IP Library Granted Patent US 6,876,458
Granted Patent B2
US 6,876,458 · App. 10/478,121 · Granted Apr 5, 2005

Method and device for determining the absolute coordinates of an object

Assignee: Steinbichler Optotechnik GmbH
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,876,458
App. No.
10/478,121
Granted
Apr 5, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a method for determining the absolute coordinates of an object ( 1 ), the object ( 1 ) is exposed to light ( 3 ) through a projection grid ( 2 ). The light ( 4 ) reflected by the object 1 is registered by a sensor ( 5 ). The image picked up by the sensor is evaluated. In order to improve such a method, the projection grid ( 2 ) comprises a first grid with a first grid vector (G 1 ), and a second grid with a second grid vector (G 2 ) which differs from said first grid vector. The sensor ( 5 ) is arranged at a distance (b) from the projection grid ( 2 ) such that the projections (b x , b y ), of the base vector (b) leading from the first and from the second grids to the sensor ( 5 ), onto the associated grid vectors (G 1 , G 2 ) differ in size.

Claims (49)

1. A method for determining the absolute coordinates of an object ( 1 ) in which the method

the object ( 1 ) is exposed to light ( 3 ) through a projection grid ( 2 );

the light ( 4 ) reflected by the object ( 1 ) is registered by a sensor ( 5 ); and

the image picked up by the sensor ( 5 ) is evaluated, wherein

the projection grid ( 2 ) comprises a first grid with a first grid vector (G 1 ), and a second grid with a second grid vector (G 2 ) which differs from said first grid vector,

and the sensor ( 5 ) is arranged at a distance (b) from the projection grid ( 2 ) such that the projections (b x , b y ), of the base vector (b) leading from the first and from the second grids to the sensor ( 5 ), onto the associated grid vectors (G 1 , G 2 ) differ in size.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the distance (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that the object ( 1 ) or a significant area of the object or a discontinuity of the object is covered by a period of the grid which is evaluated at reduced sensitivity.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the spacing (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that evaluation of the grid evaluated at increased sensitivity takes place at adequate evaluation accuracy or at the best possible evaluation accuracy.

4. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the distance (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that the object ( 1 ) or a significant area of the object or a discontinuity of the object is covered by a first number of periods of the first grid and by a second number of periods of the second grid, which second number differs from the first number.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the spacing (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that evaluation of the grid evaluated at increased sensitivity takes place at adequate evaluation accuracy or at the best possible evaluation accuracy.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the distance (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that the object ( 1 ) or a significant area of the object or a discontinuity of the object is covered by a first number of periods of the first grid and by a second number of periods of the second grid, which second number differs from the first number.

7. A method according to claim 6 , wherein the first number and the second number are relatively prime.

8. the method according to claim 6 , wherein the ratio of the first number to the second number corresponds to a transient number.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the distance (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that a period of the grid evaluated at reduced sensitivity and/or of the grid evaluated at increased sensitivity covers four pixels on the sensor ( 5 ).

10. The method according to any one of claim 1 , wherein the grid vectors (G 1 , G 2 ) are aligned at right angles in relation to each other.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the grids are formed by a cross grid.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the grids differ from each other.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein several sensors ( 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ) are provided.

14. The method according to claim 13 , wherein two sensors are provided.

15. The method according to claim 1 , wherein several projection grids ( 8 , 9 ) are provided.

16. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the image made by the sensor is evaluated by a phase shift.

17. The method according to claim 1 , wherein a coloured projection grid is used.

18. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the projection grid is rotated.

19. The method according to claim 1 , wherein several images are made.

20. A device for determining the absolute coordinates of an object ( 1 ), comprising projection optics for a projection grid ( 2 ) onto the object ( 1 ) and sensor optics comprising a sensor ( 5 ) for registering the light reflected by the object ( 1 ), wherein

the projection grid ( 2 ) comprises a first grid with a first grid vector (G 1 ), and a second grid with a second grid vector (G 2 ) which differs from said first grid vector,

and the sensor ( 5 ) is arranged at a distance (b) from the projection grid ( 2 ) such that the projections (b x , b y ), of the base vector (b) leading from the first and from the second grids to the sensor ( 5 ), onto the associated grid vectors (G 1 , G 2 ) differ in size.

21. The device according to claim 20 , wherein the distance (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that the object ( 1 ) or a significant area of the object or a discontinuity of the object is covered by a period of the grid which is evaluated at reduced sensitivity.

22. The device according to claim 20 , wherein the spacing (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that the object ( 1 ) or a significant area of the object or a discontinuity of the object is covered by a period of the grid which is evaluated at reduced sensitivity.

23. The device according to claim 20 , wherein the distance (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that the object ( 1 ) or a significant area of the object or a discontinuity of the object is covered by a first number of periods of the first grid and by a second number of periods of the second grid, which second number differs from the first number.

24. The device according to claim 20 , wherein the distance (b) between the sensor ( 5 ) and the grids is selected such that a period of the grid evaluated at reduced sensitivity and/or of the grid evaluated at increased sensitivity covers four pixels on the sensor ( 5 ).

25. The device according to claim 20 , wherein the grid vectors (G 1 , G 2 ) are aligned at right angles in relation to each other.

26. The device of claim 25 , wherein the grids are formed by a cross grid.

27. The device according to claim 20 , comprising several sensors ( 10 , 11 , 12 ; 13 , 14 ).

28. The device according to claim 20 , comprising several projection grids ( 8 , 9 ).

29. The device according to claim 20 , comprising means for evaluating the image made by the sensor by phase shift.

30. The device according to claim 20 , comprising a colored projection grid.

31. The device according to claim 20 , comprising means for rotating the projection grid.

32. The device according to claim 20 , structured and arranged such that the projection (b x ) of the base vector (b) onto the first grid vector (G 1 ) is larger than the projection (b y ) of the base vector (b) onto the second grid vector (G 2 ),

on the sensor ( 5 ), a first vector (a x ) of evaluation is substantially parallel to the first grid vector (G 1 ) and a second vector (a y ) of evaluation is substantially parallel to the second grid vector (G 2 ),

evaluation in the direction (x) of the first grid vector (G 1 ) takes place with greater sensitivity than in the direction (y) of the second grid vector (G 2 ), and

sensitivity increases with increase in length of the base vector (b) or triangulation angle (γ) defined between a line ( 3 ) from a point ( 6 ) on the object ( 1 ) to the projection grid ( 2 ) and a line ( 4 ) from the object point ( 6 ) to the sensor ( 5 ).

33. The device of claim 20 , comprising

a first projector ( 8 ) having a grid comprising the first grid vector (G 1 ) and a second projector ( 9 ) having a grid comprising the second grid vector (G 2 ), the first and second projectors ( 8 , 9 ) aligned at right angles and spaced apart with respect to one another along a line extending perpendicularly to a line from the first projector ( 8 ) to a camera of the sensor ( 5 ).

34. The device of claim 20 , comprising

a single projector ( 8 ) and three cameras ( 10 , 11 , 12 ) of the sensor ( 5 ) spaced apart from one another along a line extending from the projector ( 8 ).

35. The device according to claim 20 , comprising

a single projector ( 8 ) arranged at an origin of an X-Y coordinate system and two cameras ( 13 , 14 ) of the sensor ( 5 ), and

with a first camera ( 13 ) positioned in a first quadrant of the X-Y coordinate system, closer to the X-axis than the Y-axis thereof, and outside a line extending from the projector ( 8 ) to a second camera ( 14 ).

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 21, 2018
From: STEINBICHLER OPTOTECHNIK GMBH
To: CARL ZEISS OPTOTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 045272/0954 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2005
From: KRAUS, ANTON
To: STEINBICHLER OPTOTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 016332/0075 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 102 12 364 · Mar 20, 2002 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20040150836A1 · Aug 5, 2004