IP Library Granted Patent US 7,272,516
Granted Patent B2
US 7,272,516 · App. 10/745,122 · Granted Sep 18, 2007

Failure rate adjustment for electric power network reliability analysis

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,272,516
App. No.
10/745,122
Granted
Sep 18, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methodologies adjust a component failure rate for electric power network reliability analysis. A component may include subcomponents and the failure of each subcomponent may be feature dependent. Features are measurable or observable inputs, which can affect the life of one or more subcomponents. The failure rate of a particular component may be obtained according to its real conditions. The methodologies can be used to do condition-based reliability analysis for electric power networks, in order to obtain a maintenance/replacement/operation strategy.

Claims (52)

1. A method for providing a reliability assessment of a power network, the method comprising:

providing a display device;

determining information representative of a failure rate of a power network component based on a population of power network components of the same type as the power network component;

receiving information representative of the condition of the power network component; and

determining an adjusted failure rate for the power network component based on the information representative of the failure rate of the power network component and the information representative of the condition of the power network component, wherein determining the adjusted failure rate for the power network component comprises:

converting the information representative of the condition of the power network component into an adjustment index; and

converting the adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate using the information representative of the failure rate of the power network component; and

displaying adjusted failure rate on the display device.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the information representative of a failure rate of a power network component comprises receiving a failure rate from a data store containing failure rates of a plurality of power network components, wherein the failure rate for each power network component is based on a population of power network components of the same type as the power network component.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the information representative of a failure rate of a power network component comprises determining a failure rate by processing historical power network component failure data for a plurality of power network components of the same type as the power network component.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein receiving the information representative of the condition of the power network component comprises receiving one of the age of the power network component, information representative of maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of preventative maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of the environment of the power network component, information representative of the operating conditions of the power network component.

5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein converting the information representative of the condition of the power network component into an adjustment index comprises transforming a condition feature (x) of the power network component using a single-input, single-output (SISO) function, wherein the SISO function is selected from the group consisting of a linear function having the form f(x)=Ax+B, a power function having the form f(x)=A(x^B), a first exponential function having the form f(x)=A[exp(−Bx)], a second exponential function having the form f(x)=A[1−exp(−Bx)] and a logistic function having the form f(x)=A/[1+exp(−Bx)].

6. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the step of determining information representative of the failure rate of the power network component comprises determining a cumulative distribution function (CDF) from historical power network component failure data for a plurality of power network components of the same type as the power network component, and wherein the step of converting the adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate comprises mapping the adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate using the CDF.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the adjusted failure rate for the power network component comprises:

determining a plurality of subcomponents contributing to the failure rate of the power network component;

for each subcomponent, determining information representative of a failure rate of the subcomponent based on a population of subcomponents of the same type as the subcomponent;

determining information representative of the condition of each subcomponent;

for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding information representative of the condition of the subcomponent into an adjustment index;

for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding adjustment index into an adjusted failure rate for the subcomponent using the information representative of the failure rate of the subcomponent; and

combining the adjusted failure rates for the subcomponents to produce the adjusted failure rate for the power network component.

8. The method as recited in claim 7 , wherein for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding information representative of the condition of the subcomponent into an adjustment index comprises transforming a condition feature (x) of the subcomponent using a single-input, single-output (SISO) function, wherein the SISO function is selected from the group consisting of a linear function having the form f(x)=Ax+B, a power function having the form f(x)=A(x^B), a first exponential function having the form f(x)=A[exp(−Bx)], a second exponential function having the form f(x)=A[1−exp(−Bx)] and a logistic function having the form f(x)=A/[1+exp(−Bx)].

9. The method as recited in claim 7 , wherein for each subcomponent, the step of determining information representative of a failure rate of the subcomponent comprises determining a cumulative distribution function (CDF) from historical subcomponent failure data for a plurality of suboomponents of the same type as the subcomponent, and wherein for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate comprises mapping the corresponding adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate using the CDF for the subcomponent.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjustment index is a combined adjustment index, and the information representative of the condition of the power network component comprises a plurality of condition features, and wherein the step of converting the information representative of the condition of the power network component comprises:

converting each condition feature into a condition feature adjustment index; and

combining the condition feature adjustment indices so as to form the combined adjustment index.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein each condition feature is selected from the group consisting of the age of the power network component, information representative of maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of preventative maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of the environment of the power network component, and information representative of the operating conditions of the power network component.

12. A reliability assessment system for a power network, the reliability assessment system comprising:

a first data store comprising:

information representative of a failure rate of a power network component based on a population of power network components of the same type as the power network component; and

information representative of the condition of the power network component; and

a computing application cooperating with the first data store and performing:

receiving the information representative of a failure rate of a power network component based on a population of power network components of the same type as the power network component from the first data store;

receiving the information representative of the condition of the power network component from the first data store; and

determining an adjusted failure rate for the power network component based on the information representative of the failure rate of the power network component and the information representative of the condition of the power network component, wherein determining the adjusted failure rate for the power network component comprises:

converting the information representative of the condition of the power network component into an adjustment index; and

converting the adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate using the information representative of the failure rate of the power network component.

13. The system as recited in claim 12 , wherein receiving the information representative of the condition of the power network component comprises receiving one of the age of the power network component, information representative of maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of preventative maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of the environment of the power network component, information representative of the operating conditions of the power network component.

14. The system as recited in claim 12 , wherein converting the information representative of the condition of the power network component into an adjustment index comprises transforming a condition feature (x) of the power network component using a single-input, single-output (SISO) function, wherein the SISO function is selected from the group consisting of a linear function having the form f(x)=Ax+B, a power function having the form f(x)=A(x^B), a first exponential function having the form f(x)=A[exp(−Bx)], a second exponential function having the form f(x)=A[1−exp(−Bx)] and a logistic function having the form f(x)=A/[1+exp(−Bx)].

15. The system as recited in claim 12 , wherein the step of determining information representative of the failure rate of the power network component comprises determining a cumulative distribution function (CDF) from historical power network component failure data for a plurality of power network components of the same type as the power network component, and wherein the step of converting the adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate comprises mapping the adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate using the CDF.

16. The system as recited in claim 12 , wherein determining the adjusted failure rate for the power network component comprises:

determining a plurality of subcomponents contributing to the failure rate of the power network component;

for each subcomponent, determining information representative of a failure rate of the subcomponent based on a population of subcomponents of the same type as the subcomponent;

determining information representative of the condition of each subcomponent;

for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding information representative of the condition of the subcomponent into an adjustment index;

for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding adjustment index into an adjusted failure rate for the subcomponent using the information representative of the failure rate of the subcomponent; and

combining the adjusted failure rates for the subcomponents to produce the adjusted failure rate for the power network component.

17. The system as recited in claim 16 , wherein for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding information representative of the condition of the subcomponent into an adjustment index comprises transforming a condition feature (x) of the subcomponent using a single-input, single-output (SISO) function, wherein the SISO function is selected from the group consisting of a linear function having the form f(x)=Ax+B, a power function having the form f(x)=A(x^B), a first exponential function having the form f(x)=A[exp(−Bx)], a second exponential function having the form f(x)=A[1−exp(−Bx)] and a logistic function having the form f(x)=A/[1+exp(−Bx)].

18. The system as recited in claim 16 , wherein for each subcomponent, the step of determining information representative of a failure rate of the subcomponent comprises determining a cumulative distribution function (CDF) from historical subcomponent failure data for a plurality of subcomponents of the same type as the subcomponent, and wherein for each subcomponent, converting the corresponding adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate comprises mapping the corresponding adjustment index into the adjusted failure rate using the CDF for the subcomponent.

19. The reliability assessment system of claim 12 , wherein the adjustment index is a combined adjustment index, and the Information representative of the condition of the power network component comprises a plurality of condition features, and wherein converting the information representative of the condition of the power network component comprises:

converting each condition feature into a condition feature adjustment index; and

combining the condition feature adjustment indices so as to form the combined adjustment index.

20. The reliability assessment system of claim 19 , wherein each condition feature is selected from the group consisting of the age of the power network component, information representative of maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of preventative maintenance performed on the power network component, information representative of the environment of the power network component, and information representative of the operating conditions of the power network component.

Assignments (6)
MERGER Recorded Nov 13, 2023
From: HITACHI ENERGY SWITZERLAND AG
To: HITACHI ENERGY LTD
Reel/Frame 065549/0576 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 31, 2021
From: ABB POWER GRIDS SWITZERLAND AG
To: HITACHI ENERGY SWITZERLAND AG
Reel/Frame 058666/0540 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 6, 2020
From: ABB SCHWEIZ AG
To: ABB POWER GRIDS SWITZERLAND AG
Reel/Frame 052916/0001 →
MERGER Recorded Dec 26, 2019
From: ABB RESEARCH LTD.
To: ABB SCHWEIZ AG
Reel/Frame 051419/0309 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2004
From: ABB INC.
To: ABB RESEARCH LTD.
Reel/Frame 014290/0719 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 23, 2003
From: WANG, ZHENYUAN; PAN, JIUPING; LUBKEMAN, DAVID; BROWN, RICHARD E.
To: ABB INC.
Reel/Frame 014856/0140 →