
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 19, 2025
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: PITNEY BOWES, INC.
Reel/Frame 070256/0396 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2019
From: PITNEY BOWES INC.; NEWGISTICS, INC.; BORDERFREE, INC.; TACIT KNOWLEDGE, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 050905/0640 →