IP Library Granted Patent US 8,326,712
Granted Patent B2
US 8,326,712 · App. 10/628,731 · Granted Dec 4, 2012

Method and system for technology consumption management

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,326,712
App. No.
10/628,731
Granted
Dec 4, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for tracking expenditures incurred by an entity involves determining the costs incurred, reading a file containing business model information, and allocating the costs according to the business model information. The business model information includes information regarding the internal structure of the entity including groups and sub-groups within the entity. Furthermore, value drivers of the entity and application profiles of the entity are also taken into consideration in determining whether various groups and sub-groups within the entity are performing optimally.

Claims (47)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, by a computer based system for managing asset consumption, billing information associated with consumption of computer-related hardware processing resources from a computer-related hardware processing resource provider, wherein the billing information includes a unique hardware processing job identifier which identifies a specific project associated with each hardware processing job executed by the computer-related hardware processing resource provider for an entity;

reading, by the computer based system, a business model file comprising a business dimension within the entity, the business dimension including organizational information including a list of a plurality of groups within the entity;

calculating, by the computer based system, a benefit of each hardware processing job;

allocating, by the computer based system, the billing information by associating each of the received unique hardware processing job identifiers to a group in the plurality of groups;

displaying, by the computer based system, the costs incurred by each group graphically during different time periods;

assessing, by the computer based system, benefits of each hardware processing job as compared with the costs of each hardware processing job; and

making, by the computer based system, a value based decision based on the assessment.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the business dimension further comprises a business process and an associated business performance metric.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the allocating step further comprises determining a total cost associated with computer-related hardware processing resources from the provider incurred by each group.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the reading step further comprises:

determining an internal structure of the entity, including the plurality of groups within the entity;

determining a billing detail of the plurality of groups within the entity; and

determining an application profile of the entity.

5. A computer based system, comprising:

a computer network communicating with a memory;

the memory communicating with a processor for managing asset consumption; and

the processor, when executing a computer program, is configured to:

receive, by the computer based system, billing information associated with consumption of computer-related hardware processing resources from a computer-related hardware processing resource provider, wherein the billing information includes a unique hardware processing job identifier which identifies a specific project associated with each hardware processing job executed by the computer-related hardware processing resource provider for an entity;

read, by the computer based system, a business model file comprising a business dimension within the entity, the business dimension including organizational information including a list of a plurality of groups within the entity;

calculate, by the computer based system, a benefit of each hardware processing job;

display, by the computer based system, the costs incurred by each group graphically during different time periods;

assess, by the computer based system, benefits of each hardware processing job as compared with the costs of each hardware processing job; and

make, by the computer based system, a value based decision based on the assessment.

6. The computer based system of claim 5 , wherein the business dimension further comprises a business process and an associated business performance metric.

7. The computer based system of claim 6 , wherein the allocating further comprises determining a total cost associated with computer-related hardware processing resources from the provider incurred by each group.

8. The computer based system of claim 7 , wherein the processor, when executing the computer program, is further configured to:

determine an internal structure of the entity, including the plurality of groups within the entity;

determine a billing detail of the plurality of groups within the entity; and

determine an application profile of the entity.

9. The computer based system of claim 8 , wherein the processor, when executing the computer program, is further configured to:

assess a technology operational cost in the groups; and

make a value based decision based on the assessment.

10. A non-transitory, tangible computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a plurality of instructions, when executed by a computer based system for managing asset consumption, perform operations comprising:

receiving, by the computer based system, billing information associated with consumption of computer-related hardware processing resources from a computer-related hardware processing resource provider, wherein the billing information includes a unique hardware processing job identifier which identifies a specific project associated with each hardware processing job executed by the computer-related hardware processing resource provider for an entity;

reading, by the computer based system, a business model file comprising a business dimension within the entity, the business dimension including organizational information including a list of a plurality of groups within the entity;

calculating by the computer based system, a benefit of each hardware processing job;

displaying, by the computer based system, the costs incurred by each group graphically during different time periods; and

assessing, by the computer based system, benefits of each hardware processing job as compared with the costs of each hardware processing job; and

making, by the computer based system, a value based decision based on the assessment.

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the business dimension further comprises a business process and an associated business performance metric.

12. The computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the allocating further comprises determining a total cost associated with computer-related hardware processing resources from the provider incurred by each group.

13. The computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the reading further comprises:

determining an internal structure of the entity, including the plurality of groups within the entity;

determining a billing detail of the plurality of groups within the entity; and

determining an application profile of the entity.

14. The method of claim 4 , further comprising displaying the costs incurred by each group graphically; wherein a comparison of costs for each group is possible.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 16, 2018
From: III HOLDINGS 1, LLC
To: LIBERTY PEAK VENTURES, LLC
Reel/Frame 045611/0193 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2014
From: AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
To: III HOLDINGS 1, LLC
Reel/Frame 032722/0746 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 014346 FRAME 0910. Recorded Jun 21, 2007
From: DELIWALA, MANISH K.; GOULATIA, ASHISH; WILLIAMS, NOREEN
To: AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 019462/0162 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 28, 2003
From: DELIWALA, MANISH K.; GOULATIA, ASHISH; WILLIAMS, NOREEN
To: AMERICAN EXPRESS TRS COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 014346/0910 →