IP Library Granted Patent US 7,408,884
Granted Patent B2
US 7,408,884 · App. 10/401,010 · Granted Aug 5, 2008

Methods and devices for correlating audio sample comparisons and network performance statistics

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,408,884
App. No.
10/401,010
Granted
Aug 5, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and devices for evaluating audio quality in a network are described. First and second audio samples are compared. The first audio sample includes a reference signal that is transmitted through a path on the network. The second audio sample includes the reference signal after it has traveled the path and is received. In addition, network performance while the reference signal travels the path is monitored. The results of the comparison are correlated with network performance statistics derived from the monitoring.

Claims (32)

1. A method of evaluating audio quality of a network, said method comprising:

comparing first and second audio samples, said first audio sample comprising a reference signal transmitted through a path on said network and said second audio sample comprising said reference signal after the reference signal has traveled said path;

monitoring network performance while said reference signal travels said path;

correlating results of said comparing with network performance information obtained from said monitoring; and

presenting to a user via a graphical user interface, as a function of time, the correlated results and network performance information, thereby enabling a user to better evaluate a cause of degradation in the audio quality of the network.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said comparing uses a technique selected from the group consisting of Perceptual Speech Quality Measurement (PSQM), Perceptual Analysis/Measurement System (PAMS), and Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESO).

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said network performance information is selected from the group consisting of lost packet events, early arrival packet events, late arrival packet events, jitter statistics, vocoder change events, codec change events, silence packet events, and jitter buffer depth.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said network performance information is collected using a protocol selected from the group consisting of Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) and Real-Time Control Protocol (RTCP).

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said correlating is performed in real-time.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein information for said comparing and from said monitoring is recorded and post-processed.

7. A device comprising:

a memory; and

a processor coupled to said memory, said processor for executing a method of evaluating audio quality of a network, said method comprising:

receiving results of a comparison between first and second audio samples, said first audio sample comprising a reference signal transmitted through a path on said network and said second audio sample comprising said reference signal received after traveling said path;

receiving network performance statistics collected while said reference signal traveled said path;

correlating said results of said comparison with said network performance statistics; and

causing the correlated results and network performance statistics to be presented to a user as a function of time, via a graphical user interface, thereby enabling a user to better evaluate a cause of degradation in the audio quality of the network.

8. The device of claim 7 wherein said comparison uses a technique selected from the group consisting of Perceptual Speech Quality Measurement (PSQM), Perceptual Analysis/Measurement System (PAMS), and Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ).

9. The device of claim 7 wherein said network performance statistics are selected from the group consisting of lost packet events, early arrival packet events, late arrival packet events, jitter statistics, vocoder change events, codec change events, silence packet events, and jitter buffer depth.

10. The device of claim 7 wherein said network performance statistics are collected using a protocol selected from the group consisting of Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) and Real-Time Control Protocol (RTCP).

11. The device of claim 7 wherein said method further comprises:

performing said comparison between said first and second audio samples.

12. The device of claim 7 wherein said method further comprises:

monitoring said network to collect said network performance statistics.

13. A computer-usable medium having computer-readable program code embodied therein for causing a computer system to perform a method of assessing audio quality of a network, said method comprising:

performing a comparison of first and second audio samples, said first audio sample comprising a reference signal transmitted through a path on said network and said second audio sample comprising said reference signal after the reference signal has traversed said path;

receiving network performance statistics collected while said reference signal traversed said path;

correlating results of said comparison to said network performance statistics; and

presenting to a user via a graphical user interface, as a function of time, the correlated results and network performance statistics, thereby enabling a user to better evaluate a cause of degradation in the audio quality of the network.

14. The computer-usable medium of claim 13 wherein said comparison uses a technique selected from the group consisting of Perceptual Speech Quality Measurement (PSQM), Perceptual Analysis/Measurement System (PAMS), and Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ).

15. The computer-usable medium of claim 13 wherein said network performance statistics are selected from the group consisting of lost packet events, early arrival packet events, late arrival packet events, jitter statistics, vocoder change events, codec change events, silence packet events, and jitter buffer depth.

16. The computer-usable medium of claim 13 wherein said network performance statistics are collected using a protocol selected from the group consisting of Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) and Real-Time Control Protocol (RTCP).

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 73189/0873 Recorded May 28, 2026
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: INERTIAL LABS, INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS LICENSING LLC
Reel/Frame 075642/0381 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2025
From: VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS LICENSING LLC; INERTIAL LABS, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 073571/0137 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 21, 2025
From: INERTIAL LABS, INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS LICENSING LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 073189/0873 →
TERMINATIONS OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 052729, FRAME 0321 Recorded Jan 5, 2022
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; RPC PHOTONICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 058666/0639 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2020
From: VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; 3Z TELECOM, INC.; ACTERNA LLC; ACTERNA WG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC; VIAVI SOLUTIONS LLC; JDSU ACTERNA HOLDINGS LLC; OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, LLC; RPC PHOTONICS, INC.; TTC INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 052729/0321 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 6, 2015
From: JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
To: VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 037057/0627 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2013
From: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030088/0468 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2004
From: BAUER, SAMUEL M.; QUAN, JAMES P.
To: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 014976/0621 →