IP Library Granted Patent US 7,184,489
Granted Patent B2
US 7,184,489 · App. 10/693,140 · Granted Feb 27, 2007

Optimization technique for layered modulation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,184,489
App. No.
10/693,140
Granted
Feb 27, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for optimizing a system for transmitting a layered modulated signal is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of defining the system in terms of a set of system parameters, including an optimal power separation S between a power of a first modulation layer and a power of a second modulation layer and a required system carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR S ), determining an optimal power separation S to minimize the error rate of a lower layer modulated signal BER L , and selecting the remaining system parameters in the set of system parameters using the determined optimal power separation S.

Claims (299)

1. A method of optimizing a system for transmitting a layered modulated signal, comprising the steps of:

defining the system in terms of a set of system parameters, including an optimal power separation S between a power of a first modulation layer and a power of a second modulation layer and a required system carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR S );

determining an optimal power separation S to minimize an error rate of a lower layer modulated signal BER L ; and

selecting remaining system parameters in the set of system parameters using the determined optimal power separation S.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the layered modulation signal comprises an upper layer signal and a lower layer signal, and

the step of selecting the remaining system parameters using the determined optimal power separation P x comprises the steps of:

determining a required CNR for the upper layer (CNR U ) and a required CNR for the lower layer (CNR L ) from a relationship between an upper layer coding rate C UL and CNR U , and a lower level coding rate C LL and CNR L ; and

determining a required system CNR (CNR s ) from CNR U , CNR L , and S.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the required CNR s is determined at least in part from the relations:

CNR

U

=

10

log

10

10

(

CNR

S

+

S

)

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

10

CNR

S

10

;

and

CNR

L

=

10

log

10

10

CNR

S

1

+

10

S

10

,

wherein (CNR s ) from CNR U , CNR L , and S are expressed in decibels.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein C UL =C LL .

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein C UL ≠C LL and wherein the step of determining a required system CNR (CNR s ) from CNR U , CNR L , and P x , comprises the steps of:

selecting a value for CNR U and a value for CNR L ; and

determining the required CNR s from a relationship between CNR s and CNR U , CNR L , and S.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the required CNR s is determined at least in part from the relation:

10

log

10

10

(

CNR

S

+

S

)

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

10

CNR

S

10

=

10

log

10

10

CNR

S

10

1

+

10

S

10

.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the error rate of a upper layer modulated signal BER U =γBER L , wherein γ<1, and wherein:

the method further comprises the step of determining an upper layer CNR compensation β required to produce an upper layer modulated signal error rate BER U defined at least in part by the relationship CNR* U =CNR U +β; and

the step of selecting the remaining system parameters using the determined optimal power separation S comprises the steps of:

determining the required system CNR, CNR s , at least in part from the determined optimal power separation, S, and a relation

10

log

10

10

(

CNR

s

+

S

)

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

10

CNR

s

10

=

10

log

10

10

CNR

s

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

β

.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the upper layer CNR compensation β is determined at least in part from a relationship between β and parameters including CNR U and γ.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein β is determined at least in part from a relationship between β and parameters further including C UL .

10. The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein the upper layer CNR compensation β is determined at least in part from a relationship between β and parameters including CNR U and γ.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein β is determined at least in part from a relationship between β and parameters further including C UL .

12. An apparatus for optimizing a system for transmitting a layered modulated signal, comprising:

means for defining the system in terms of system parameters, including an optimal power separation S between a power of a first modulation layer and a power of a second modulation layer and a required system carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR S );

means for determining an optimal power separation S to minimize an error rate of a lower layer modulated signal BER L ; and

means for selecting remaining system parameters using the determined optimal power separation S.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein:

the layered modulation signal comprises an upper layer signal and a lower layer signal, and

the means for selecting the remaining system parameters using the determined optimal power separation P x comprises:

means for determining a required CNR for the upper layer (CNR U ) and a required CNR for the lower layer (CNR L ) from a relationship between an upper layer coding rate C UL and CNR U , and a lower level coding rate C LL and CNR L ; and

means for determining a required system CNR (CNR s ) from CNR U , CNR L , and S.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the required CNR s is determined at least in part from the relations:

CNR

U

=

10

log

10

10

(

CNR

s

+

S

)

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

10

CNR

s

10

;

and

CNR

L

=

10

log

10

10

CNR

s

10

1

+

10

S

10

,

wherein (CNR s ) from CNR U , CNR L , and S are expressed in decibels.

15. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein C UL =C LL .

16. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein C UL ≠C LL and wherein the means for determining a required system CNR (CNR s ) from CNR U , CNR L , and P x , comprises:

means for selecting a value for CNR U and a value for CNR L ; and

means for determining the required CNR s from a relationship between CNR s and CNR U , CNR L , and S.

17. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the required CNR s is determined at least in part from the relation:

10

log

10

10

(

CNR

s

+

S

)

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

10

CNR

s

10

=

10

log

10

10

CNR

s

10

1

+

10

S

10

.

18. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the error rate of a upper layer modulated signal BER U =γBER L , wherein γ<1, and wherein:

the apparatus further comprises means for determining an upper layer CNR compensation β required to produce an upper layer modulated signal error rate BER U defined at least in part by the relationship CNR* U =CNR U +β; and

the means for selecting the remaining system parameters using the determined optimal power separation S comprises:

means for determining the required system CNR, CNR s , at least in part from the determined optimal power separation, S, and a relation

10

log

10

10

(

CNR

s

+

S

)

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

10

CNR

s

10

=

10

log

10

10

CNR

s

10

1

+

10

S

10

+

β

.

19. An system for transmitting a layered modulation signal characterized by a CNR of CNR s having an upper layer signal characterized and a lower layer signal, wherein a power of the upper layer signal is separated by a power of the lower layer signal by a power separation S, the apparatus defined by performing the steps of:

defining the system in terms of a set of system parameters, including an optimal power separation S between a power of a first modulation layer and a power of a second modulation layer and a required system carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR S );

determining an optimal power separation S to minimize an error rate of a lower layer modulated signal BER L ; and

selecting remaining system parameters in the set of system parameters using the determined optimal power separation S.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2021
From: THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.
To: DIRECTV, LLC
Reel/Frame 057033/0451 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 27, 2021
From: HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.
To: THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 056994/0476 →