IP Library Granted Patent US 7,034,547
Granted Patent B2
US 7,034,547 · App. 10/722,527 · Granted Apr 25, 2006

Method of diagnosing a fault on a transformer winding

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,034,547
App. No.
10/722,527
Granted
Apr 25, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a method of diagnosing a fault on a transformer winding by using frequency response analysis. The method comprises the steps of: measuring the impedance on said winding as a function of frequency, said measurement being represented in the form of a first voltage gain; comparing said impedance measurement with a reference measurement represented in the form of a second voltage gain, said comparison including a step of calculating three first parameters, each of said three first parameters being a correlation coefficient, between said first and second gains over three different frequency ranges. The method further comprises a step of determining the relative variation of at least a fourth parameter, said fourth parameter being a physical magnitude characteristic of said transformer, said relative variation being obtained by comparing said first and second gains.

Claims (19)

1. A method of diagnosing a fault on a transformer winding, the method comprising the steps of:

measuring the impedance on said winding as a function of frequency, said measurement being represented in the form of a first voltage gain;

comparing said impedance measurement with a reference measurement represented in the form of a second voltage gain, said comparing includes calculating three first parameters, each of said three first parameters being a correlation coefficient, between said first and second gains over three different frequency ranges;

determining the relative variation of at least a fourth parameter, said fourth parameter being a physical magnitude characteristic of said transformer, said relative variation being obtained by comparing said first and second gains;

associating at least one diagnosis code with each of said three first parameters and said relative variation of said fourth parameter; and

determining the presence of the fault and identifying said fault by comparing each diagnosis code with a reference code.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said fourth parameter is selected from minimum gain, fundamental resonant frequency, and number of resonant frequencies present above a predetermined frequency.

3. A method according to claim 2 , wherein said minimum gain is determined for a frequency below 10 kHz.

4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said three different frequency ranges are respectively: [1 kHz to 10 kHz], [10 kHz to 100 kHz], and [100 kHz to 1 MHz].

5. A method according to claim 1 , including a step of determining the relative variation of at least a fifth parameter and a sixth parameter, said fifth and sixth parameters being characteristics of said transformer, said relative variation being obtained by comparing said first and second gains.

6. A method according to claim 5 , wherein said fourth parameter is a minimum gain, said fifth parameter is a fundamental resonant frequency, and said sixth parameter is a number of resonant frequencies present above a predetermined frequency.

7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein each of said diagnosis codes indicates whether a respective one of said parameters belongs to a predetermined range of values.

8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the reference codes are stored in a search table.

9. A method according to claim 1 , wherein one of said three different frequency ranges covers the range from 1 kHz to 10 kHz.

10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein one of said three different frequency ranges covers the range from 10 kHz to 100 kHz.

11. A method according to claim 1 , wherein one of said three different frequency ranges covers the range from 100 kHz to 1 MHz.

12. A method according to claim 5 , wherein said fourth parameter is a minimum gain.

13. A method according to claim 5 , wherein said fifth parameter is a fundamental resonant frequency.

14. A method according to claim 5 , wherein said sixth parameter is a number of resonant frequencies present above a predetermined frequency.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2013
From: ALSTOM GRID SAS
To: ALSTOM TECHNOLOGY LTD
Reel/Frame 031029/0933 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 27, 2012
From: AREVA T&D SAS
To: ALSTOM GRID SAS
Reel/Frame 029355/0641 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 23, 2012
From: AREVA T&D SA
To: AREVA T&D SAS
Reel/Frame 029343/0282 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 31, 2006
From: ALSTOM T&D SA
To: AREVA T&D SA
Reel/Frame 017411/0591 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2004
From: RYDER, SIMON
To: ALSTOM T&D SA
Reel/Frame 015288/0736 →