IP Library Granted Patent US 6,989,100
Granted Patent B2
US 6,989,100 · App. 10/435,581 · Granted Jan 24, 2006

Methods for time-alignment of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,989,100
App. No.
10/435,581
Granted
Jan 24, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

Nonlinear retention time variations in chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets are adjusted by time-alignment methods, enabling automated comparison of spectra for differential phenotyping and other applications.

Claims (57)

1. A computer-implemented method for time-aligning at least two chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets, each comprising a plurality of mass chromatograms, said method comprising:

a) computing a distance function between said data sets in dependence on at least two mass chromatograms from each data set; and

b) aligning said data sets by minimizing said distance function to obtain aligned data sets.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein one of said data sets is a reference data set and one of said data sets is a test data set, and wherein said test data set is aligned to said reference data set.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said data sets are liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said distance function is computed in dependence on between about 200 and about 400 mass chromatograms from each data set.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting said at least two mass chromatograms according to a selection criterion.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said distance function is computed in dependence on a chromatogram-dependent weighting factor.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein said chromatogram-dependent weighting factor is a function of at least one of a peak number, an intensity threshold, and a signal-to-noise ratio.

8. A method for comparing at least two samples, comprising:

a) performing chromatography-mass spectrometry on each sample to obtain at least two data sets, each comprising a plurality of mass chromatograms;

b) computing a distance function between two selected data sets in dependence on at least two mass chromatograms from each selected data set;

c) aligning said selected data sets by minimizing said distance function to obtain aligned selected data sets; and

d) comparing said aligned selected data sets.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein one of said selected data sets is a reference data set and another of said selected data sets is a test data set, and wherein said test data set is aligned to said reference data set.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein said chromatography-mass spectrometry is liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

11. The method of claim 8 , further comprising aligning two additional data sets, wherein at least one of said additional data sets differs from said selected data sets.

12. The method of claim 8 , further comprising selecting said at least two mass chromatograms according to a selection criterion.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein said selection criterion is a user-provided selection criterion.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein said selection criterion comprises an intensity threshold.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein said selection criterion comprises a number of chromatograms.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein said selection criterion comprises an orthogonality metric.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein said selection criterion comprises a retention time range.

18. The method of claim 8 , wherein said distance function is computed in dependence on between about 200 and about 400 mass chromatograms.

19. The method of claim 8 , wherein said distance function is computed in dependence on between about 200 and about 300 mass chromatograms.

20. The method of claim 8 , wherein said distance function is computed in dependence on about 200 mass chromatograms.

21. The method of claim 8 , wherein said distance function is computed in dependence on a weighting factor.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein said weighting factor is a chromatogram-dependent weighting factor.

23. The method of claim 22 , wherein said chromatogram-dependent weighting factor is a function of at least one of a peak number, an intensity threshold, and a signal-to-noise ratio.

24. The method of claim 8 , further comprising identifying features that differentiate said aligned selected data sets.

25. A method for identifying a biomarker differentiating two cohorts, comprising:

a) comparing at least two samples according to the method of claim 10 , at least one each of said samples representing a different one of said two cohorts; and

b) identifying a biomarker in dependence on said comparison.

26. A diagnostic method comprising detecting a biomarker identified by the method of claim 25 .

27. A computer-implemented method for time-aligning at least two two-dimensional chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets, comprising:

a) selecting peaks in said data sets;

b) identifying potentially corresponding peaks from said selected peaks; and

c) performing a locally-weighted regression smoothing on said potentially corresponding peaks to obtain aligned data sets.

28. The method of claim 27 , wherein one of said data sets is a reference data set and one of said data sets is a test data set, and wherein said test data set is aligned to said reference data set.

29. The method of claim 27 , wherein said data sets are liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets.

30. The method of claim 27 , wherein said locally-weighted regression smoothing is a robust locally-weighted regression smoothing.

31. The method of claim 30 , wherein said robust locally-weighted regression smoothing comprises robust LOESS.

32. The method of claim 27 , wherein said peaks are selected automatically.

33. The method of claim 27 , wherein said locally-weighted regression smoothing is performed in dependence on a span.

34. A method for comparing at least two samples, comprising:

a) performing chromatography-mass spectrometry on each sample to obtain at least two two-dimensional data sets;

b) selecting peaks in two selected data sets;

c) identifying potentially corresponding peaks from said selected peaks;

d) performing a locally-weighted regression smoothing on said potentially corresponding peaks to obtain aligned selected data sets; and

e) comparing said aligned selected data sets.

35. The method of claim 34 , wherein one of said selected data sets is a reference data set and another of said selected data sets is a test data set, and wherein said test data set is aligned to said reference data set.

36. The method of claim 34 , wherein said chromatography-mass spectrometry is liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

37. The method of claim 34 , further comprising aligning two additional data sets, wherein at least one of said additional data sets differs from said selected data sets.

38. The method of claim 34 , further comprising identifying features that differentiate said aligned selected data sets.

39. A method for identifying a biomarker differentiating two cohorts, comprising:

a) comparing at least two samples according to the method of claim 34 , at least one each of said samples representing a different one of said two cohorts; and

b) identifying a biomarker in dependence on said comparison.

Assignments (8)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 12, 2013
From: CAPRION PROTEOMICS USA, LLC
To: NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
Reel/Frame 029969/0015 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2013
From: PPD BIOMARKER DISCOVERY SCIENCES, LLC
To: CAPRION PROTEOMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 029792/0881 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 2, 2010
From: PPD BIOMARKER DISCOVERY SCIENCES, LLC
To: INVESTISSEMENT QUEBEC
Reel/Frame 024170/0737 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 14, 2005
From: PPD BIOMARKER SERVICES, LLC
To: PPD BIOMARKER DISCOVERY SCIENCES, LLC
Reel/Frame 016263/0193 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 14, 2005
From: SURROMED, LLC
To: PPD BIOMARKER SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 016263/0117 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 4, 2005
From: SM PURCHASE COMPANY, LLC
To: SURROMED, LLC
Reel/Frame 015972/0085 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2005
From: SURROMED, INC.
To: SM PURCHASE COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 015972/0122 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2003
From: NORTON, SCOTT M
To: SURROMED, INC.
Reel/Frame 014110/0488 →