IP Library Granted Patent US 7,463,678
Granted Patent B2
US 7,463,678 · App. 10/386,391 · Granted Dec 9, 2008

Equalization scheme for DSL receivers in presence of an under-sampled or over-sampled transmit IDFT

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,463,678
App. No.
10/386,391
Granted
Dec 9, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A circuit and method is provided for reducing the effect of having potentially different sizes for an Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform (IDFT) at a transmitter and a Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) at a receiver in a telecommunications system without requiring a change in the DFT's size. The method includes following steps. The first step includes determining whether the IDFT size is greater than, equal to, or less than the DFT size. The second step includes selecting a target impulse response length from a predefined set of impulse response lengths in accordance with a result the previous step. The third step includes training an equalizer at the receiver to the target impulse response length. The circuit comprises hardware and software for implementing the method.

Claims (30)

1. A method of reducing an effect of having potentially different sizes for an Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform (IDFT) at a transmitter and a Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) at a receiver in a telecommunications system without requiring a change to a DFT size of said DFT, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining whether an IDFT size of said IDFT is greater than, equal to, or less than said DFT size;

(b) selecting a target impulse response length of a desired channel impulse response from a predefined set of impulse response lengths in accordance with a result of step (a); and

(c) training an equalizer at said receiver to said target impulse response length.

2. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said predefined set of impulse response lengths is defined such that transients in a transmission signal coincide with a cyclic prefix of said transmission signal.

3. A method as defined in claim 2 , wherein an initial transient coincides with a cyclic prefix of an associated signal and a final transient coincides with a cyclic prefix of a following signal that follows said associated signal.

4. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein if said IDFT size is equal to said DFT size, said target impulse response length is set to a value equal to or less than a cyclic prefix length at either said transmitter or said receiver plus one.

5. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein if said IDFT size is less than said DFT size, said target impulse response length is set to a value equal to or less than a cyclic prefix length at said receiver plus a ratio between said DFT size and said IDFT size.

6. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein if said IDFT size is greater than said DFT size, said target impulse response length is set to a value equal to or less than a cyclic prefix length at said transmitter plus one.

7. A method as defined by claim 1 , wherein said step (a) is achieved by comparing said IDFT size and said DFT size communicated between said transmitter and said receiver.

8. A method as defined in claim 7 , wherein said IDFT size and said DFT size are communicated between said transmitter and said receiver during handshaking.

9. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said step (a) comprises the following steps:

(d) training said equalizer with a plurality of impulse response lengths;

(e) estimating a per-bin signal-to-noise ratio for each of said plurality of impulse response lengths;

(f) determining a highest signal-to-noise ratio; and

(g) selecting an impulse response length associated with said highest signal-to- noise ratio for use as said target impulse response length.

10. A method as defined in claim 9 , wherein said plurality of impulse response lengths include impulse response lengths ranging from a cyclic prefix length at said receiver to a cyclic prefix length at said receiver plus a maximum expected ratio between said DFT size and said IDFT size.

11. A method as defined in claim 9 , wherein said plurality of impulse response lengths includes an impulse response length equal to a cyclic prefix length at said transmitter plus one.

12. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said equalizer is trained at a impulse response length representing said IDFT size greater than said DFT size, farther comprising the steps of:

(d) defining a time advance interval;

(e) estimating a per-bin signal-to-noise ratio for each of a plurality of predefined values in said time advance interval;

(f) determining a highest signal-to-noise ratio; and

(g) selecting a value in said time advance interval associated with said highest signal-to-noise ratio for selecting an optimal frame alignment.

13. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said equalizer is a time domain equalizer (TDLQ).

14. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said equalizer is a frequency domain equalizer (FDLQ).

15. A method as defined in claim 1 , wherein said IDFT is an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform and said DFT is a Fast Fourier Transform.

16. A digital subscriber line (DSL) telecommunications system including a transmitter and a receiver, said transmitter having an Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform (IDFT) and said receiver having a Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), said DSL telecommunications system including circuitry to perform processing comprising the steps of:

(a) determining whether an IDFT size of said IDFT is greater than, equal to, or less than a DFT size of said DFT;

(b) selecting a target impulse response length of a desired channel impulse response from a predefined set of impulse response lengths in accordance with a result of step (a); and

(c) training an equalizer at said receiver to said target impulse response length.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 065630/0232 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2019
From: CIENA CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 050969/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 30, 2019
From: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 050938/0389 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 16, 2014
From: CIENA CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 033347/0260 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2014
From: CIENA CORPORATION
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
Reel/Frame 033329/0417 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 15, 2005
From: CATENA NETWORKS, INC.
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015904/0969 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2003
From: GINESI, ALBERTO; ZHANG, SONG; DECZKY, ANDREW; BAIRD, DUNCAN; BOURGET, CHRISTIAN
To: CATENA NETWORKS CANADA INC.
Reel/Frame 014252/0490 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2003
From: GINESI, ALBERTO; ZHANG, SONG; DECZKY, ANDREW; BAIRD, DUNCAN; BOURGET, CHRISTIAN
To: CATENA NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 014252/0476 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2003
From: CATENA NETWORKS CANADA, INC.
To: CATENA NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 014252/0493 →