Dynamic cost network routing
View Patent ↗To determine a network route corresponding to user needs, costs are dynamically defined for each link of a network. Specifically, based on link characteristics, routing factors are defined and for each factor, allowable values are defined. When determining a route, one or more routing factors and one or more allowable values for each factor are selected. Based on user prioritization of these factors and prioritization of the allowable values for each factor, weights are assigned to the factors and costs are assigned to the values. Link costs are determined by comparing a given link to each selected factor and determining for each factor which allowable value matches the link's characteristics. The cost of each matching value is then weighted by its corresponding factor. The weighted costs are summed to determine a link cost. The link costs are subsequently used to determine a route through the network.
1. A method for determining a route through a network, the method comprising:
identifying a plurality of routes, wherein each route comprises a plurality of links;
calculating a route cost for each route by summing a link cost calculated for each link of the plurality of links; and
selecting a route based on the calculated route costs; wherein the link cost for each link is calculated by determining a weighting value for a routing factor of a plurality of routing factors;
determining a cost value by matching an allowable value of the routing factor to a characteristic of the link;
determining a weighted cost value by combining the determined weighting value with the determined cost value;
repeating the determining operations for each of the plurality of routing factors; and
summing the determined weighted cost value for each of the plurality of routing factors to determine the link cost;
selecting the plurality of routing factors from a set of routing factors;
for each selected routing factor, selecting one or more allowable values;
assigning a weight to each selected routing factor; and
for each selected routing factor, assigning each selected allowable value a cost.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
prioritizing the plurality of routing factors; and
for each routing factor, prioritizing the allowable values.
3. The method of claim 2 further comprising:
determining a weight for each routing factor automatically based on the prioritization of the routing factor; and
for each routing factor, determining a cost for each of the allowable values automatically based on the prioritization of the values.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining if the routing factor applies to the link and if the routing factor does not apply, assigning a large cost value to the weighting value.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining if an allowable value matches the characteristic of the link; and if no allowable value matches the characteristic of the link, using a large cost value for the cost value.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the weights assigned to the selected routing factors are based on a prioritization of the factors.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the costs assigned to the selected allowable values for each selected routing factor are based on a prioritization of the allowable values.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected one or more allowable values includes a default value, and wherein the default value matches the characteristic of the link if no other allowable value matches the characteristic of the link.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the link costs are calculated before identifying the plurality of routes.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the link costs are calculated as the plurality of routes are identified.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising determining if all of the plurality of routing factors apply to the link; and if not, disregarding the link.
12. The method of claim 10 further comprising determining if the routing factor applies to the link; and if not, disregarding the link.
13. The method of claim 12 further comprising determining if an allowable value for the routing factor matches a characteristic of the link; and if not, disregarding the link.
14. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining if an allowable value for the routing factor matches a characteristic of the link; if not, determining if an allowable value has a default value; and if an allowable value has a default value, determining the cost value based on the default value.
15. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of routes are identified before the link costs are calculated.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein combining the determined weighting value with the determined cost value comprises multiplying the determined weighting value and the determined cost value.