IP Library Granted Patent US 7,577,489
Granted Patent B2
US 7,577,489 · App. 10/585,125 · Granted Aug 18, 2009

Method and device for measuring, determining and controlling flatness of a metal strip

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,577,489
App. No.
10/585,125
Granted
Aug 18, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for optimizing measurement and control of the flatness of a strip of rolled material. A mapping is accomplished by associating to relevant flatness fault types a reference strip model and an actuator space conversion matrix. A device for optimizing measurement and control of the flatness of a strip of rolled material.

Claims (55)

1. A method for optimizing measurement and control of the flatness of a strip of rolled material, the method comprising:

measuring a flatness of the strip,

obtaining a visual image of the strip,

determining a relevant flatness fault type by comparing the visual image to one or more reference strip models for known flatness fault types,

fusion or morphing the measured flatness with the determined relevant flatness fault type, and

controlling flatness by comparing the fused or morphed measured flatness with a target flatness profile to determine a flatness error.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

making a mapping between measurement and control by associating to relevant flatness fault types a reference strip model and the actuator space conversion matrix.

3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

making an enhanced mapping between measurement and control by an actuator correction algorithm using morphed information.

4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

mapping each reference strip model to a corresponding vector space conversion matrix according to the flatness fault type.

5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting a reference strip model by comparing available reference strip models with the strip.

6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising:

enhancing the measured data by interpolating the reference model with measured flatness data.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the measured data is enhanced by using morphing.

8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

creating a set of space conversion matrices, which are known to correct the known flatness fault types by optimally qualifying actuator behavior during flatness control for the given flatness error type,

choosing an associated actuator space conversion matrix, and

optimizing the flatness control with the space conversion matrix.

9. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

converting the visual image of the strip to a visualization format used for the reference strip models.

10. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

having visual access to the strip by an operator.

11. The method according to claim 9 , further comprising:

comparing the reference strip models with the strip visualization format.

12. The method according to claim 11 , wherein the comparison is carried out automatically, the method further comprising:

manually tuning an automatic comparison.

13. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

synchronizing measured data with video samples and with a currently performed optimization algorithm.

14. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

using a morphing technique.

15. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising:

morphing from the reference model to the measured data by adding a result of the mapping to the reference model.

16. A device for optimizing measurement and control of the flatness of a strip of rolled material, the device comprising:

a flatness measurement device configured to measure a flatness of the strip,

a visualization device configured to obtain a visual image of the strip,

a comparison device configured to determine a relevant flatness fault type by comparing the visual image to one or more reference strip models for known flatness types,

a morphing unit configured to fuse or morph the measured flatness with the determined relevant flatness fault type,

a flatness control configured to control flatness by comparing the fused or morphed measured flatness with a target flatness profile to determine a flatness error.

17. The device according to claim 16 , wherein the flatness control is configured to associate to relevant flatness fault types a reference strip model and an actuator space conversion matrix.

18. The device according to claim 16 , wherein the flatness control is configured to make a mapping between measurement and control.

19. The device according to claim 16 , wherein the flatness control is configured to make a mapping between measurement and control by an actuator correction algorithm.

20. The device according to claim 16 , wherein the flatness control is configured to make a mapping each reference strip model to a corresponding vector space conversion matrix according to the flatness fault type.

21. A computer program product, comprising:

a computer readable medium; and

computer program code means recorded on the computer readable medium and executable by a processor for carrying out the steps of

measuring a flatness of the strip,

obtaining a visual image of the strip,

determining a relevant flatness fault type by comparing the visual image to one or more reference strip models for known flatness fault types,

fusion or morphing the measured flatness with the determined relevant flatness fault type, and

controlling flatness by comparing the fused or morphed measured flatness with a target flatness profile to determine a flatness error.

22. The computer program product, according to claim 21 , wherein the computer program code means is for carry out the further step of at least partially providing the computer program through a network.

23. The computer program product, according to claim 21 , wherein the computer program code means is for carry out the further step of at least partially providing the computer program through the internet.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2018
From: ABB AB
To: ABB SCHWEIZ AG
Reel/Frame 045713/0398 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2007
From: FODOR, GEORGE; MIKKELSEN, CHRISTINE
To: ABB AB
Reel/Frame 019591/0251 →