IP Library Granted Patent US 7,660,741
Granted Patent B2
US 7,660,741 · App. 10/378,802 · Granted Feb 9, 2010

Sourcing under quantity pricing rules

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,660,741
App. No.
10/378,802
Granted
Feb 9, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for sourcing an item requirement includes receiving an item requirement that identifies an item and a quantity of the item that needs to be sourced from one or more suppliers. The method also includes determining one or more sourcing criteria that affect the sourcing of the item. The sourcing criteria include one or more quantity pricing rules that are associated with each of a number of suppliers and the quantity of the item available at each of the suppliers. Furthermore, the method includes determining one or more suppliers from which the item should be sourced and a quantity of the item to obtain from each such supplier based on the sourcing criteria. In addition, the method includes automatically generating one or more transaction documents that each identify the item and the requested quantity of the item and that include a request that a supplier provide the requested quantity of the item. These transaction documents are communicated to the associated suppliers.

Claims (63)

1. A computer-implemented sourcing system, comprising:

one or more data storage locations on a computer-readable medium comprising sourcing criteria;

a sourcing engine stored on a computer-readable medium and coupled with the one or more data storage locations, the sourcing engine configured to implement the following instructions when executed by a processor:

receive one or more item sourcing requirements, the one or more item sourcing requirements identify an item and a quantity of the item to be sourced from one or more suppliers;

access the sourcing criteria in the one or more data storage locations, the sourcing criteria comprising one or more quantity pricing rules associated with the one or more suppliers, the price and quantity information of the item available at each of the one or more suppliers, and two or more sourcing rules associated with the sourcing of the item, one of the two or more sourcing rules including a minimum sourcing requirement associated with one or more of the one or more suppliers, the two or more sourcing rules further comprising at least one hard sourcing rule and at least one soft sourcing rule, wherein the hard sourcing rule cannot be violated and the soft sourcing rule can be violated;

determine one or more suppliers from which the item should be sourced and a quantity of the item to obtain from each of the one or more suppliers based on the sourcing criteria; and

a transaction execution module on a computer-readable medium and coupled with the sourcing engine, the transaction execution module configured to implement the following instructions when executed by a processor:

receive the determination of the one or more suppliers;

generate one or more transaction documents each identifying the item and the requested quantity of the item, and including a request that a supplier provide the requested quantity of the item; and

communicate the one or more transaction documents to the identified one or more suppliers.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise information identifying approved suppliers of the item, the suppliers used to supply the item being limited to the approved suppliers.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise contractual requirements with one or more suppliers that affect the sourcing of the one or more item sourcing requirements.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise a limit on the amount of parts that may obtained from a particular supplier.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more suppliers from which the item is sourced are determined using a heuristic algorithm, wherein each of the one or more suppliers has an associated minimum requirement of the item that must be obtained from the supplier.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining one or more suppliers from which the item should be sourced comprises:

fulfilling minimum sourcing requirements associated with one or more of the suppliers;

sourcing any remaining required item quantity from the least expensive supplier subject to the quantity of the item available from the least expensive supplier; and

repeating the previous act until all of the required item quantity is sourced.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more item requirements represent the combined item sourcing requirements of multiple entities.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the transaction execution module is further configured to communicate the one or more transaction documents using a communication technique selected from the group consisting of electronic mail, fax, web-based communications, and electronic data interchange (EDI).

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sourcing rules comprise rules selected from the group consisting of:

a rule specifying that the item requirement is sourced at the lowest cost;

a rule limiting the quantity of the item to be sourced from a particular supplier; and

a rule specifying that the number of suppliers for supplying the item should be minimized.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise one or more penalties to enforce the at least one soft sourcing rule, the one or more penalties can allow the at least one soft sourcing rule to be violated without a penalty, based on a sourcing determination.

11. A computer-implemented method of sourcing one or more item sourcing requirements comprising:

receiving, by a computer, one or more item sourcing requirements, the one or more item sourcing requirements identify an item and a quantity of the item that needs to be sourced from one or more suppliers;

accessing, by the computer, one or more sourcing criteria that affect the sourcing of the item, the sourcing criteria comprising one or more quantity pricing rules associated with the one or more suppliers, the price and quantity information of the item available at each of the one or more suppliers, wherein the price and quantity information is provided by the one or more suppliers, and two or more sourcing rules associated with the sourcing of the item, one of the two or more sourcing rules including a minimum sourcing requirement associated with one or more of the one or more suppliers, the two or more sourcing rules further comprising at least one hard sourcing rule and at least one soft sourcing rule, wherein the hard sourcing rule cannot be violated and the soft sourcing rule can be violated;

determining, by the computer, one or more suppliers from which the item should be sourced and a quantity of the item to obtain from each of the one or more suppliers based on the sourcing criteria;

automatically generating, by the computer, one or more transaction documents each identifying the item and the requested quantity of the item, and including a request that a supplier provide the requested quantity of the item; and

communicating, by the computer, the one or more transaction documents to the identified one or more suppliers.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise information identifying approved suppliers of the item, the suppliers used to supply the item being limited to the approved suppliers.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise contractual requirements with one or more suppliers that affect the sourcing of the one or more item sourcing requirements.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise a limit on the amount of parts that may obtained from a particular supplier.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more suppliers from which the item is sourced are determined using a heuristic algorithm, wherein each of the one or more suppliers has an associated minimum requirement of the item that must be obtained from the supplier.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining one or more suppliers from which the item should be sourced comprises: fulfilling minimum sourcing requirements associated with one or more of the suppliers; sourcing any remaining required item quantity from the least expensive supplier subject to the quantity of the item available from the least expensive supplier; and repeating the previous act until all of the required item quantity is sourced.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more item sourcing requirements represent the combined item sourcing requirements of multiple entities.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the transaction documents are communicated using a communication technique selected from the group consisting of electronic mail, fax, web-based communications, and electronic data interchange (EDI).

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the sourcing rules comprise rules selected from the group consisting of:

a rule specifying that the item requirement is sourced at the lowest cost;

a rule limiting the quantity of the item to be sourced from a particular supplier; and

a rule specifying that the number of suppliers for supplying the item should be minimized.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise one or more penalties to enforce the at least one soft sourcing rule, the one or more penalties can allow the at least one soft sourcing rule to be violated without a penalty, based on a sourcing determination.

21. A computer-readable medium storing a plurality of instructions that sources one or more item sourcing requirements, which, when executed by a processor, causes one or more computers to:

receive the one or more item sourcing requirements, the one or more item sourcing requirements identify an item and a quantity of the item to be sourced from one or more suppliers;

access one or more sourcing criteria that affect the sourcing of the item, the sourcing criteria comprising one or more quantity pricing rules associated with the one or more suppliers, the price and quantity information of the item available at each of the one or more suppliers, wherein the price and quantity information is provided by the one or more suppliers, and two or more sourcing rules associated with the sourcing of the item, one of the two or more sourcing rules including a minimum sourcing requirement associated with one or more of the one or more suppliers, the two or more sourcing rules further comprising at least one hard sourcing rule and at least one soft sourcing rule, wherein the hard sourcing rule cannot be violated and the soft sourcing rule can be violated;

determine one or more suppliers from which the item should be sourced and a quantity of the item to obtain from each of the one or more suppliers based on the sourcing criteria;

generate one or more transaction documents each identifying the item and the requested quantity of the item, and including a request that a supplier provide the requested quantity of the item; and

communicate the one or more transaction documents to the identified one or more suppliers.

22. The software of claim 21 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise information identifying approved suppliers of the item, the suppliers used to supply the item being limited to the approved suppliers.

23. The software of claim 21 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise contractual requirements with one or more suppliers that affect the sourcing of the one or more item sourcing requirements.

24. The software of claim 21 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise a limit on the amount of parts that may obtained from a particular supplier.

25. The software of claim 21 , wherein the one or more suppliers from which the item is sourced are determined using a heuristic algorithm, wherein each of the one or more suppliers has an associated minimum requirement of the item that must be obtained from the supplier.

26. The software of claim 21 , wherein determining one or more suppliers from which the item should be sourced comprises:

fulfilling minimum sourcing requirements associated with one or more of the suppliers;

sourcing any remaining required item quantity from the least expensive supplier subject to the quantity of the item available from the least expensive supplier; and

repeating the previous act until all of the required item quantity is sourced.

27. The software of claim 21 , wherein the one or more item sourcing requirements represent the combined item sourcing requirements of multiple entities.

28. The software of claim 21 , wherein the sourcing rules comprise rules selected from the group consisting of:

a rule specifying that the item requirement is sourced at the lowest cost;

a rule limiting the quantity of the item to be sourced from a particular supplier; and

a rule specifying that the number of suppliers for supplying the item should be minimized.

29. The software of claim 21 , wherein the sourcing criteria further comprise one or more penalties to enforce the at least one soft sourcing rule, the one or more penalties can allow the at least one soft sourcing rule.

Assignments (16)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053383/0117) Recorded Nov 3, 2021
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 058794/0776 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 16, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.; BLUE YONDER, INC.; JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC.; I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC; MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC.; MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC.; REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC; JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC.; REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION; BY BOND FINANCE, INC.; BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC.; BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 057724/0593 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REEL 026468 FRAME NUMBER FROM 0199 TO 0119 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 055136 FRAME 0623. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 19, 2021
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 056813/0110 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 026740 FRAME: 0676. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 8, 2021
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 055257/0747 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026468 FRAME 0199. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME FROM I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. TO JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.. Recorded Dec 12, 2020
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 055136/0623 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 3, 2020
From: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053383/0117 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 14, 2020
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 052393/0450 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: RP CROWN PARENT, LLC; RP CROWN HOLDING LLC; JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040326/0449 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0809 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0356 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0697 Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 040337/0053 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0697 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2013
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029556/0809 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Recorded Dec 21, 2012
From: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 029529/0812 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 12, 2011
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 026740/0676 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2011
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC
Reel/Frame 026468/0119 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 4, 2011
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 026072/0353 →