IP Library Granted Patent US 7,194,488
Granted Patent B2
US 7,194,488 · App. 10/700,410 · Granted Mar 20, 2007

Split processing system for providing increased system availability

Assignee: Gravic, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,194,488
App. No.
10/700,410
Granted
Mar 20, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A split processing system is provided that has a plurality of nodes and a communication network. Each node includes one or more processors, or a processor subsystem including at least one processor and an operating system. Each node has a specific number of failure modes which is less than the number of failure modes in an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node. The communication network allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to interoperate with each other.

Claims (75)

1. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including one or more processors;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein at least some of the nodes are database processing nodes which include an instance of a portion of a database or an instance of all of a database.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein at least some of the nodes are processing nodes which do not contain a database.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein at least some of the nodes that do not contain a database are provided access to contents of databases in other nodes via the communication network.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein each of the database processing nodes further comprise an operating system and one or more applications.

5. The system of claim 1 wherein at least some of the database processing nodes include disk systems having one or more disk drives for accessing the respective databases.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein at least some of the database processing nodes include memory-resident systems having one or more memory-resident storage devices.

7. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including one or more processors;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein at least some of the nodes include an instance of a portion of a database or an instance of all of a database.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein at least some of the nodes have the same portion of the database as each other, the nodes that have the same portion of the database as each other further comprise database replication software which allows the same portions of the database to remain synchronized whenever the contents of the database at one of the nodes is changed.

9. The system of claim 8 wherein database replication software performs the synchronization using synchronous replication.

10. The system of claim 8 wherein database replication software performs the synchronization using asynchronous replication.

11. The system of claim 8 wherein database replication software performs the synchronization using dual write synchronization.

12. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including:

(i) a processor subsystem including at least one processor, and

(ii) an operating system;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein at least some of the nodes include an instance of a portion of a database or an instance of all of a database.

13. The system of claim 12 wherein at least some of the nodes have the same portion of the database as each other, the nodes that have the same portion of the database as each other further comprise database replication software which allows the same portions of the database to remain synchronized whenever the contents of the database at one of the nodes is changed.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein database replication software performs the synchronization using synchronous replication.

15. The system of claim 13 wherein database replication software performs the synchronization using asynchronous replication.

16. The system of claim 13 wherein database replication software performs the synchronization using dual write synchronization.

17. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including one or more processors;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein each node operates independently of each other.

18. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including:

(i) a processor subsystem including at least one processor, and

(ii) an operating system;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein each node operates independently of each other.

19. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including one or more processors;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein each node has less processors than the number of processors in an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node.

20. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including:

(i) a processor subsystem including at least one processor, and

(ii) an operating system;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein each node has less processors than the number of processors in an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node.

21. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including one or more processors;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein the split system has a specific number of failure modes which is less than the number of failure modes in an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node.

22. The system of claim 21 wherein the number of failure modes is calculated from the number of nodes and spares of critical components.

23. A split processing system comprising:

(a) a plurality of nodes, each node including one or more processors;

(b) a communication network that allows the one or more processors at each of the nodes to cooperate with each other; and

(c) means to allow one or more of the nodes to take over processing capacity of a node that becomes lost,

the availability of the split processing system being greater than the availability of an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node,

wherein the split system has a specific number of failure modes which is less than the number of failure modes in an unsplit system wherein all of the processors are located at a single node.

24. The system of claim 23 wherein the number of failure modes is calculated from the number of nodes and spares of critical components.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 3, 2015
From: GRAVIC, INC.
To: INTEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 036487/0205 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 1036831500 · Feb 13, 2003
Provisional Application 6041172000 · Sep 17, 2002
Provisional Application 6035703400 · Feb 14, 2002
Related Publication 20040098411A1 · May 20, 2004