IP Library Patent Application 10598266
Patent Application
App. No. 10/598,266

Method Of Selecting Operational Parameters In A Communication Network

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
10/598,266
Abstract

The present invention provides a method of selecting operational parameters of a communication network. The method is characterised by searching the operational parameter space using a multiple objective simulated annealing (MOSA) process, wherein the objectives are based upon performance indicators (PIs) of the communication network. Moreover, the MOSA process generates an archive of estimated values of a Pareto front, and employs a dominance-based energy function. The present invention thus provides the benefit of enabling assessment of different estimated optimal trade-offs between multiple objectives.

Claims (57)

1 . A method of selecting operational parameters of a communication network, characterised by;

searching an operational parameter space using a multiple objective simulated annealing (MOSA) process wherein;

the objectives are based upon performance indicators of the communication network;

the MOSA process generates an archive of estimated values of a Pareto front; and

the MOSA process employs a dominance-based energy function.

2 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein the dominance-based energy function, E(x), is defined substantially as

E ( x )=μ( {tilde over (F)} x ),

where μ is a measure defined on {tilde over (F)} x , and {tilde over (F)} x is defined substantially as

{tilde over (F)} x ={yε{tilde over (F)}|yx},

such that {tilde over (F)} x is the set of elements of {tilde over (F)} that dominate solution x, where {tilde over (F)} is the union of the current set of mutually non-dominating solutions found, with the current solution x and the proposed perturbed solution x′.

3 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein the difference in the dominance-based energy function between current solution x and proposed perturbed solution x′ is evaluated substantially as

δ

E

(

x

,

x

)

=

1

F

~

(

F

~

x

-

F

~

x

)

,

all terms as defined herein.

4 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein additional values of the estimated Pareto front are obtained by randomly sampling an attainment surface of the archive of estimated values of the Pareto front.

5 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein the MOSA process may propose a perturbation to the present solution x that is scaled using one of two scaling schemes;

i. transversal scaling

ii. location scaling

6 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein objectives may be based upon performance indicators of the communication network from any or all of the following categories;

i. Capacity;

ii. Coverage; and

iii. Quality of service.

7 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein cost values are applied the objectives and/or the operational parameters according to a given scenario.

8 . A method according to claim 7 , wherein the solution with the lowest cost within the archive of estimated values of the Pareto front is chosen for a given scenario.

9 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein the operational parameter values associated with a chosen solution are incorporated within the communication network.

10 . (canceled)

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2015
From: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
To: GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 035465/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2006
From: SMITH, KEVIN I.; EVERSON, RICHARD M.; FIELDSEND, JONATHAN E.; RASHMI, MISRA
To: MOTOROLA, INC.
Reel/Frame 018156/0846 →