IP Library Granted Patent US 7,166,722
Granted Patent B2
US 7,166,722 · App. 10/532,104 · Granted Jan 23, 2007

N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-n′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea salt in crystalline form

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,166,722
App. No.
10/532,104
Granted
Jan 23, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides a crystal of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl) urea. This crystal of salt is usable for the therapy of a disease selected from the group consisting of tumors, diabetic retinopathy, chronic rheumatism, psoriasis, atherosclerosis, Kaposi's sarcoma, and exudation type age-related maculopathy, and has characteristics suitable for applications of oral pharmaceutical preparations.

Claims (93)

1. Crystalline N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea monohydrochloric acid salt monohydrate.

2. The crystalline compound according to claim 1 , wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystalline compound has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ):

TABLE A-1

Diffraction angle (2θ)

11.47 ± X

22.59 ± X

23.02 ± X

26.27 ± X

26.63 ± X

wherein X is 0 to 0.20.

3. The crystalline compound according to claim 2 , wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 15%.

4. The crystalline compound according to claim 2 , wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 20%.

5. The crystalline compound according to claim 2 , wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 25%.

6. The crystalline compound according to claim 2 , wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 30%.

7. The crystalline compound according to any one of claims 2 to 6 , wherein X is 0 to 0.10.

8. The crystalline compound according to claim 1 , wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystalline compound has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ):

TABLE B-1

Diffraction angle (2θ)

 8.76 ± X

11.47 ± X

15.28 ± X

17.16 ± X

17.53 ± X

18.80 ± X

20.02 ± X

22.59 ± X

23.02 ± X

25.32 ± X

25.43 ± X

26.27 ± X

26.63 ± X

27.00 ± X

28.57 ± X

wherein X is 0 to 0.20.

9. The crystalline compound according to claim 8 , wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 15%.

10. The crystalline compound according to claim 8 , wherein the relative intensity in said diffraction angles (2θ) is not less than 20%.

11. The crystalline compound according to any one of claims 8 to 10 , wherein X is 0 to 0.10.

12. The crystalline compound according to claim 1 , wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystalline compound has the following diffraction angles (2θ) and relative intensities:

TABLE 1

Diffraction angle (2θ)

Relative intensity

8.76

22

11.47

100

15.28

21

17.16

21

17.53

23

18.80

21

20.02

25

22.59

35

23.02

37

25.32

29

25.43

23

26.27

36

26.63

32

27.00

29

28.57

28.

13. A process for producing a crystal N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea, monhydrochloric acid salt monohydrate, said process comprising the steps of:

adding hydrochloric acid to a solution of N-{2-chloro-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinolyl)oxy]phenyl}-N′-(5-methyl-3-isoxazolyl)urea in an aprotic polar solvent selected from N,N-dimethylformamide and N,N-dimethylacetamide;

adding ethanol and water to the above solution to precipitating crystals from the solution.

14. The process according to claim 13 , wherein said hydrochloric acid has a concentration of 10 to 14 N.

15. The process according to claim 13 , wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystal has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ):

TABLE A-1

Diffraction angle (2θ)

11.47 ± X

22.59 ± X

23.02 ± X

26.27 ± X

26.63 ± X

wherein X is 0 to 0.20.

16. The process according to claim 14 , wherein in powder X-ray diffractometry, the crystal has peaks with not less than 10% relative intensity at least the following diffraction angles (2θ):

TABLE A-1

Diffraction angle (2θ)

11.47 ± X

22.59 ± X

23.02 ± X

26.27 ± X

26.63 ± X

wherein X is 0 to 0.20.

Assignments (7)
MERGER Recorded May 26, 2021
From: KIRIN PHARMA COMPANY, LIMITED (A/K/A KIRIN PHARMA KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
To: KYOWA HAKKO KOGYO CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 056351/0089 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE AND ASSIGNOR'S NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 022390 FRAME 0234. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded May 26, 2021
From: KYOWA HAKKO KOGYO CO., LTD.
To: KYOWA HAKKO KIRIN CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 056583/0647 →
CHANGE OF NAME AND ADDRESS Recorded Oct 23, 2019
From: KYOWA HAKKO KIRIN CO., LTD.
To: KYOWA KIRIN CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 050797/0533 →
MERGER Recorded Mar 13, 2009
From: KIRIN PHARMA CO., LTD.
To: KYOWA HAKKO KIRIN CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 022390/0234 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 26, 2008
From: KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
To: KIRIN HOLDINGS KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 021147/0855 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2008
From: KIRIN HOLDINGS KABUSHIKI KAISHA
To: KIRIN PHARMA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 021138/0257 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 12, 2006
From: MATSUNAGA, NAOKI; YOSHIDA, SATOSHI; YOSHINO, AYAKO; NAKAJIMA, TATSUO
To: KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 018298/0289 →