IP Library Granted Patent US 7,171,261
Granted Patent B1
US 7,171,261 · App. 10/741,410 · Granted Jan 30, 2007

Forward masking method for estimating neural response

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,171,261
App. No.
10/741,410
Granted
Jan 30, 2007
Kind
B1
Abstract

An improved forward-masking method of recording and processing neural responses (“NR”) is provided, wherein the method does not assume a linear system response and does not assume a linear response at the interface between electrodes and tissue. The method of the present invention cancels out non-linearities and/or system hysteresis. Other artifacts such as system cross-talk between stimulation and recording circuits are also canceled out.

Claims (25)

1. A method of recording and processing neural response (NR) using a stimulating electrode and a recording electrode, the method comprising:

(a) recording a response in which the first stimulus and the second stimulus are separated by a time gap greater than the relative refractory period (Rmp_distant), while a first supra-threshold stimulus pulse, S 1 , is delivered to a target nerve and, thereafter, a second stimulus pulse, S 2 is delivered to the target nerve, wherein S 2 is initiated outside of the relative refractory period of the action potential elicited by delivery of S 1 ;

(b) recording a response in which a first stimulus and a second stimulus are separated by a time gap of less than the relative refractory period (Rmp), while a supra-threshold stimulus pulse, S 3 , which is essentially identical to S 1 , is delivered to the target nerve, and a second stimulus pulse, S 4 , essentially identical to S 2 is delivered to the target nerve, wherein S 4 is initiated within the relative refractory period of the action potential of the target nerve elicited by delivery of S 3 ;

(c) recording a stimulus pulse (Rm), while a supra-threshold stimulus pulse, S 5 , essentially identical to S 1 , is delivered to the target nerve; and

(d) processing the recordings to yield an estimate NR in accordance with the relation: estimated NR=(Rmp_distant−Rm)−Time Shift(Rmp−Rm).

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the recordings is the same duration.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein S 1 and S 2 are essentially identical.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target nerve is a cochlear nerve.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the stimulating electrode and recording electrode are part of an electrode array.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the stimuli S 1 , S 2 , S 3 and S 4 are delivered in a monopolar mode.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target nerve is a spinal cord nerve.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein S 1 , S 2 , S 3 , S 4 , and S 5 are all charged-balance, biphasic stimuli, the first phase of each stimuli having a negative polarity.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein S 1 , S 2 , S 3 , S 4 , and S 5 are all current-controlled, constant-current stimuli.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the steps (a), (b) or (c) is repeated in order to provide an averaged value of at least one of Rmp_distant, Rmp, or Rm, which averaged value is used in step (d).

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

(e) repeating all of the steps (a), (b), (c) and (d) at least once and averaging the obtained value of all estimated NRs to obtained an averaged estimated NR.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step (d) processing the recording is accomplished by uploading Rmp_distant, Rmp and Rm from the implanted device to a microprocessor located in an implanted device, so that all processing is accomplished inside the implanted device.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the implanted device is a spinal cord stimulator.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the implanted device is an implanted cochlear stimulator.

15. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the step (d) processing the recording is accomplished by uploading the Rmp_distant; the Rmp and Rm from the implanted device and processing the recordings with a microprocessor that is located in an external device; and

wherein the external device has a communications link with the implanted device.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the external device is a behind-the-ear (BTE) device of a cochlear stimulator.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the steps (a), (b) and (c) are accomplished by sampling and recording Rmp_distant, Rmp and Rm in digital form and storing them in a memory.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the step (d) is performed by retrieving the digital recordings of Rmp_distant, Rmp and Rm from memory, and using a microprocessor capable of numerical functions such as adding and subtracting data points in data arrays, which functions may be used to calculate estimated NR.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 29, 2019
From: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
To: ADVANCED BIONICS AG
Reel/Frame 050855/0961 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 7, 2008
From: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION
To: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
Reel/Frame 020340/0713 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 28, 2007
From: ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION
To: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 020309/0361 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 21, 2007
From: ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION
To: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 020299/0200 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 8, 2004
From: OVERSTREET, EDWARD H.; LITVAK, LEONID M.
To: ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 014831/0653 →