IP Library Granted Patent US 8,527,620
Granted Patent B2
US 8,527,620 · App. 10/383,847 · Granted Sep 3, 2013

E-business competitive measurements

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,527,620
App. No.
10/383,847
Granted
Sep 3, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

An example of a solution provided here comprises providing a generic task list, and applying the generic task list to a first business process and a second business process. Applying the generic task list includes mapping a transaction step in the first business process to a similar transaction step in the second business process. Another example of a solution comprises mapping a transaction step in a first application to a similar transaction step in a second application, a current threshold value, and a supporting application, inputting performance measures for the first and second applications, and outputting a performance comparison report, based on the mapping and the performance measures. The mapping, the inputting, and the outputting may be performed for a plurality of transaction steps in the first application and a plurality of transaction steps in the second application.

Claims (58)

1. A method for doing evaluation in a network environment, said method comprising:

providing a generic task list comprising a plurality of tasks that are frequently performed by end users;

applying said generic task list to a first business process and a second business process;

wherein said applying comprises, for each task within the plurality of tasks, mapping a transaction step in said first business process to a similar transaction step in said second business process and to a current threshold, and applying a script for each task in the generic task list on a set of probes;

receiving performance measures for said first business process and said second business process from the set of probes;

establishing at least one new threshold value for said first business process, based on said performance measures; and

creating a performance comparison report, based on said mapping and said performance measures.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said creating a performance comparison report further comprises associating at least one of said performance measures with a corresponding current threshold value.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

repeating said receiving and said creating, over a time period of at least a plurality of weeks; and

producing a trend report for said time period, based on said performance measures.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

documenting said at least one new threshold value; and

managing said first business process;

whereby said first business process is measured against said at least one new threshold value.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

mapping said transaction step in said first business process to a supporting application.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a report template.

7. A method for doing evaluation in a network environment, said method comprising:

mapping a transaction step in a first application to:

a similar transaction step in a second application;

a current threshold value; and

a supporting application;

applying one or more scripts for the transaction step to a set of probes to collect performance measures for the first and second applications;

inputting the performance measures for said first and second applications to a report generator;

outputting a performance comparison report based on said mapping and said performance measures;

wherein said mapping, said inputting, and said outputting are performed for a plurality of transaction steps in said first application and a plurality of transaction steps in said second application; and

establishing at least one new threshold value for said first application, based on said performance measures.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein said mapping a transaction step in a first application to a similar transaction step further comprises:

mapping by generic task group from a customer's perspective.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein said outputting further comprises:

associating a representation of said transaction step in said first application with representations of:

said similar transaction step in said second application;

a current threshold value;

a supporting application; and

a corresponding set of statistics.

10. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

receiving data from a production environment; and

deriving statistics from said data.

11. A method for doing evaluation in a network environment, the method comprising:

providing a generic task list comprising a plurality of tasks that are frequently performed by end users;

applying the generic task list to a first application and a second application, wherein applying the generic task list to a first application and a second application comprises, for each task within the plurality of tasks:

mapping a transaction step in the first application to:

a similar transaction step in the second application by generic task group from a customer's perspective;

a current threshold value; and

a supporting application;

applying one or more scripts for the transaction step to a set of probes to collect performance measures for the first and second applications;

inputting the statistics and the performance measures for the first and second applications to a report generator; and

outputting a performance comparison report based on the mapping, the statistics, and said performance measures;

establishing at least one new threshold value for the first business process, based on the performance measures;

receiving data from a production environment; and

deriving statistics from the data;

wherein outputting the performance comparison report further comprises:

associating a representation of a given transaction step in the first application with representations of:

the similar transaction step in the second application;

a current threshold value;

a supporting application; and

a corresponding subset of the statistics.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2021
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: KYNDRYL, INC.
Reel/Frame 057885/0644 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 6, 2003
From: OLSSON, STIG ARNE; SMETANKA, TERENCE DALE; VIJAYAN, GEETHA
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 013864/0166 →