IP Library Granted Patent US 7,082,939
Granted Patent B2
US 7,082,939 · App. 10/731,066 · Granted Aug 1, 2006

Frame saw for cutting granite and method to improve performance of frame saw for cutting granite

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,082,939
App. No.
10/731,066
Granted
Aug 1, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A horizontal frame saw is equipped with a plurality of generally parallel, spaced-apart blades for cutting granite. Each of the blades has a cutting edge with diamond cutting segments mounted thereon for engaging the granite with a swinging motion for cutting of the granite, wherein the segments have optimized/controlled segment variables for uniform wearing of the segments along each blade during cutting of granite. Segment variables include one or more of: spacing of segments along the length of the blade; diamond concentration in each segment; diamond grade (as measured by compressive fracture strength) in each segment; segment composition (bond, secondary abrasives); or segment dimensions.

Claims (49)

1. A device for cutting a block into slabs, said device comprising:

a plurality of generally parallel, spaced-apart blades,

each of the blades having a blade length with two ends and a center,

each of the blades having a plurality of cutting segments mounted thereon, the cutting segments being spaced apart from one another by a center-to-center distance,

each of the cutting segments comprising a continuous phase impregnated with a superabrasive material selected from one of natural diamond, synthetic diamond, cubic boron nitride, and combinations thereof; and

wherein there is a spacing variation of at least 1 mm between a maximum center-to-center distance and a minimum center-to-center distance of the cutting segments.

2. The device of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 10% of blade length from each end of the blades have a center-to-center spacing that differs by at least 1 mm from the center-to-center spacing of at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 10% of blade length from the center of the blades.

3. The device of claim 2 , wherein at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 25% of blade length from each end of the blades have a center-to-center spacing that differs by at least 2 mm from the center-to-center spacing of at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 25% of blade length from the center of the blades.

4. The device of claim 2 , wherein at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 25% of blade length from each end of the blades have a center-to-center spacing that differs by at least 5 mm from the center-to-center spacing of at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 25% of blade length from the center of the blades.

5. The device of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the cutting segments has a wear resistance property that differs by at least 10% from the wear resistance property of at least one of the other cutting segments mounted on the same blade.

6. The device of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the cutting segments has at least one wear resistance variable that is different from at least one of the other cutting segments mounted on the same blade, wherein the at least one wear resistance variable is selected from the group of:

concentration of the superabrasive materials;

grade of the superabrasive materials as measured by compressive fracture strength (CFS) property;

at least one dimension of said segment;

amount of secondary abrasives in said segment;

concentration of secondary abrasives in said segment; and

grain size of said superabrasive materials.

7. A device for cutting a block into slabs, said device comprising:

a plurality of generally parallel, spaced-apart blades,

each of the blades having a plurality of cutting segments mounted thereon, the cutting segments being spaced apart from one another by a center-to-center distance,

each of the cutting segments comprising a continuous phase impregnated with a superabrasive material selected from one of natural diamond, synthetic diamond, cubic boron nitride, and combinations thereof,

wherein at least one of the cutting segments has a wear resistance property that differs by at least 10% from the wear resistance property of at least one of the other cutting segments mounted on the same blade.

8. The device of claim 7 , wherein at least one cutting segment has at least one wear resistance property variable that is different from at least one of the other cutting segments, said at least one wear resistance variable is selected from the group of:

concentration of the superabrasive materials,

grade of the superabrasive materials as measured by compressive fracture strength (CFS) property;

at least one dimension of said segment;

amount of secondary abrasives in said segment;

concentration of secondary abrasives in said segment; and

grain size of said superabrasive materials.

9. The device of claim 7 , wherein at least two of the cutting segments comprise superabrasive materials with different sizes and grades.

10. The device of claim 7 , wherein the cutting segments contain blends of at least two components: coarse diamond crystals and fine diamond crystals having different compressive fracture strength (CFS) properties, and where the coarse diamond crystals have a CFS of at least about 70 N greater than the fine diamond crystals.

11. The device of claim 10 , wherein the CFS property difference between the coarse diamond crystals and the fine diamond crystals is between about 70 N and 100 N.

12. The device of claim 10 , wherein the coarse diamond crystals are at least about 300 μm larger than the fine diamond crystals.

13. The device of claim 10 , wherein the size difference between the coarse diamond crystals and the fine diamond crystals is between about 300 and 400 μm.

14. A method for cutting a block, the method comprising:

providing a cutting device comprising a plurality of generally parallel, spaced-apart blades, each of the blades having a plurality of cutting segments mounted thereon, the cutting segments being spaced apart from one another by a center-to-center distance, each of the cutting segments comprising a continuous phase impregnated with a superabrasive material selected from one of natural diamond, synthetic diamond, cubic boron nitride, and combinations thereof, wherein at least one of the cutting segments has a higher wear resistance property than at least one of the other cutting segments mounted on the same blade; and

cutting a block using the cutting device.

15. A method for cutting a block comprising:

providing a cutting device comprising a plurality of generally parallel, spaced-apart blades, each of the blades having a blade length with two ends, a center, and a plurality of cutting segments mounted thereon, the cutting segments being spaced-apart from one another by a center-to-center distance, each of the cutting segments comprising a continuous phase impregnated with a superabrasive material selected from one of natural diamond, synthetic diamond, cubic boron nitride, and combinations thereof, wherein there is a spacing variation of at least 1 mm between maximum center-to-center distance of the cutting segments; and

cutting a block using the cutting device.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 10% of blade length from each end of the blades have a center-to-center spacing that differs by at least 2 mm from the center-to-center spacing of at least one of the cutting segments located at or within 10% of blade length from the center of the blades.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein at least one of the cutting segments has at least one wear resistance property variable that is different from said at least one of the other cutting segments,

said at least one wear resistance variable is selected from the group of:

concentration of the superabrasive materials, grade of the superabrasive materials as measured by compressive fracture strength (CFS) property, dimensions of said segment, amount of secondary abrasives in said segment, concentration of secondary abrasives in said segment, and grain size of said superabrasive materials.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the cutting segments contain blends of at least two components: coarse diamond crystals and fine diamond crystals having different compressive fracture strength (CFS) properties, and wherein the coarse diamond crystals have a CFS of at least about 70 N greater than the fine diamond crystals.

19. A device for cutting a block into slabs, comprising:

a plurality of generally parallel, spaced-apart blades, each of the blades having a plurality of cutting segments mounted thereon, each of the cutting segments comprising a continuous phase impregnated with a superabrasive material selected from one of natural diamond, synthetic diamond, cubic boron nitride, and combinations thereof;

wherein segments located within zones that experience high relative wear rates contain superabrasive material having a higher average CFS than segments located within zones that experience lower relative wear rates.

20. The device of claim 19 wherein the higher average CFS is at least 10%.

Assignments (10)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026272 FRAME 0836. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS' INTEREST. Recorded Jul 18, 2011
From: DIAMOND INNOVATIONS INC.
To: EHWA DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 026605/0490 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE COVER SHEET DATA - ASSIGNEE AND CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026067 FRAME 0020. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF THE ASSIGNEE FROM EHWA DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD, TO EHWA DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD. Recorded May 4, 2011
From: DIAMOND INNOVATIONS, INC.
To: EHWA DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD.
Reel/Frame 026272/0836 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 4, 2011
From: DIAMOND INNOVATIONS, INC.
To: EHWA DIAMOND INDUSTIRAL COMPANY, LTD.
Reel/Frame 026067/0020 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2004
From: PROSKE, KURT
To: DIAMOND INNOVATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 015413/0411 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2004
From: KUEHN, ANDRE
To: DIAMOND INNOVATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 015413/0356 →
CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT - REEL 015190, FRAME 0560 Recorded Oct 25, 2004
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: GE SUPERABRASIVES, INC.
Reel/Frame 015913/0763 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2004
From: GE SUPERABRASIVES, INC.
To: DIAMOND INNOVATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 015147/0674 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2004
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: GE SUPERABRASIVES, INC.
Reel/Frame 015190/0560 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2003
From: DOSSENA, ERNESTO; JAKOBUSS, MARKUS; KUEHN, ANDRE; PROSKE, KURT; TURNER, DENNIS; ZIMMERMAN, MICHAEL H.
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 014217/0049 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2003
From: DOSSENA, ERNESTO; JAKOBUSS, MARKUS; TURNER, DENNIS; ZIMMERMAN, MICHAEL H.
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 014784/0691 →