IP Library Granted Patent US 7,650,019
Granted Patent B2
US 7,650,019 · App. 10/593,896 · Granted Jan 19, 2010

Method for the early identification of a deviation in the printed images that have been created by a printing press during continuous production

Assignee: Koenig & Bauer Aktiengesellschaft
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,650,019
App. No.
10/593,896
Granted
Jan 19, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method is used for the early identification of a deviation in the printed images which have been formed by a printing press during continuous production. A second decision threshold is provided, in addition to a decision regarding good or bad print quality. A current printed image, that has been captured, is compared with a reference image. If the current image deviates from the reference image, that deviation is evaluated using two decision thresholds.

Claims (25)

1. A method for detecting an error in printed images generated by a printing press including:

providing a scanning color camera;

using said scanning color camera for recording a reference image having a reference image pixel field consisting of several reference image pixels;

determining a maximum value and a minimum value of amplitude values of said several reference image pixels in said reference image pixel field;

storing said maximum value and said minimum value of each said reference image pixel as its reference image;

producing a plurality of actual printed images in the course of an ongoing printing process using said printing press;

using said scanning color camera for recording said actual images having an actual image pixel field consisting of several actual image pixels;

determining a maximum value and a minimum value of amplitude values of said several actual image pixels in said actual image pixel field;

determining a deviation between said reference image pixel amplitude value and said actual image pixel amplitude value;

providing a first, lower decision threshold value for said deviation and a second, higher decision threshold value for said deviation; and

classifying said printed product as having poor quality when said deviation exceeds both of said first and second decision values.

2. The method of claim 1 further including providing said first lower decision threshold, with a lower deviation, constituting a warning threshold and providing said second upper decision threshold, with a higher deviation, constituting an error threshold.

3. The method of claim 2 further including, by adjusting said first and second thresholds, determining a value for generating either said warning or said error.

4. The method of claim 2 further including generating a warning report when said warning threshold is reached.

5. The method of claim 2 further including generating an error report when said error threshold is reached.

6. The method of claim 2 further including issuing a warning when said deviation is between said warning threshold and said error threshold.

7. The method of claim 1 further including determining a contrast between said actually recorded printed image and said reference image and evaluating said contrast as a deviation between said actually recorded printed image and said reference image.

8. The method of claim 2 further including determining whether several pixels in said actual image pixel field exceed one of said warning threshold and said error threshold.

9. The method of claim 8 further including determining said pixel field by selecting several pixels arranged adjacent each other and having said amplitude values showing a deviation from said reference value.

10. The method of claim 9 further including determining said area of said pixel field where said deviation lies above said error threshold.

11. The method of claim 1 further including setting an error weight for a local area of said pixel field, said error weight constituting a value for all of said deviations which are permissible in said local area of said pixel field, and reporting an error when said error weight is exceeded.

12. The method of claim 1 further including providing a monitor and providing a display of said deviation on said monitor.

13. The method of claim 12 further including displaying said deviation on said monitor and superimposing said display on a display of said actual printed image.

14. The method of claim 12 further including using said display and showing a deviation in a quality of said actual printed image.

15. The method of claim 1 further including providing said scanning camera as one of a line-scanning camera and an area-scanning camera.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 28, 2015
From: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: KOENIG & BAUER AG
Reel/Frame 036987/0915 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2006
From: TURKE, THOMAS; WILLEKE, HARALD HEINRICH
To: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 018356/0141 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2004 014 547 · Mar 23, 2004 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20080212844A1 · Sep 4, 2008