IP Library Granted Patent US 7,701,860
Granted Patent B2
US 7,701,860 · App. 10/369,539 · Granted Apr 20, 2010

Control plane stability in communications networks

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,701,860
App. No.
10/369,539
Granted
Apr 20, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for establishing a test connection to verify the ability to automatically re-establish control plane connections, if necessary, in a PNNI network. Certain routing features such as restricted transit feature and policy based routing features or the current stat of the network itself can limit access to nodes and links between nodes. If these features are implemented in a network or the network state changes after a control plane connection has been established, then these changed conditions will not affect the current connection but may prevent the re-establishment of the connection if it is unintentionally dropped. According to the invention a test connection is periodically set-up through the network and if the test connection fails an alarm or other notice is given. This allows for preventative action to be taken in order to avoid disruption to the network.

Claims (28)

1. A method of monitoring effects of a provisioning change to node policies among given policy types in a data communications network or to a communication link between two nodes, comprising

a) identifying an existing communication connection between two pair group leader (PGL) nodes in the network, said identifying including identifying the policy type of said communication connection;

b) determining nodes and links over which the existing communication connection is routed;

c) attempting to create a test connection between the two PGL nodes of the same type as said communication connection and over any available nodes and links in the network;

d) responsive to failure of the attempt, reporting to the network operator an indication of a result of the attempt.

2. The network of claim 1 wherein the data communications network is an ATM network.

3. The method of claim 2 further comprising repeating the steps a) to d) at a predetermined periodic interval.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the step a) comprises identifying a PNNI routing control channel (RCC) connection.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the step a) further comprises identifying a switched virtual connection (SVCC) type PNNI RCC connection.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein the step a) comprises identifying a PNNI routing control channel (RCC) connection.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the step a) further comprises identifying a switched virtual channel connection (SVCC) type PNNI RCC connection.

8. The method of claim 2 wherein the step d) comprises raising an alarm.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the step d) further comprises determining an alternate route for the connection and reporting existence of the alternate route.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein the method further comprises the step of determining an alternate route for the connection and reporting existence of the alternate route.

11. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step e) of repeating the steps a) to d) at a predetermined periodic interval.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the step a) comprises identifying a PNNI routing control channel (RCC) connection.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the step a) further comprises identifying a switched virtual channel connection (SVCC) type PNNI RCC connection.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the step a) comprises identifying a PNNI routing control channel (RCC) connection.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein the step a) further comprises identifying a switched virtual connection (SVCC) type PNNI RCC connection.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the step d) comprises raising an alarm.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the step d) further comprises determining an alternate route for the connection and reporting existence of the alternate route.

18. An apparatus for monitoring effects of a provisioning change to node policies among given policy types in a data communications network, comprising:

a) means for identifying a connection (PGL) nodes used for control communications in the network, said identifying including identifying the policy type of said connection;

b) means for determining nodes and links over which the connection is routed;

c) means for attempting to create a test connection between the two PGL nodes of the same type as said identified existing communication connection and over any available nodes and links in the network;

d) means responsive to failure of the attempt for reporting to the network operator an indication of a result of the attempt.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the reporting performed by said means for reporting includes an alarm.

20. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the means for reporting has means to determine an alternate Previously Presented route for the connection and reporting the existence of the alternate route.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 033868/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 30, 2013
From: ALCATEL LUCENT
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 029821/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 16, 2010
From: ALCATEL
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 023938/0701 →