IP Library Granted Patent US 8,544,005
Granted Patent B2
US 8,544,005 · App. 10/695,056 · Granted Sep 24, 2013

Autonomic method, system and program product for managing processes

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,544,005
App. No.
10/695,056
Granted
Sep 24, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

An improved solution for managing processes. In particular, resources are allocated to processes based on a determination of the available resources and an anticipated benefit for each process. The anticipated benefit can be derived from a current status of the process (e.g., lagging or accelerated) and/or benefit knowledge learned from past executions of the process using diverse resource sets. One or more additional attributes, such as resource dependency between processes, can also be considered before allocating resources.

Claims (59)

1. A method, performed by a computer hardware system, of managing a set of processes and a set of resources within the computer hardware system, comprising:

identifying, from the set of processes within the computer hardware system, a plurality of lagging processes;

identifying, from the set of resources within the computer hardware system, a plurality of available resources that are available for use by the plurality of lagging processes;

calculating, for a particular one of the plurality of lagging processes, a calculated benefit to be realized upon a particular one of the plurality of available resources being assigned to the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes, the benefit being calculated based on actual performance improvements that were obtained from one or more previous allocations of the same or similar set of available resources to the particular process;

comparing the calculated benefit for the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes with other calculated benefits for others of the plurality of lagging processes being assigned the particular one of the plurality of available resources; and

assigning, within the computer hardware system and based upon the comparing, the particular one of the plurality of available resources to a selected one of the lagging processes.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein

the selected one of the lagging processes is a most responsive process to the particular one of the plurality of available resources.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

executing the selected one of the lagging processes using the particular one of the plurality of available resources.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

identifying, from the set of processes within the computer hardware system, an accelerated process; and

reassigning a resource, from the accelerated process, to the selected one of the lagging processes.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein

the calculating is based upon a benefit knowledge database.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein

the calculated benefit for the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes includes a calculated saved time between

(i) the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes being assigned the particular one of the available resources, and

(ii) the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes not being assigned the particular one of the available resources.

7. A computer hardware system for managing a set of processes and a set of resources within the computer hardware system, comprising:

at least one processor, the at least one processor including

a process module configured to identify, from the set of processes within the computer hardware system, a plurality of lagging processes;

a resource module configured to identify, from the set of resources within the computer hardware system, a plurality of available resources that are available for use by the plurality of lagging processes;

a benefit module configured to calculate, for a particular one of the plurality of lagging processes, a calculated benefit to be realized upon a particular one of the plurality of available resources being assigned to the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes, the benefit being calculated based on actual performance improvements that were obtained from one or more previous allocations of the same or similar set of available resources to the particular process;

an allocation module configured to

perform a comparison between the calculated benefit for the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes and other calculated benefits for others of the plurality of lagging processes being assigned the particular one of the plurality of available resources; and

assign, within the computer hardware system and based upon the comparison, the particular one of the plurality of available resources to a selected one of the lagging processes.

8. The computer hardware system of claim 7 , wherein

the selected one of the lagging processes is a most responsive process to the particular one of the plurality of available resources.

9. The computer hardware system of claim 7 , wherein

the at least one processor includes an execution module configured to execute the selected one of the lagging processes using the particular one of the plurality of available resources.

10. The computer hardware system of claim 7 , wherein

the process module is configured to identify, from the set of processes within the computer hardware system, an accelerated process; and

the allocation module is configured to reassign a resource, from the accelerated process, to the selected one of the lagging processes.

11. The computer hardware system of claim 7 , further comprising a benefit knowledge database, wherein

the benefit module is coupled to the benefit knowledge database and calculates the calculated benefit utilizing the benefit knowledge database.

12. The computer hardware system of claim 7 , wherein

the calculated benefit for the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes includes a calculated saved time between

(i) the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes being assigned the particular one of the available resources, and

(ii) the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes not being assigned the particular one of the available resources.

13. A computer-readable storage device having stored therein computer usable program code for managing a set of processes and a set of resources within a computer hardware system, the computer usable program code, when executed by the computer hardware system, causing the computer hardware system to perform:

identifying, from the set of processes within the computer hardware system, a plurality of lagging processes;

identifying, from the set of resources within the computer hardware system, a plurality of available resources that are available for use by the plurality of lagging processes;

calculating, for a particular one of the plurality of lagging processes, a calculated benefit to be realized upon a particular one of the plurality of available resources being assigned to the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes, the benefit being calculated based on actual performance improvements that were obtained from one or more previous allocations of the same or similar set of available resources to the particular process;

comparing the calculated benefit for the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes with other calculated benefits for others of the plurality of lagging processes being assigned the particular one of the plurality of available resources; and

assigning, within the computer hardware system and based upon the comparing, the particular one of the plurality of available resources to a selected one of the lagging processes.

14. The computer-readable storage device of claim 13 , wherein

the selected one of the lagging processes is a most responsive process to the particular one of the plurality of available resources.

15. The computer-readable storage device of claim 13 , further comprising

executing the selected one of the lagging processes using the particular one of the plurality of available resources.

16. The computer-readable storage device of claim 13 , further comprising

identifying, from the set of processes within the computer hardware system, an accelerated process; and

reassigning a resource, from the accelerated process, to the selected one of the lagging processes.

17. The computer-readable storage device of claim 13 , wherein

the calculating is based upon a benefit knowledge database.

18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 13 , wherein

the calculated benefit for the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes includes a calculated saved time between

(i) the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes being assigned the particular one of the available resources, and

(ii) the particular one of the plurality of lagging processes not being assigned the particular one of the available resources.

Assignments (2)
CONVEYOR IS ASSIGNING ALL INTEREST Recorded Jan 10, 2018
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: SERVICENOW, INC.
Reel/Frame 045040/0710 →
CONVEYOR IS ASSIGNING UNDIVIDED 50% INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2017
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: SERVICENOW, INC.; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 044413/0158 →